Every year millions of people fill out brackets, trying to accurately predict the outcome of the NCAA Men’s Basketball March Madness tournament. This study examines how collective swarm intelligence might impact these choices in small groups. Rather than working by themselves, groups of people came together to combine their knowledge and opinions and pick brackets collectively. It is generally agreed that collective intelligence is effective in decision-making. However, how and why collective intelligence augments performance has not been totally agreed upon, and the theoretical explanations have been elusive. This study examines groups that are either highly dedicated or high in expertise to see whether they perform differently based on these dimensions.
BarnettR. (1994). The limits of competence: Knowledge, higher education and society. Bristol, PA: Open University Press.
2.
BonabeauE. (2009). Decisions 2.0: The power of collective intelligence. MIT Sloan Management Review. Retrieved from http://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/decisions-20-the-power-of-collective-intelligence/
3.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
4.
DeciE. L., & RyanR. M. (2011). Self-determination theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 1, 416–433.
5.
EberhartR., PalmerD., & KirschenbaumM. (2015). Beyond computational intelligence: Blended intelligence. Paper presented at Swarm/Human Blended Intelligence Workshop, Cleveland, OH.
6.
GobetF. (2015). Understanding expertise: A multi-disciplinary approach. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
HutaV., & RyanR. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(6), 735–762.
8.
JenkinsH. (2002). Interactive audiences? In HarriesD. (Ed.), The new media book (pp. 157–170). London, UK: British Film Institute.
9.
LévyP. (1997). Collective intelligence: Mankind’s emerging world in cyberspace. New York, NY: Plenum Trade.
10.
MaloneT. W., LaubacherR., & DellarocasC. (2009). Harnessing crowds: Mapping the genome of collective intelligence (MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 4732-09). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1381502
11.
MaslachC., & LeiterM. P. (2008). Early predictors of job burnout and engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 498.
12.
MataricM. J. (1992). Designing emergent behaviors: From local interactions to collective intelligence. In MeyerJ. A., RoitblatH. L. & WilsonS. W. (Eds.), From Animals to Animats 2, 2nd International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (SAB-92) (pp. 432–441). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
McClellandD. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for ‘intelligence’. American Psychologist, 28(1), 1.
14.
OhanianR. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52.
15.
OliverM., BowmanN., WoolleyJ., RogersR., SherrickB., & ChungM.Y. (2016). Video games as meaningful entertainment experiences. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(4), 390.
16.
RogersR., StrudlerK., DeckerA., & GrazulisA. (2017). Can augmented reality technology “augment” the fan experience? A model of enjoyment for sports spectators. Journal of Sports Media, 12(2), 25–44.
17.
RosenbergL. B. (2015). Human swarming, a real-time method for parallel distributed intelligence. Paper presented at Swarm/Human Blended Intelligence Workshop, Cleveland, OH.
18.
RyanR. M., & DeciE. L. (2000). The darker and brighter sides of human existence: Basic psychological needs as a unifying concept. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 319–338.
19.
SalanovaM., AgutS., & PeiróJ. M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1217.
20.
SarnoD. (2014). Don’t take warren Buffett’s bracket challenge. Slate.com. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/articles/sports/sports_nut/2014/03/billion_dollar_bracket_challenge_why_it_s_a_bad_idea_to_enter_warren_buffett.html
21.
SecundoG., DumayJ., SchiumaG., & PassianteG. (2016). Managing intellectual capital through a collective Intelligence approach: An integrated framework for universities. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(2). DOI: 10.1108/JIC-05-2015-0046
22.
SeeleyT. D. (2010). Honeybee democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
SurowieckiJ. (2005). The wisdom of crowds. New York, NY: Anchor.
24.
TamboriniR., BowmanN. D., EdenA. L., & GrizzardM. (2010). Defining media enjoyment as the satisfaction of intrinsic needs. Journal of Communication, 60, 758–777.
25.
Van ScotterJ. R., & MotowidloS. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 525.
26.
WolfM., KrauseJ., CarneyP. A., BogartA., & KurversR. H. (2015). Collective intelligence meets medical decision-making: The collective outperforms the best radiologist. PLoS One, 10(8). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134269
27.
WoolleyA. W., ChabrisC. F., PentlandA., HashmiN., & MaloneT. W. (2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330(6004), 686–688. DOI: 10.1126/science.1193147
