Social presence is a theory derived from social psychology to explain social interactions in a mediated communication and is defined as the degree to which interlocutors in a communications medium perceive each other as real. This study investigates the effect of computer-mediated communication on the social presence of international students who spoke English as a foreign language in two Web-based graduate courses offered in the United States and aims to explore how linguistic and cultural differences influenced their social presence.
Abdullah, M. (1999). An examination of social presence cues in online conferences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
2.
Andrusyszyn, M.A., Iwasiw, C., & Goldenberg, D. (1999). Computer conferencing in graduate nursing education: Perceptions of students and faculty. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 30, 272-278.
3.
Bruffee, K.A. (1984). Background and history to collaborative learning inAmerican colleges. College English, 46, 635-652.
4.
Cakir, H., Bichelmeyer, B.A., & Cagiltay, K. (2002). Effects of cultural differences on e-mail communication . Paper presented at the CATAC'02 Conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
5.
Cornelius, C., & Boos, M. (2003). Enhancing mutual understanding in synchronous computer-mediated communication by training. Communication Research, 30, 147-177
6.
Dabbagh, N. (2004). Distance learning: Emerging pedagogical issues and learning designs. Quarterly Review of Distance Education , 5(1), 37-49.
7.
deGreef, P., & Iljsselteijn, W. (2000). Social presence in the phoshare tele application. Paper presented at the Presence 2000, Techniek Museum, Delft, the Netherlands.
8.
Duffy, T.M., & Jonassen, D.H. (1992). Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Garrison, R.D. (1997). Computer conferencing: The post-industrial age of distance education. Open Learning, 12(2), 3-11.
10.
Gunawardena, C. (1994). Collaborative learning and group dynamics in computer-mediated communication networks. Paper presented at the Second American Symposium in Research in Distance Education, American Center for the Study of Distance Education, Pennsylvania State University.
11.
Gunawardena, C.N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-26.
12.
Gunawardena, C.N., & Zittle, F.J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 9-26.
13.
Harasim, L. (1987). Teaching and learning online: Issues in designing computer-mediated graduate courses. Canadian Journal of Educational Communications, 16, 117-135.
14.
Harasim, L. (1990). On-line education: Perspectives on a new environment . New York: Praeger.
15.
Holsti, O.R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities . Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16.
Johnson, D.W. (1981). Student-student interaction: The neglected variable in education. Educational Research, 10, 5-10.
17.
Johnson, G. (2006). Synchronous and asynchronous text-based CMC in educational contexts: A review of recent research. TechTrends: Linking Research of Practice to Improve Learning, 50(4), 46-53.
18.
Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1992). Paralanguage and social perception in computer mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing , 2, 321-341.
19.
Ma, R. (1996). Computer mediated conversations as a new dimension of intercultural communication between East Asian and North American college students. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer mediated communication (pp. 173-185). Chicago: John Benjamin.
20.
MacGregor, J. (1990). Collaborative learning: Shared inquiry as a process of reform. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 42, 19-30.
21.
Markel, S.L. (2001). Technology and education online discussion forums: It's in the response. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 4(2). Available online at http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer42/markel42.html
22.
Picciano, A.G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6, 21-30. Available online at http://www.sloan-c-wiki.org/JALN/v6n1/pdf/v6n1_picciano.pdf
23.
Poole, D. (2000). Student participation in a discussion-oriented online course: A case study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 162-177.
24.
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D.R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conference. Journal of Distance Education, 14, 50-71.
25.
Salmon, G. (2002). Mirror, mirror, on my screen . . . Exploring online reflections. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 379-391.
26.
Short, J.A., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.
27.
Swan, K. (2003). Developing social presence in online discussions . In S. Naidue (Ed.), Learning and teaching with technology: Principles and practices (pp. 147-164). London: Kogan Page.
28.
Tan, S., Yeo, A. & Lim, W. (2005). Changing epistemology of science learning through inquiry with computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24, 367-386.
29.
Tarone, E. (1980). Communication strategies, foreigner talk, and repair in interlanguage. Language Learning, 30, 417-429.
30.
Tu, C. (2001). How Chinese perceive social presence: An examination of interaction in online learning environments. Education Media International, 38(1), 45-60.
31.
Vrasidas, C., & Zembylas, M. (2003). The nature of technology-mediated interaction in globalized distance education. International Journal of Training and Development, 7(4), 1-16.
32.
Walther, J.B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90.
33.
Wegerif, R. (1998). The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(1), 34-49.
34.
Woods, R., & Ebersole, S. (2003). Becoming a "communal architect" in the online classroom- Integrating cognitive and affective learning for maximum effect in web-based learning. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 6(1). Available online at www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring61/woods61.htm