Growing diversity among international students requires analysis of the experience of particular groups of international students, which would provide implications to understand other groups of students. Changes in the society encouraged the Japanese to seek professional training on postgraduate courses in Japan as well as overseas. Employing a qualitative approach, semistructured interviews were conducted with mature Japanese students and staff to illustrate how these students negotiate their experiences. Among several findings identified in the research are the gaps in assumptions among stakeholders of international higher education. The stakeholders appear not to appreciate fully that these students learn from their experience and improve in four competencies: knowledge, communication, academic expectation, and learning from experience. The research reveals the potential of training courses on the awareness of these assumptions, and the crucial role of institutional leadership of universities to implement these training courses for staff and students.
Althen, G. ( 1994). Recurring issues in intercultural communication . In G. Althen (Ed.), Learning across cultures (pp. 185-197). Washington, DC: National Association of International Education.
2.
Barker, J. ( 1997). The purpose of study and staff-student relationship . In D. McNamara & R. Harris (Eds.), Overseas students in Higher Education-Issues in teaching and learning (pp. 108-123). London: Routledge.
3.
Barnlund, D. ( 1989). Communicative styles of Japanese and Americans: Images and realities. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth .
4.
Bloland, P.A. ( 1992). Qualitative research in student affairs (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED347487). Retrieved March 28, 2009, from http://www.ericdigests.org/1992-3/qualitative.htm
5.
Byram, M. ( 1988). Cultural studies in foreign language education . Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters .
6.
Cammish, N. ( 1997). Through a glass darkly: Problems of studying at advanced level through the medium of English. In D. McNamara & R. Harris (Eds.), Overseas students in higher education-Issues in teaching and learning (pp. 143-155). London: Routledge.
7.
Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. ( 1997). Communication for learning across culture. In D. McNamara & R. Harris (Eds.) Overseas students in higher education-Issues in teaching and learning (pp. 76-90). London: Routledge.
8.
Cranton, P. ( 1992). Working with adult learners. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Wall and Emerson.
9.
Elsey, B. ( 1990). Teaching and learning. In M. Kinnell (Ed.), The learning experiences of overseas students (pp. 46-62). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
10.
Gudykunst, W. ( 1998). Bridging differences: Effective intergroup communication . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Habu, T. ( 2000). The irony of globalization: The experience of Japanese women in British higher education. Higher Education , 39, 43-66.
12.
Hammersley, M. ( 1992). What’s wrong with ethnography?-Methodological explorations . London: Routledge .
13.
Harris, R. ( 1995). Overseas students in the United Kingdom university system . Higher Education, 29, 77-92.
14.
Harris, R. ( 1997). Overseas students in the United Kingdom university system-A perspective from social work. In D. McNamara & R. Harris (Eds.), Overseas students in higher education-Issues in teaching and learning (pp. 30-45). London : Routledge.
15.
Humfrey, C. ( 1999). Managing international students. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
16.
Huntley, H.S. ( 1993). Adult international students: Problems of adjustment (ERIC ED355 886 Information Analysis). Retrieved March 28, 2009, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/13/a0/af.pdf
17.
Jin, L., & Cortazzi, M. ( 1993). Cultural orientation and academic language use . In D. Graddol, L. Thompson, & M. Byram (Eds.), Language and culture (pp. 84-97). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
18.
Jin, L., & Cortazzi , M. (1998). The culture the learner brings: A bridge or barrier? In M. Byram & M. Fleming (Eds.), Language learning in intercultural perspective: Approaches through drama and ethnography (pp. 98-118). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Kinoshita, A. ( 1998). Anxiety levels among Japanese students onAmerican campus. NACADA Journal, 18(1), 27-33.
20.
Kramsch, C., & Murphy-Lejeune, E. (1996). Why should language teachers teach culture? Language, Culture and Curriculum, 9(1), 99-107.
21.
Lewis, I. ( 1984). The student experience of higher education. London: Croom Helm.
22.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. ( 1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London : Sage.
23.
Littlewood, W. ( 1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts . Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 71-94.
24.
Mertens, D.M. ( 1998). Research methodology in education and psychology-Integrating diversity with quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage.
25.
Mezirow, J., & Associates. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
26.
Murphy, E., Dingwall, R., Greatbatch, D., Parker, S., & Watson, P. ( 1998). Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: A review of the literature. Health Technology Assessment, 2(16), 276.
27.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. ( 1998). Basics of qualitative research-Techniques and procedures for grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
28.
Teichler, U. ( 1996). Research on academic mobility and international cooperation in higher education: An agenda for the future. In P. Blumenthal, C. Goodwin , A. Smith, & U. Teichler (Eds.), Academic mobility in a changing world: Regional and global trends (pp. 338-358). London: Jessica Kingsley.
