“Strong experiences of music”—to use Alf Gabrielsson’s (2011) term—commonly, but apparently paradoxically, seem to involve people in both losing themselves and finding themselves in music. How can this be? Who or what is lost, and, equally, who or what is found, and how can they both happen together? In this paper I offer an approach to these questions, framed within the perspectives of musical consciousness and musical subjectivity, that attempts to bring together perceptual, emotional and embodied components of musical experience, embedded in the ecology of everyday listening. In doing so, I also argue for the importance of paying proper attention to phenomenological qualities of listeners’ experiences, for the historically specific and changing nature of human subjectivity experienced through music, and for a dynamic and animated understanding of musical engagement.
AhmedS.StaceyJ. (Eds.). (2001). Thinking through the skin. London: Routledge.
2.
BatesonG. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BeckerJ. (2004). Deep listeners: Music, emotion and trancing. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
4.
BergerP. L.LuckmannT. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
5.
ButlerJ. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.
6.
ButlerJ. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. New York: Routledge.
7.
ButtJ. (2010a). Emotion in the German Lutheran Baroque and the development of subjective time consciousness. Music Analysis, 29, 19–36.
8.
ButtJ. (2010b). Bach’s dialogue with modernity: Perspectives on the Passions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
ClarkA. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
ClarkeE. F. (2005). Ways of listening: An ecological approach to the perception of musical meaning. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
ClarkeE. F. (2007). The impact of recording on listening. Twentieth century music, 4, 47–70.
12.
ClarkeE. F. (2011). Music perception and musical consciousness. In ClarkeD.ClarkeE. F. (Eds.), Music and consciousness: Philosophical, psychological and cultural perspectives (pp. 193–213). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
ClarkeE. F. (2012). What’s going on: Music, psychology and ecological theory. In ClaytonM.HerbertT.MiddletonR. (Eds.), The cultural study of music: A critical introduction (2nd ed., pp. 333–342). London: Routledge.
14.
ClarkeE. F. (2013). Music, space and subjectivity. In BornG. (Ed.), Music, sound and space: Transformations of public and private experience (pp. 90–110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
CochraneT. (2011). Using the persona to express complex emotions in music. Music Analysis, 29, 264–275.
16.
CummingN. (1997). The subjectivities of “Erbarme dich.”Music Analysis, 16, 5–44.
17.
DamasioA. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body, emotion and the making of consciousness. London: Heinemann.
18.
DeighJ. (2010). Concepts of emotion in modern philosophy and psychology. In GoldieP. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy (pp. 17–40). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DeNoraT. (2000). Music in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
DeNoraT. (2003). After Adorno: Rethinking music sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
DeNoraT. (2013). Music asylums: Wellbeing through music in everyday life. Farnham: Ashgate.
23.
DibbenN. (2001). What do we hear when we hear music? Musical perception and musical materials. Musicae Scientiae, 5, 161–194.
24.
DriverJ. (2001). A selective review of selective attention research from the past century. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 53–78.
25.
EdelmanG. (1989). The remembered present: A biological theory of consciousness. New York: Basic Books.
26.
EliotT. S. (1943). Four quartets. New York: Harcourt.
27.
GabrielssonA. (2010). Strong experiences with music. In JuslinP. N.SlobodaJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, research, applications (pp. 547–574). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
GabrielssonA. (2011). Strong experiences with music (BradburyR.Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
GallagherS. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
GallopJ. (1988). Thinking through the body. New York: Columbia University Press.
31.
GibsonJ. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
32.
GrittenA. (2011). Distraction in polyphonic gesture. In GrittenA.KingE. (Eds.), New perspectives on music and gesture (pp. 99–122). Farnham: Ashgate.
33.
GroszE. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. St. Leonards, NSW: Allen and Unwin.
34.
HeftH. (2001). Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James’s radical empiricism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35.
HerbertR. (2011). Everyday music listening: Absorption, dissociation and trancing. Farnham: Ashgate.
36.
HeyesC. (2010). Where do mirror neurons come from?Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 575–583.
37.
JackendoffR. (1991). Musical parsing and musical affect. Music Perception, 9, 199–230.
38.
JuslinP. N. (2013). From everyday emotions to aesthetic emotions: Towards a unified theory of musical emotions. Physics of Life Reviews, 10, 235–266.
39.
JuslinP. N.SlobodaJ. A. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, research, applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
KramerL. (2001). The mysteries of animation: History, analysis and musical subjectivity. Music Analysis, 20, 153–178.
41.
KramerL. (2003). Subjectivity rampant! Music, hermeneutics, and history. In ClaytonM.HerbertT.MiddletonR. (Eds.), The cultural study of music: A critical introduction (pp. 124–135). London: Routledge.
42.
McClaryS. (2004). Modal subjectivities: Self-fashioning in the Italian madrigal. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
43.
McGuinessA.OveryK. (2011). Music, consciousness, and the brain: Music as shared experience of an embodied present. In ClarkeD.ClarkeE. F. (Eds.), Music and consciousness: Philosophical, psychological and cultural perspectives (pp. 245–262). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
Merleau-PontyM. (2005). Phenomenology of perception (SmithC.Trans.). London: Routledge. (Original work published asPhénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard, 1945.)
Peñalba AcitoresA. (2011). Towards a theory of proprioception as a bodily basis for consciousness in music. In ClarkeD.ClarkeE. F. (Eds.), Music and consciousness: Philosophical, psychological, and cultural perspectives (pp. 215–230). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
PiagetJ. (1970). Genetic epistemology (DuckworthE., Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
48.
RamachandranV. S. (2000). Mirror neurons and imitation learning as the driving force behind “the great leap forward” in human evolution. Retrieved from http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge69.html
49.
SchachterS.SingerJ. (1962). Cognitive, social and physiological determinants of emotion state. Psychological Review, 69, 379–399.
50.
SmithG. (1995). Lost in music. London: Picador.
51.
SpitzerM. (Ed.). (2011). Music and emotion [Special issue]. Music Analysis, 29(1–3).
52.
StrunkO.TreitlerL. (Eds.). (1998). Source readings in music history. New York: Norton.
53.
StuartS. A. J. (2011). Enkinaesthesia: The fundamental challenge for machine consciousness. International Journal of Machine Consciousness, 3, 145–162.
54.
WattR. J.AshR. L. (1998). A psychological investigation of meaning in music. Musicae Scientiae, 2, 33–54.
55.
WindsorW. L. (2004). An ecological approach to semiotics. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 34 (2), 179–198.
56.
WindsorW. L.de BézenacC. (2012). Music and affordances, Musicae Scientiae, 16(1), 102–120.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
