The implementation of peer review by Australia’s two largest accountancy professional bodies during the 1990s provides a case study in which the interaction of the public interest and self-interest is examined. It is argued that on occasions where individual self-interest of members conflicts with self-interest of the collective, the public interest motivates a way forward.
SmithersD (1992) President’s message. Charter, July, pp. 8–13.
58.
The Chartered Accountant in Australia (1987) Creative accounting. The Chartered Accountant in Australia, May, pp. 42–48.
59.
WaldronB (1991) From the President. Australian Accountant, April, p. 3.
60.
WoolfE (1987) A new dimension in professional practice regulation. The Chartered Accountant in Australia, August, pp. 28–29.
61.
AnnisetteMTrivediVU (2013) Globalization, paradox and the (un)making of identities: Immigrant chartered accountants of India in Canada. Accounting, Organizations and Society38(1): 1–29.
62.
BarberB (1963) Is American business becoming professionalized? Analysis of social ideology. In: TiryakianEA (ed.) Sociological Theory, Values and Sociological Change. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press of Glencoe, pp. 121–145.
63.
BédardJ (2001) The disciplinary process of the accounting profession: Protecting the public or the profession? The Quebec experience. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy20(4–5): 399–437.
64.
BivinsTH (1993) Public relations, professionalism, and the public interest. Journal of Business Ethics12(2): 117–126.
65.
BurchellSClubbCHopwoodAGHughesJNahapietJ (1980) The roles of accounting in organizations and society. Accounting, Organizations and Society5(1): 5–27.
66.
BurgeG (1987) ICA to crack down on ‘creative accounting’. Sydney Morning Herald, 6May, p. 42.
67.
CanningMO’DwyerB (2001) Professional accounting bodies’ disciplinary procedures: Accountable, transparent and in the public interest?European Accounting Review10(4): 725–749.
68.
CanningMO’DwyerB (2003) A critique of the descriptive power of the private interest model of professional accounting ethics: An examination over time in the Irish context. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal16(2): 159–185.
69.
CanningMO’DwyerB (2006) The influence of the ‘organisation’ on the logics of action-pervading disciplinary decision making: The case of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland (ICAI). Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal19(1): 17–46.
70.
CarnegieGDO’ConnellB (2010) Accounting scandals in Australia since the late 1980s. In: JonesMJ (ed.) Creative Accounting, Fraud and International Accounting Scandals. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 135–161.
71.
CarnegieGDNapierCJ (2010) Traditional accountants and business professionals: Portraying the accounting profession after Enron. Accounting, Organizations and Society35(3): 360–376.
72.
Carr-SaundersAMWilsonPA (1964) The Professions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73.
ClarkeFDeanGOliverK (2003) Corporate Collapse: Accounting, Regulatory and Ethical Failure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74.
DurkheimE (1957) Professional Ethics and Civic Morals. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
75.
DyckmanTR (1974) Public accounting: Guild or profession? In: SterlingRR (ed.) Institutional Issues in Public Accounting: Papers and Responses from Accounting Colloquium III. Lawrence, KS: Scholars Book Co., pp. 189–210.
76.
EzzamelMRobsonK (2009) Accounting. In: AlvessonMBridgmanTWillmottH (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press., pp. 473-500.
77.
FisherJGunzSMcCutcheonJ (2001) Private/public interest and the enforcement of a code of professional conduct. Journal of Business Ethics31(3): 191–207.
78.
HammondT (1997) From complete exclusion to minimal inclusion: African Americans and the public accounting industry, 1965–1988. Accounting, Organizations and Society22(1): 29–53.
79.
KrauseEA (1996) Death of the Guilds: Professions, States, and the Advance of Capitalism, 1930 to the Present. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
80.
LarsonMS (1977) The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
81.
LeeT (1995) The professionalization of accountancy: A history of protecting the public interest in a self-interested way. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal8(4): 48–69.
82.
LindblomCKRulandRG (1997) Functionalist and conflict views of AICPA code of conduct: Public interest vs. self interest. Journal of Business Ethics16(5): 573–582.
83.
MacdonaldKM (1995) The Sociology of the Professions. London: SAGE.
84.
MacIntyreS (2012) Australia: History. In: Europa Publications Limited(Ed) The Far East and Australasia 2012. 43rd ed.London: Europa Publications, pp. 68–80.
85.
MillersonG (1964) The Qualifying Associations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
86.
MitchellAPuxtyTSikkaPWillmottHC (1994) Ethical statements as smokescreens for sectional interests. Journal of Business Ethics13(1): 39–51.
87.
O’ConnellBWebbLSchwarzbachHR (2005) Batten down the hatches! U.S. accounting scandals and lessons for Australia. Australian Accounting Review15(2): 52–67.
88.
ParkerLD (1994) Professional accounting body ethics: In search of the private interest. Accounting, Organizations and Society19(6): 507–525.
89.
PichlerJA (1974) An economic analysis of accounting power. In: SterlingRR (ed.) Institutional Issues in Public Accounting: Papers and Responses from Accounting Colloquium III. Lawrence, KS: Scholars Book Co., pp. 45–73.
90.
PortwoodDFieldingA (1981) Privilege and the professions. The Sociological Review29(4): 749–773.
91.
PoullaosC (2008) Professionalisation. In: EdwardsRJWalkerSP (eds) Routledge Companion to Accounting History. London: Routledge, pp. 247–273.
92.
PrestonAMCooperDScarboroughDPChiltonRC (1995) Changes in the code of ethics of the U.S. accounting profession, 1917 and 1988: The continual quest for legitimation. Accounting, Organizations and Society20(6): 507–546.
SaksM (1995) Professions and the Public Interest: Medical Power, Altruism and Alternative Medicine. London: Routledge.
95.
SikkaP (2001) Transparency and accountability of the professional accountancy bodies: Some observations on the Canning and O’Dwyer paper. European Accounting Review10(4): 751–761.
96.
SikkaPWillmottHLoweEA (1989) Guardians of knowledge and public interest: Evidence and issues of accountability in the UK accountancy profession. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal2(2): 47–71.
97.
WalkerSPShackletonK (1998) A ring fence for the profession: Advancing the closure of British accountancy 1957–1970. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal11(1): 34–71.
98.
WillmottH (1985) Setting accounting standards in the UK: The emergence of private accounting bodies and their role in the regulation of public accounting practice. In: StreeckWSchmitterPC (eds) Private Interest Government. London: SAGE, pp. 44–71.
99.
WillmottH (1986) Organising the profession: A theoretical and historical examination of the development of the major accountancy bodies in the U.K. Accounting, Organizations and Society11(6): 555–580.
100.
ZeffSA (2003) How the U.S. accounting profession got where it is today: Part II. Accounting Horizons17(4): 267–286.
