This study analyses firms’ labour demand when employers have at least some monopsony power. It is argued that without taking into account (quasi-)monopsonistic structures of the labour market, wrong predictions are made about the effects of minimum wages. Using switching fractional panel probit regressions with German establishment data, I find that slightly more than 80% of establishments exercise some degree of monopsony power in their demand for low-skilled workers. The outcome suggests that a 1% increase in payments for low-skilled workers would, in these firms, increase employment for this group by 1.12%, while firms without monopsony power reduce the number of low-skilled, by about 1.63% for the same increase in remuneration. The study can probably also be used to explain the limited employment effects of the introduction of a statutory minimum wage in Germany and thus leads to a better understanding of the labour market for low-skilled workers.
AddisonJTBellmannLSchankT, et al. (2008) The demand for labour: An analysis using matched employer–employee data from the German LIAB. Will the high unskilled worker own-wage elasticity please stand up?Journal of Labour Research29(2): 114–137.
2.
AzarJMarinescuISteinbaumM, et al. (2020) Concentration in US labour markets: Evidence from online vacancy data. Labour Economics66: 101886.
3.
BelmanDWolfsonP (2014) What does the minimum wage do?Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
4.
BenmelechEBergmanNKimH (2018) Strong employers and weak employees: How does employer concentration affect wages? NBER Working Paper No. w24307 Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
5.
BergerDWHerkenhoffKFMongeyS (2019) Labour Market Power. NBER Working Paper No. w25719. Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
6.
BoalWMRansomMR (1997) Monopsony in the labour market. Journal of Economic Literature35(1): 86–112.
7.
BoninHIsphordingIEAnnabelleKP, et al. (2019) The German statutory minimum wage and its effects on regional employment and unemployment. IZA Policy Paper No. 145. Bonn: Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
8.
BosslerMGernerHD (2020) Employment effects of the new German minimum wage. Evidence from establishment-level micro data. ILR Review73(5): 1070–1094.
9.
BrenzelHCzepekJKubisA, et al. (2016) Neueinstellungen im Jahr 2015: Stellen werden häufig über persönliche Kontakte besetzt. IAB-Kurzbericht 4/2016. Nuremberg: Institute of Employment Research (IAB).
10.
BruttelO (2019) The effects of the new statutory minimum wage in Germany: A first assessment of the evidence. Journal for Labour Market Research53: 10.
11.
CaliendoMFedoretsAPreussM, et al. (2018) The short-run employment effects of the German minimum wage reform. Labour Economics53: 46–62.
12.
CardDHeiningJKlineP (2015) CHK effects. FDZ Methodenreport No. 06/2015. Nuremberg, Germany: Research Data Centre (FDZ), Institute of Employment Research (IAB).
13.
CardDKruegerA (1994) Minimum wages and employment: A case study of the New Jersey and Pennsylvania fast food industries. American Economic Review84(4): 772–793.
14.
CardDKruegerAB (1995) Myth and Measurement. New Economics of the Minimum Wage. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
ChamberlainG (1982) Multivariate regression models for panel data. Journal of Econometrics18(1): 5–46.
16.
ChletsosMGiotisGP (2015) The employment effect of minimum wage using 77 international studies since 1992: A meta-analysis. MPRA Paper No. 61321. Munich, Germany: Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA).
17.
de Linde LeonardMStanleyTDDoucouliagosH (2014) Does the UK minimum wage reduce employment? A meta‐regression analysis. British Journal of Industrial Relations52(3): 499–520.
18.
DepewBSoerensenTA (2013) The elasticity of labour supply to the firm over the business cycle. Labour Economics24: 196–204.
19.
DubeAJacobsJNaiduS, et al. (2018) Monopsony in online labour markets. NBER Working Paper No. w24416. Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
20.
EberleJSchmuckerA (2017) The establishment history panel–redesign and update 2016. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 237(6): 535–547.
21.
FalchT (2017) Wages and recruitment: Evidence from external wage changes. ILR Review70(2): 483–518.
22.
FischerGJanikFMüllerD, et al (2008) The IAB Establishment Panel – From sample to survey to projection. FDZ Methodenreport No. 01/2008. Nuremberg, Germany: Research Data Centre (FDZ), Institute of Employment Research (IAB).
23.
FischerGJanikFMüllerD, et al. (2009) The IAB Establishment panel–things users should know. Journal of Applied Social Science Studies129(1): 133–148.
24.
GarloffA (2019) Did the German minimum wage reform influence (un) employment growth in 2015? Evidence from regional data. German Economic Review20(3): 356–381.
25.
HafnerMTaylorJPankowskaP, et al. (2017) The impact of the national minimum wage on employment: a meta-analysis. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
26.
HamermeshDS (1993) Labour Demand. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
HerrHHerzog-SteinAKromphardtJ, et al. (2017) Mindestlohns aus keynesianisch geprägter Perspektive. Studie im Auftrag der Mindestlohnkommission. Düsseldorf, Germany: Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK).
28.
Herzog-SteinALübkerMPuschT, et al. (2020) Fünf jahre mindestlohn-erfahrungen und perspektiven: Gemeinsame stellungnahme von IMK und WSI anlässlich der schriftlichen anhörung der mindestlohnkommission 2020. WSI Policy Brief No, 42. Düsseldorf, Germany: Institute of Economic and Social Research
29.
HeiseA (2020) Minimum wages and the resilience of neoclassical labour market economics: Some preliminary evidence from Germany. Hamburg: ZÖSS Discussion Paper, 77. Hamburg, Germany: Center for Economic and Sociological Studies (ZÖSS)
30.
HeiseAPuschT (2020) Introducing minimum wages in Germany employment effects in a post Keynesian perspective. Journal of Evolutionary Economics30(5): 1515–1532.
31.
HershbeinBMacalusoCYehC (2019) Monopsony and concentration in the labour market: Evidence from vacancy and employment data. Paper presented at the NBER Summer Institute 2019 – Conference on Research in Income and Wealth. https://conference.nber.org/conf_papers/f122998.pdf (accessed July 15th, 2021).
32.
HirschBJahnEJ (2015) Is there monopsonistic discrimination against immigrants?ILR Review68(3): 501–528.
33.
HirschBJahnEJSchnabelC (2018) Do employers have more monopsony power in slack labour markets?ILR Review71(3): 676–704.
34.
JaroschGNimczikJSSorkinI (2019) Granular search, market structure, and wages. NBER Working Paper No. w26239. Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
35.
JungYCMcFarlaneADasA (2020) The effect of minimum wages on consumption in Canada. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304620949950.
36.
KnabeASchöbE (2009) Minimum wage incidence: The case for Germany. FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis64(4): 403–441.
37.
KnabeASchöbRThumM (2014) Der flächendeckende mindestlohn. Perspektiven der wirtschaftspolitik, 15(2): 133–157.
38.
KöllingA (2012) Firm size and employment dynamics: Estimations of labour demand elasticities using a fractional panel probit model. Labour26(2): 174–207.
39.
KöllingA (2020) The statutory minimum wage in Germany and the labor demand elasticities of low-skilled workers: A regression discontinuity approach with establishment panel data. GLO Discussion Paper No. 687. Global Labor Organization (GLO).
40.
LichterAPeichlASieglochS (2015) The own-wage elasticity of labour demand: A meta-regression analysis. European Economic Review80: 94–119.
41.
LukiyanovaAVishnevskayaN (2016) Decentralisation of the minimum wage setting in Russia: Causes and consequences. The Economic and Labour Relations Review27(1): 98–117.
42.
ManningA (2003) Monopsony in motion: Imperfect competition in labour markets. Princeton, MA: Princeton University Press.
43.
ManningA (2006) A generalised model of monopsony. The Economic Journal, 116(508): 84–100.
44.
ManningA (2011) Imperfect competition in the labour market. In: Handbook of Labour Economics, Vol. 4, pp. 973-1041. San Diego, California: Elsevier.
45.
ManningA (2021) Monopsony in labour markets: A review. ILR Review. 74(1): 3–26.
46.
MéndezFSepúlvedaF (2019) Monopsony power in occupational labour markets. Journal of Labour Research40(4): 387–411.
47.
MundlakY (1978) On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica46(1): 69–85.
48.
NeumarkDWascherW (1994) Minimum wage effects and low-wage labour markets: A disequilibrium approach. NBER Working Paper No. w4617. Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
49.
NeumarkDSalasJIWascherW (2014) More on recent evidence on the effects of minimum wages in the United States. IZA Journal of Labour Policy3(1): 24.
50.
PapkeLEWooldridgeJM (2008) Panel data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates. Journal of Econometrics145(1–2): 121–133.
51.
WebberDA (2016) Firm‐level monopsony and the gender pay gap. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 55(2): 323–345.
52.
WooldridgeJM (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press.
53.
WooldridgeJM (2015) Control function methods in applied econometrics. Journal of Human Resources50(2): 420–445.
54.
WooldridgeJM (2019) Correlated random effects models with unbalanced panels. Journal of Econometrics211(1): 137–150.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
