The Human Capital Sustainability Leadership (HCSL) framework integrates ethical, mindful, servant, and sustainable leadership to promote well-being and organizational resilience. Despite growing international interest, no validation studies have been conducted in Latin America. This study aimed to adapt and validate the Human Capital Sustainability Leadership Scale (HCSLS) for use with leaders in Argentina. Data were collected from 202 leaders (51% men, 49% women) across diverse sectors. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a second-order factor model with strong fit indices. The scale demonstrated high internal consistency, and Mokken analysis indicated moderate to strong item scalability. Convergent validity was evidenced through positive associations with work performance and relational civility, and negative correlations with burnout indicators. Overall, findings support the HCSLS as a reliable and valid tool for assessing sustainability-oriented leadership practices in Argentina, providing a culturally grounded instrument for leadership development and research in multiple organizational contexts.
AguinisH.VillamorI.LazzariniS. G.VassoloR. S.AmorósJ. E.AllenD. G. (2020). Conducting management research in Latin America: Why and what’s in it for you?Journal of Management, 46(5), 615–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320901581
2.
AvolioB. J.BassB. M. (2004). MLQ: Multifactor leadership questionnaire. Mind Garden.
3.
BassB. M.AvolioB. (1990). Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Consulting Psychologists Press.
4.
CainM. K.ZhangZ.YuanK.-H. (2017). Univariate and multivariate skewness and kurtosis for measuring nonnormality: Prevalence, influence and estimation. Behavior Research Methods, 49(5), 1716–1735. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0814-1
5.
CarrS.HopnerV.MeyerI.Di FabioA.ScottJ.MatuschekI.BlakeD.SaxenaM.SanerR.Lichia Saner-YiuL.MassolaG.AtkinsS. G.ReichmanW.SaltzmanJ.McWha-HermannI.TchagnenoC.SearleR.MukerjeeJ.BlusteinD.HaarJ. (2025). The wheel of work and the sustainable livelihoods index (SL-I). Sustainability, 17(14), 6295. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146295
6.
Castro SolanoA.Fernández LiporaceM. (2006). Teorías implícitas del liderazgo. Estructura factorial y generalizabilidad de una escala de atributos del líder en diferentes grupos. Boletin de Psicologia, 86(1), 85–107. https://www.uv.es/seoane/boletin/previos/N86-4.pdf
7.
Castro SolanoA.NaderM.CasulloM. M. (2004). La evaluación de los estilos de liderazgo en población civil y militar Argentina. Revista de Psicología, 22(1), 63–88. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.200401.004
8.
DienerE.WirtzD.TovW.Kim-PrietoC.ChoiD.OishiS.Biswas-DienerR. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
9.
Di FabioA. (2017). The psychology of sustainability and sustainable development for well-being in organizations. Frontiers in Psychology. Organizational Psychology, 8, 1534. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01534
10.
Di FabioA. (2022). Introduction. Well-being and sustainability in organizations through the flourishing of talents. In Di FabioA. (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives on well-being and sustainability in organizations (pp. 17–25). Springer.
11.
Di FabioA.BonfiglioA.PalazzeschiL.GoriA.SvicherA. (2023). Human capital sustainability leadership: From personality traits to positive relational management. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1110974. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1110974
12.
Di FabioA.CheungF.PeiróJ. M. (2020). Editorial to special issue “Personality and individual differences and healthy organizations”. Personality and Individual Differences, 166, 110196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110196
13.
Di FabioA.CooperC. L. (Eds.). (2023). Psychology of sustainability and sustainable development in organizations. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003212157
14.
Di FabioA.GoriA. (2016). Assessing Workplace Relational Civility (WRC) with a new multidimensional “mirror” measure. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 890. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00890
15.
Di FabioA.PeiróJ. M. (2018). Human capital sustainability leadership to promote sustainable development and healthy organizations: A new scale. Sustainability, 10(7), 2413. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072413
16.
Di FabioA.PeiróJ. M. (2023). Human capital sustainability leadership and healthy organizations: Its contribution to sustainable development. In Di FabioA.CooperC. L. (Eds.), Psychology of sustainability and sustainable development in organizations (pp. 93–103). Routledge Taylor & Francis.
17.
Di FabioA.RosenM. A. (2018). Opening the black box of psychological processes in the science of sustainable development: A new frontier. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 2(4), 47. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejosdr/3933
18.
Di FabioA.RosenM. A. (2020). An exploratory study of a new psychological instrument for evaluating sustainability: The Sustainable Development Goals Psychological Inventory. Sustainability MDPI, 12, 7617. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187617
19.
GabiniS. M.SalessiS. M. (2016). Validación de la escala de rendimiento laboral individual en trabajadores argentinos. Evaluar, 16(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v16.n1.15714
20.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
21.
HartungP.Di FabioA. (2024). Sustainable development: A fourth paradigm for twenty-first century careers. Australian Journal of Career Development, 33(3), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162241287739
22.
KennyM. E.Di FabioA.CarrS. C. (2023). Editorial special issue “career and sustainable working: Fostering decent work and decent lives”. Australian Journal of Career Development, 32(3), 183–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162231208585
23.
KennyM. E.Di FabioA.CarrS. C. (2024). Editorial Special Issue “Sustainable working, sustainable livelihoods, sustainable career: Fostering decent work, decent lives, and healthy lives”. Australian Journal of Career Development, 32(3), 183–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162231208585
24.
KhalilS. H.ShahS. M. A.KhalilS. M. (2021). Sustaining work outcomes through human capital sustainability leadership: Knowledge sharing behaviour as an underlining mechanism. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(7), 1119–1135. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-02-2021-0051
25.
KhattakS. I.HaiderA.AhmedS. K.RizviS. T. H.ShaokangL. (2022). Nexus of ethical leadership, career satisfaction, job embeddedness, and work engagement in hospitality industry: A sequential mediation assessment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 865899. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865899
KoopmansL.BernaardsC.HildebrandtV.van BuurenS.van der BeekA. J.de VetH. C. W. (2012). Development of an individual work performance questionnaire. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401311285273
28.
LawsonD.FleshmanJ. W. (2020). Informal leadership in health care. Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery, 33(04), 225–227. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709439
29.
OmarA.SalessiS.VaamondeJ. D. (2014). Validación Argentina de la Escala de Liderazgo Transformacional [Argentine validation of the Transformational Leadership Scale]. VIII Jornada de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Rosario. Conference Proceedings (electronic version).
30.
ParkJ.-H.ShinJ.-J.GauL.-S.KimJ.-C. (2025). Authentic leadership and subjective career success: The mediating roles of psychological safety and mindfulness in a sustainable work environment. Sustainability, 17(7), 2861. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17072861
31.
PeiróJ. M. (2025). Applied psychology and careers in the 21st century. Challenges and opportunities. Australian Journal of Career Development, 34(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162251350691
32.
PeiróJ. M.KozusznikM.MolinaI. R.TorderaN. (2019). The happy-productive worker model and beyond: Patterns of wellbeing and performance at work. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(3), 479. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030479
33.
PeiróJ. M.MontesaD.SorianoA.KozusznikM. W.VillajosE.MagdalenoJ.DjourovaN. P.AyalaY. (2021). Revisiting the happy-productive worker thesis from a eudaimonic perspective: A systematic review. Sustainability, 13(6), 3174. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063174
34.
PeiróJ. M.SvicherA.Di FabioA. (2023). Innovative behaviors and eudaimonic well-being: The contribution of human capital sustainability leadership to sustainable career, decent work, decent lives, and healthy lives. Australian Journal of Career Development, 32(3), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162231202224
Pozo MuñozC.Garzón UmerenkovaA.NietoB.CharryC. (2016). Propiedades psicométricas y dimensionalidad de “The Flourishing Scale” en población hispanohablante. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 14(28), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.38.15044
37.
Pujol-ColsL.Lazzaro-SalazarM. (2021). Ten years of research on psychosocial risks, health, and performance in Latin America: A comprehensive systematic review and research agenda. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 37(3), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2021a18
38.
Rodríguez-CarvajalR.de RivasS.HerreroM.Moreno-JiménezB.van DierendonckD. (2014). Leading people positively: Cross-cultural validation of the Servant Leadership Survey (SLS). The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17, E63. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2014.73
39.
Rodríguez-CifuentesF. (2023). The Workplace Relational Civility Scale. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version. Counseling. International Journal of Research and Intervention, 16(1), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.14605/CS1612305
40.
RosárioA. T.BoechatA. C. (2025). How sustainable leadership can leverage sustainable development. Sustainability, 17(8), 3499. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083499
41.
RosenM. A.Di FabioA. (2023). Psychology of sustainability and sustainable development in organizations: Empirical evidence from environment to safety to innovation and future research. In Di FabioA.CooperC. L. (Eds.), Psychology of sustainability and sustainable development in organizations (pp. 20–41). Routledge Taylor & Francis.
42.
SahleM.LahotiS. A.LeeS.-Y.BrundiersK.van RiperC. J.PohlC.ChienH.BohnetI. C.Aguilar-RiveraN.EdwardsP.PradhanP.PlieningerT.BoonstraW. J.FlorA. G.Di FabioA.ScheidelA.GordonC.AbsonD. J.AnderssonE., … Takeuchi, K. (2025). Revisiting the sustainability science research agenda. Sustainability Science, 20(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01586-3
43.
SajjadA.EwejeG.RaziqM. M. (2024). Sustainability leadership: An integrative review and conceptual synthesis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(4), 2849–2867. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3631
44.
SchaufeliW. B.DesartS.De WitteH. (2020). Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)—Development, validity, and reliability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9495. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249495
45.
SeokC. B.ChingP. L.IsmailR. (2021). Human Capital Sustainability Leadership Scale: Psychometric proprieties of the Malaysian version. In Di FabioA. (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives on well-being and sustainability in organizations (pp. 111–120). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86709-6_7
46.
SijtsmaK.van der ArkL. A. (2017). A tutorial on how to do a Mokken scale analysis on your test and questionnaire data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 70(1), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12078
47.
SorianoA.WarsickaH.PeiróJ. M. (2025). The burnout assessment tool (BAT): Validation in the Spanish population. WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 81(2), 2791–2800. https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815251320276
48.
TakeuchiK.OsamuS.LahotiS.GondorD. (2017). Growing up: 10 years of publishing sustainability science research. Sustainability Science, 12(6), 849–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0484-7
49.
TaniK.TsudaA.TanakaY.HashimotoS.ShiratakiY. (2025). Development and Validation of the Japanese Version of the Human Capital Sustainability Leadership Scale (HCSL-J). Japanese Psychological Research, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12607
50.
VaamondeJ. D.GiacobinoA. (2023). Psychometric Properties of the HSE Indicator Tool: Evidence from Argentina. Occupational Medicine, 73(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqad010
51.
van DierendonckD.NuijtenI. (2011). The Servant Leadership Survey: Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(3), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9194-1
