The present study analyzes the nexus among business growth, ownership structure, and local embeddedness—that is, the involvement of economic actors in a geographically bound social structure—in rural and urban contexts. This work combines regional economics with studies on family business and firm growth and uses a coarsened matched sample of privately held Swedish firms. The findings indicate that family firms benefit more than nonfamily firms from local embeddedness and as such they achieve higher levels of growth and that this effect is more pronounced in rural areas. Research implications are shared in the Conclusion section.
AchtenhagenL.MelinL.NaldiL. (2013) Dynamics of business models–strategizing, critical capabilities and activities for sustained value creation. Long Range Planning46(6): 427–442.
2.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991) Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
3.
Al-LahamA.SouitarisV. (2008) Network embeddedness and new-venture internationalization: Analyzing international linkages in the German biotech industry. Journal of Business Venturing23(5): 567–586.
4.
AnandJ.SinghH. (1997) Asset redeployment, acquisitions and corporate strategy in declining industries. Strategic Management Journal18(S1): 99–118.
5.
ArregleJ. L.BatjargalB.HittM. A.WebbJ. W.TsuiA. S. (2013) Family ties in entrepreneurs’ social networks and new venture growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice39(2): 313–344.
6.
ArregleJ. L.HittM. A.SirmonD. G.VeryP. (2007) The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies44(1): 73–95.
7.
AstrachanJ. H.ShankerM. C. (2003) Family businesses’ contribution to the US economy: A closer look. Family Business Review16(3): 211–219.
8.
AstrachanJ. H. (1988) Family firm and community culture. Family Business Review1(2): 165–189.
9.
AudretschD. B.DohseD. (2007) Location: A neglected determinant of firm growth. Review of World Economics143(1): 79–107.
10.
Backman, M. (2013). Regions, human capital and new firm formation (JIBS dissertation series No. 086). Jönköping: Jönköping International Business School.
11.
BackmanM.PalmbergJ. (2015) Contextualizing small family firms: How does the urban–rural context affect firm employment growth?Journal of Family Business Strategy6(4): 247–258.
12.
BaptistaR.PretoM. T. (2011) New firm formation and employment growth: Regional and business dynamics. Small Business Economics36(4): 419–442.
13.
BascoR. (2015) Family business and regional development—A theoretical model of regional familiness. Journal of Family Business Strategy6(4): 259–271.
14.
Benavides-VelascoC. A.Quintana-GarcíaC.Guzmán-ParraV. F. (2013) Trends in family business research. Small Business Economics40(1): 41–57.
15.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gómez-MejiaL. R. (2012) Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review25(3): 258–279.
16.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gómez-MejiaL. R.Larraza-KintanaM. (2010) Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less?Administrative Science Quarterly55(1): 82–113.
17.
BirdM.WennbergK. (2014) Regional influences on the prevalence of family versus non-family start-ups. Journal of Business Venturing29(3): 421–436.
18.
BjuggrenC. M.DaunfeldtS. O.JohanssonD. (2013) High-growth firms and family ownership. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship26(4): 365–385.
19.
BjuggrenC. M.JohanssonD.SjögrenH. (2011) A note on employment and gross domestic product in Swedish family-owned businesses: A descriptive analysis. Family Business Review24(4): 362–371.
20.
BlackwellM.IacusS.KingG.PorroG. (2009) Cem: Coarsened exact matching in Stata. Stata Journal9(4): 524.
21.
BlockJ. (2010) Family management, family ownership, and downsizing: Evidence from S&P 500 firms. Family Business Review23: 109–130.
22.
BlockJ. H.SpiegelF. (2013) Family firm density and regional innovation output: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Family Business Strategy4(4): 270–280.
23.
BoixR.TrullénJ. (2007) Knowledge, networks of cities and growth in regional urban systems. Papers in Regional Science86(4): 551–574.
24.
Box-SteffensmeierJ. M.JonesB. S. (2004) Event history modeling: A guide for social scientists, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
BradleyS. W.ShepherdD. A.WiklundJ. (2011) The importance of slack for new organizations facing ‘tough’ environments. Journal of Management Studies48(5): 1071–1097.
26.
BreiteneckerR. J.HarmsR.WeyhA.MareschD.KrausS. (2017) When the difference makes a difference–the regional embeddedness of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development29(1–2): 71–93.
27.
Cabrera-SuárezK.De Saá-PérezP.García-AlmeidaD. (2001) The succession process from a resource-and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review14(1): 37–46.
28.
CarnesC. M.IrelandR. D. (2013) Familiness and innovation: Resource bundling as the missing link. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice37(6): 1399–1419.
29.
CarneyM. (2005) Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family‐controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice29(3): 249–265.
30.
CarreeM. A.ThurikA. R. (2003) The impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth. In: AcsZ. J.AudretschD. B. (eds) Handbook of entrepreneurship research, New York, NY: Springer US, pp. 437–471.
31.
CasillasJ. C.MorenoA. M. (2010) The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and growth: The moderating role of family involvement. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development22(3–4): 265–291.
32.
CasillasJ. C.MorenoA. M.BarberoJ. L. (2010) A configurational approach of the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and growth of family firms. Family Business Review23(1): 27–44.
33.
ChangE. P.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.KellermannsF. W. (2008) Regional economy as a determinant of the prevalence of family firms in the United States: A preliminary report. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice32(3): 559–573.
34.
ChenW.-R. (2008) Determinants of firms’ backward- and forward-looking R&D search behavior. Organization Science19(4): 609–622.
35.
ChiricoF.IrelandR. D.SirmonD. G. (2011) Franchising and the family firm: Creating unique sources of advantage through “familiness”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice35(3): 483–501.
36.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.PearsonA. W.BarnettT. (2012) Family involvement, family influence, and family‐centered non‐economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice36(2): 267–293.
37.
CliffJ. E. (1998) Does one size fit all? Exploring the relationship between attitudes towards growth, gender, and business size. Journal of Business Venturing13(6): 523–542.
38.
CohenW. M.LevinthalD. (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administration Science Quarterly35: 128–152.
39.
ColomboM. G.De MassisA.PivaE.Rossi‐LamastraC.WrightM. (2014) Sales and employment changes in entrepreneurial ventures with family ownership: Empirical evidence from high‐tech industries. Journal of Small Business Management52(2): 226–245.
40.
ColomboM. G.GrilliL. (2005) Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view. Research Policy34(6): 795–816.
41.
CookeP. (2007) Social capital, embeddedness, and market interactions: An analysis of firm performance in UK regions. Review of Social Economy65(1): 79–106.
42.
CookeP.CliftonN.OleagaM. (2005) Social capital, firm embeddedness and regional development. Regional Studies39(8): 1065–1077.
43.
DahlM. S.SorensonO. (2012) Home sweet home: Entrepreneurs’ location choices and the performance of their ventures. Management Science58(6): 1059–1071.
44.
DailyC. M.DollingerM. J. (1992) An empirical examination of ownership structure in family and professionally managed firms. Family Business Review5(2): 117–136.
45.
DanesS. M.LeeJ.AmarapurkarS.StaffordK.HaynesG.BrewtonK. E. (2009) Determinants of family business resilience after a natural disaster by gender of business owner. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship14(04): 333–354.
46.
DaspitJ. J.HoltD. T.ChrismanJ. J.LongR. G. (2016) Examining family firm succession from a social exchange perspective: A multiphase, multistakeholder review. Family Business Review29(1): 44–64.
47.
DavidssonP.AchtenhagenL.NaldiL. (2010) Small firm growth. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship6(2): 69–166.
48.
DavidssonP.HonigB. (2003) The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing18(3): 301–331.
49.
DavidssonP.WiklundJ. (2006) Conceptual and empirical challenges in the study of firm growth. Entrepreneurship and the Growth of Firms1(1): 39–61.
50.
DawsonJ. F.RichterA. W. (2006) Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology91(4): 917.
51.
DeephouseD. L.JaskiewiczP. (2013) Do family firms have better reputations than non‐family firms? An integration of socioemotional wealth and social identity theories. Journal of Management Studies50(3): 337–360.
52.
De FigueiredoR. J. P.Meyer-DoyleP.RawleyE. (2013) Inherited agglomeration effects in hedge fund spawns. Strategic Management Journal34(7): 843–862.
53.
DelmarF. (1997) Measuring growth: Methodological considerations and empirical results. In: DonckelsR.MiettinenA. (eds) Entrepreneurship and SME research: On its way to the next millennium, Aldershot & Brookfield, VA: Ashgate, pp. 190–216.
54.
DelmarF.DavidssonP.GartnerW. B. (2003) Arriving at the high-growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing18(2): 189–216.
55.
DickenP.MalmbergA. (2001) Firms in territories: A relational perspective. Economic Geography77(4): 345–363.
56.
DurantonG.PugaD. (2004) Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. In: HendersonJ. V.ThisseJ.-F. (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economicsVol. 4, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 2063–2117.
57.
EddlestonK. A.KellermannsF. W.FloydS. W.CrittendenV. L.CrittendenW. F. (2013) Planning for growth: Life stage differences in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice37(5): 1177–1202.
58.
EisenhardtK. M.SchoonhovenC. B. (1990) Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Administrative Science Quarterly35(3): 504–529.
59.
FalkI.KilpatrickS. (2000) What is social capital? A study of interaction in a rural community. Sociologia Ruralis40(1): 87–110.
60.
FelzenszteinC.GimmonE.CarterS. (2010) Geographical co-location, social networks and inter-firm marketing co-operation: The case of the salmon industry. Long Range Planning43(5–6): 675–690.
61.
FinkelsteinS. (1992) Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal35(3): 505–538.
62.
FitzgeraldM. A.HaynesG. W.SchrankH. L.DanesS. M. (2010) Socially responsible processes of small family business owners: Exploratory evidence from the national family business survey. Journal of Small Business Management48(4): 524–551.
63.
GabeT. M.KraybillD. S. (2002) The effect of state economic development incentives on employment growth of establishments. Journal of Regional Science42(4): 703–730.
64.
GanotakisP. (2012) Founders’ human capital and the performance of UK new technology based firms. Small Business Economics39(2): 495–515.
65.
GedajlovicE.CarneyM. (2010) Markets, hierarchies, and families: Toward a transaction cost theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice34(6): 1145–1172.
66.
GeorgeG. (2005) Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms. Academy of Management Journal48(4): 661–676.
67.
GilbertB. A.McDougallP. P.AudretschD. B. (2006) New venture growth: A review and extension. Journal of Management32(6): 926–950.
68.
Gómez-MejiaL. R.CruzC.BerroneP.DeCastroJ. (2011) The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. The Academy of Management Annals5: 653–707.
69.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.HaynesK. T.Núñez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007) Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly52(1): 106–137.
70.
Gómez‐MejiaL. R.CampbellJ. T.MartinG.HoskissonR. E.MakriM.SirmonD. G. (2014) Socioemotional wealth as a mixed gamble: Revisiting family firm R&D investments with the behavioral agency model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice38(6): 1351–1374.
71.
GrabherG. (1993) The weakness of strong ties: The lock-in of regional development in Ruhr area. In: GrabherG. (ed.) The embedded firm: On the socioeconomics of industrial networks, London: Routledge, pp. 255–277.
72.
GranovetterM. S. (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360–1380.
73.
GrantR. M. (1991) The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review33(3): 114–135.
74.
HabbershonT. G.WilliamsM. L. (1999) A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review12(1): 1–25.
75.
HambrickD. C.MasonP. A. (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review9(2): 193–206.
76.
HamelinA. (2013) Influence of family ownership on small business growth. Evidence from French SMEs. Small Business Economics41(3): 563–579.
77.
HannanM. T.FreemanJ. (1977) The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology82(5): 929–964.
78.
HaynesG. W.WalkerR.RoweB. R.HongG. S. (1999) The intermingling of business and family finances in family-owned businesses. Family Business Review12(3): 225–239.
79.
HeckR. K. Z.OwenA. J.RoweB. R. (1995) Home-based employment and family life, Westport, CT: Auburn House.
80.
HessM. (2004) ‘Spatial’ relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embedded ness. Progress in Human Geography28(2): 165–186.
81.
HooverE. M.VernonR. (1959) Anatomy of a metropolis, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
82.
HoskissonR. E.ChiricoF.ZyungJ.GambetaE. (2017) Managerial risk taking: A multitheoretical review and future research agenda. Journal of Management43(1): 137–169.
83.
HugginsR.JohnstonA. (2009) Knowledge networks in an uncompetitive region: SME innovation and growth. Growth and Change40(2): 227–259.
84.
HugginsR.ThompsonP. (2014) A network-based view of regional growth. Journal of Economic Geography14(3): 511–545.
IacusS. M.KingG.PorroG. (2011) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis20(1): 1–24.
87.
JacobsJ. (1969) The economy of cities, New York, NY: Random House.
88.
JohannissonB.Ramírez-PasillasM.KarlssonG. (2002) The institutional embeddedness of local inter-firm networks: A leverage for business creation. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development14(4): 297–315.
89.
KeatsB. W.HittM. A. (1988) A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Academy of Management Journal31(3): 570–598.
90.
KimN.ImS.SlaterS. F. (2013) Impact of knowledge type and strategic orientation on new product creativity and advantage in high‐technology firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management30(1): 136–153.
91.
LeBreton-MillerI.MillerD.LesterR. H. (2011) Stewardship or agency? A social embeddedness reconciliation of conduct and performance in public family businesses. Organization Science22(3): 704–721.
92.
LesterR. H.CannellaA. A. (2006) Interorganizational familiness: How family firms use interlocking directorates to build community‐level social capital1. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30(6): 755–775.
93.
LongR. G.MathewsK. M. (2011) Ethics in the family firm: Cohesion through reciprocity and exchange. Business Ethics Quarterly21(2): 287–308.
94.
MartinG. P.Gomez-MejiaL. R.WisemanR. M. (2013) Executive stock options as mixed gambles: Revisiting the behavioral agency model. Academy of Management Journal56(2): 451–472.
95.
MaskellP. (2001) The firm in economic geography. Economic Geography77(4): 329–344.
96.
McKelvieA.WiklundJ. (2010) Advancing firm growth research: A focus on growth mode instead of growth rate. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice34(2): 261–288.
97.
MeccheriN.PelloniG. (2006) Rural entrepreneurs and institutional assistance: An empirical study from mountainous Italy. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development18(5): 371–392.
98.
MemiliE.FangH.ChrismanJ. J.DeMassisA. (2015) The impact of small-and medium-sized family firms on economic growth. Small Business Economics45(4): 771–785.
99.
MillerD.Breton‐MillerL.LesterR. H. (2011) Family and lone founder ownership and strategic behaviour: Social context, identity, and institutional logics. Journal of Management Studies48(1): 1–25.
100.
Miller, N. J., Fitzgerald, M. A., Winter, M., & Paul, J. (1999). Exploring the overlap of family and business demands: Household and family business managers' adjustment strategies. Family Business Review, 12(3), 253–268.
101.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2005) Management insights from great and struggling family businesses. Long Range Planning38(6): 517–530.
102.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI.LesterR. H.CannellaA. A. (2007) Are family firms really superior performers?Journal of Corporate Finance13(5): 829–858.
103.
MillerD.Le Breton‐MillerI.ScholnickB. (2008) Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non‐family businesses. Journal of Management Studies45(1): 51–78.
104.
MillerD.LeeJ.ChangS.LeBreton-MillerI. (2009) Filling the institutional void: The social behavior and performance of family vs non-family technology firms in emerging markets. Journal of International Business Studies40(5): 802–817.
105.
MillerD.MinichilliA.CorbettaG. (2013) Is family leadership always beneficial?Strategic Management Journal34(5): 553–571.
106.
MillerD.SteierL.Breton‐MillerL. (2016) What can scholars of entrepreneurship learn from sound family businesses?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice40(3): 445–455.
107.
MorettiE. (2004) Human capital externalities in cities. In: HendersonJ. V.ThisseJ. F. (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economicsVol. 4, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 2243–2291.
108.
NilssonP. (2015) The influence of urban and natural amenities on second home prices. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment30(3): 427–450.
109.
NonakaI. (2008) The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review Press69: 96–104.
110.
NortonR. D. (1992) Agglomeration and competitiveness: From Marshall to Chinitz. Urban Studies29(2): 155–170.
111.
O’BrienR. M. (2007) A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity41: 673–690.
112.
PeakeW. O.CooperD.FitzgeraldM. A.MuskeG. (2017) Family business participation in community social responsibility: The moderating effect of gender. Journal of Business Ethics142(2): 1–19.
113.
PearsonA. W.MarlerL. E. (2010) A leadership perspective of reciprocal stewardship in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice34(6): 1117–1124.
114.
PengM. W.LeeS. H.WangD. Y. (2005) What determines the scope of the firm over time? A focus on institutional relatedness. Academy of Management Review30(3): 622–633.
115.
PenningsJ. M.LeeK.WitteloostuijnA. V. (1998) Human capital, social capital, and firm dissolution. Academy of Management Journal41(4): 425–440.
116.
PittinoD.VisintinF.LengerT.SternadD. (2016) Are high performance work practices really necessary in family SMEs? An analysis of the impact on employee retention. Journal of Family Business Strategy7(2): 75–89.
117.
RaspeO.OortF. V. (2008) Firm growth and localized knowledge externalities. The Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy38(2): 100–116.
118.
SciasciaS.MazzolaP.ChiricoF. (2013) Generational involvement in the top management team of family firms: Exploring nonlinear effects on entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice37(1): 69–85.
119.
ShepherdD.WiklundJ. (2009) Are we comparing apples with apples or apples with oranges? Appropriateness of knowledge accumulation across growth studies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice33(1): 105–123.
120.
SirmonD. G.HittM. A. (2003) Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice27(4): 339–358.
121.
SmithC. W.WarnerJ. B. (1979) On financial contracting: An analysis of bond covenants. Journal of Financial Economics7: 117–161.
122.
Spender, J. C. (1993, August). Competitive advantage from tacit knowledge? Unpacking the concept and its strategic implications. Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 1993, No. 1, pp. 37–41). Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management.
123.
SteierL. (2001) Next-generation entrepreneurs and succession: An exploratory study of modes and means of managing social capital. Family Business Review14(3): 259–276.
124.
StoughR.WelterF.BlockJ.WennbergK.BascoR. (2015) Family business and regional science: “Bridging the gap. Journal of Family Business Strategy6(4): 208–218.
125.
SummersG. F. (1986) Rural community development. Annual Review of Sociology12(1): 347–371.
126.
TerzaJ. V.BasuA.RathouzP. J. (2008) Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: Addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling. Journal of Health Economics27(3): 531–543.
127.
ThompsonW. R. (1965) A preface to urban economics, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
128.
TunbergM. (2014) Approaching rural firm growth: A literature review. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy8(4): 261–286.
129.
UzziB. (1999) Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. American Sociological Review64(4): 481–505.
130.
WagnerD.BlockJ. H.MillerD.SchwensC.XiG. (2015) A meta-analysis of the financial performance of family firms: Another attempt. Journal of Family Business Strategy6(1): 3–13.
131.
WalesW. J.ParidaV.PatelP. C. (2013) Too much of a good thing? Absorptive capacity, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management Journal34(5): 622–633.
132.
WattsH. D.WoodA. M.WardleP. (2006) Owner-managers, clusters and local embeddedness: Small firms in the Sheffield (UK) metal-working cluster. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development18(3): 185–205.
133.
WelterF. (2011) Contextualizing entrepreneurship—conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice35(1): 165–184.
134.
WennbergK.LindqvistG. (2010) The effect of clusters on the survival and performance of new firms. Small Business Economics34(3): 221–241.
135.
WennbergK.WiklundJ.HellerstedtK.NordqvistM. (2011) Implications of intra‐family and external ownership transfer of family firms: Short‐term and long‐term performance differences. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal5(4): 352–372.
136.
WestlundH.LarssonJ. P.OlssonA. R. (2014) Start-ups and local entrepreneurial social capital in the municipalities of Sweden. Regional Studies48(6): 974–994.
137.
Wiklund, J. (1998). Small firm growth and performance: Entrepreneurship and beyond (Doctoral dissertation). Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping.
138.
WiklundJ.DavidssonP.DelmarF. (2003) What do they think and feel about growth? An expectancy‐value approach to small business managers’ attitudes toward growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice27(3): 247–270.
139.
WiklundJ.NordqvistM.HellerstedtK.BirdM. (2013) Internal versus external ownership transition in family firms: An embeddedness perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice37(6): 1319–1340.
140.
WiklundJ.PatzeltH.ShepherdD. A. (2009) Building an integrative model of small business growth. Small Business Economics32(4): 351–374.
141.
WooldridgeJ. (2012) Introductory econometrics: A modern approach, Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
142.
Zahra, S. A. (2005). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family business review, 18(1), 23–40.
143.
ZahraS. A.HaytonJ. C.SalvatoC. (2004) Entrepreneurship in family vs. non‐family firms: A resource‐based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice28(4): 363–381.
144.
ZahraS. A. (2010) Harvesting family firms’ organizational social capital: A relational perspective. Journal of Management Studies47(2): 345–366.
145.
ZellwegerT. M.NasonR. S.NordqvistM.BrushC. G. (2013) Why do family firms strive for nonfinancial goals? An organizational identity perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice37(2): 229–248.
