This paper strengthens the basis for a key claim of contemporary economic sociology — that strong ties among capitalists cannot be reduced to rational considerations. Support for this claim has been limited by reliance on an external standard of rationality, whereby irrationality in commitment to a partner or network is based on an observer’s evaluation of an actor’s interests. In this article we address this limitation by developing an internal standard for assessing the rationality of an actor’s commitment, which is derived from Davidson’s (1980) definition of akrasia or ‘incontinence.’ In addition, we clarify the mechanisms that produce ‘akratic’ commitment among capitalists: (a) short-term emotions that overwhelm rational calculation; and (b) a sense of loyalty that leads one to incorporate others’ interests into one’s own. Finally, we provide systematic evidence of akratic commitment and the proposed mechanisms from studies of an industry peer network in the remodeling construction industry.
Arkes HR and Blumer C. ( 1985) The psychology of sunk costs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes35: 124-140.
2.
Aristotle (2000) Nicomachean Ethics. Translated and edited by Roger Crisp.New York: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Bach R. and Smith J. ( 1977) Community satisfaction, expectations of moving, and migration . Demography14: 147-167.
4.
Baker G., Gibbons R., and Murphy KJ ( 2002) Relational contracts and the theory of the firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics117(1): 39-84.
5.
Baker WE ( 1984) The social structure of a national securities market. American Journal of Sociology89: 775-811.
6.
Becker HS ( 1961) Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology66: 32-40.
7.
Brockner J. ( 1992) The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: Toward theoretical progress. Academy of Management Review17: 39-61.
8.
Davidson D. ( 1980) Essays on Actions and Events. New York : Oxford University Press.
9.
Davidson D. ( 1985) Deception and division. In Elster J (ed.), The Multiple Self. New York: Cambridge University Press: 79-92.
10.
DiMaggio P. and Louch H. ( 1998) Socially embedded consumer transactions: For what kinds of purchases do people most often use networks? American Sociological Review63: 619-637.
11.
Granovetter M. ( 1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness . American Journal of Sociology91: 481-510.
12.
Granovetter (1995) Business groups. In Smelser NJ and Swedberg R (eds), Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: 453-465.
13.
Greif A. ( 1993) Contract enforceability and economic institutions in early trade: The Maghribi Traders’ Coalition. American Economic Review83: 525-548.
14.
Gulati R. and Gargiulo M. ( 1999) Where do interorganizational forms come from? American Journal of Sociology104: 1439-1493.
15.
Hochschild AR ( 1979) Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology85: 551-575.
16.
Hollis M. ( 1987) The Cunning of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Ingram P. and Roberts PW ( 2000) Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry . American Journal of Sociology106: 387-423.
18.
Kalberg S. ( 1980) Max Weber’s types of rationality: Cornerstones for the analysis of rationalization processes in history. American Journal of Sociology85: 1145-1179.
19.
Kollock P. ( 1994) The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust. American Journal of Sociology100: 313-345.
20.
Kranton RE and Minehart DF ( 2001) A theory of buyer-seller networks. American Economic Review91: 485-508.
21.
Landale NS and Guest AM ( 1985) Constraints, satisfaction and residential mobility: Speare’s model reconsidered. Demography22: 199-222.
22.
Lawler EJ ( 2002) An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology107: 321-352.
23.
Levine DN ( 1981) Rationality and freedom; Weber and beyond. Sociological Inquiry51: 5-25.
24.
Lincoln JR, Gerlach ML, and Ahmadjian CL ( 1996) Keiretsu networks and corporate performance in Japan. American Sociological Review1996: 67-88.
25.
Mele AR ( 1987) Irrationality: An Essay on Akrasia, Self-Deception, and Self-Control. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
Michelson W. ( 1977) Environmental Choice, Human Behavior and Residential Satisfaction . New York: Oxford University Press .
27.
O’Donoghue T. and Rabin M. ( 2005) Incentives and self-control. Working Paper, Department of Economics, Cornell University.
28.
Pears D. ( 1985) The goals and strategies of self-deception. In Elster J (ed.), The Multiple Self. New York: Cambridge University Press: 59-78.
29.
Powell WW, Koput K., and Smith-Doerr L. ( 1996) Inter-organizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly41: 116-145.
30.
Rauch JE ( 2001) Business and social networks in international trade. Journal of Economic Literature39: 1177-1203.
31.
Rorty AO ( 1985) Self-deception, akrasia and irrationality. In Elster J (ed.), The Multiple Self. New York: Cambridge University Press: 115-132.
32.
Schelling TC ( 1963) The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
33.
Sedaka N. and Greenfield H. ( 1962) Breaking up is hard to do. New York : RCA Records.
34.
Sen A. ( 1979[1977]) Rational fools: A critique of the behavioural foundations of economic theory. In Hahn F and Hollis M (eds), Philosophy and Economic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 87-109.
35.
Sen A. ( 1993) Internal Consistency of Choice. Econometrica61: 495-521.
36.
Shafir E. and LeBoeuf RA ( 2002) Rationality. Annual Review of Psychology53: 491-517.
37.
Simmel G. ( 1950) The sociology of Georg Simmel. ed. by Kurt H. Wolff.Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
38.
Simon HA ( 1979[1976]) From substantive to procedural rationality . In Hahn F and Hollis M (eds), Philosophy and Economic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 65-86.
39.
Sorenson O. and Waguespack D. ( 2006) Social structure and exchange: Self-confirming dynamics in Hollywood. Administrative Science Quarterly51: 560-589
40.
Speare A. Jr ( 1974) Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility. Demography11: 173-188.
41.
Strotz RH(1955-56) Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Review of Economic Studies23: 165-80.
42.
Uzzi B. ( 1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review61: 674-698.
43.
Uzzi B. ( 1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly42: 35-67.
44.
Uzzi B. ( 1999) Social relations and networks in the making of financial capital: How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing . American Sociological Review64: 481-505.
45.
Warren ME ( 1990) Ideology and the Self. Theory and Society19: 599-634.
46.
Yamaguchi K. ( 1991) Event History Analysis. New York: Sage Publications.
47.
Zuckerman EW and Sgourev S. ( 2006) Peer capitalism: The role of parallel relationships in the market economy. American Journal of Sociology111: 1327-1366.
