Social workers often report challenges associated with trying to maintain structural social work (SSW) amid conventional settings. Although there is some literature on practical applications of SSW, the literature is outdated. Consequently, this research was inspired by, and derived from, Bachelor of Social Work students who consistently sought practical wisdom and stories to gain insight into how to successfully maintain and practice SSW in modern conventional settings. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 28 structural social workers. Five key themes were identified regarding how one might successfully embody SSW: (a) adopting a strategic approach; (b) gaining credibility and competency; (c) building relationships and rapport; (d) navigating risk, and (e) recognizing barriers and being inventive. The findings are explored, implications for practice and knowledge dissemination discussed, and future research considered.
Aart ScholteJ. (2010). Governing a more global world. Corporate Governance: International Journal of Business in Society, 10(4), 459–474. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701011069687
2.
AggerB. (2006). Critical social theories: An introduction (2nd ed.). Paradigm Publishers.
3.
BarnoffL.GeorgeP.ColemanB. (2006). Operating in survival mode: Challenges to implementing anti-oppressive practice in feminist social service agencies in Toronto. Canadian Social Work Review/Revue Canadienne de Service Social, 23(1/2), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190076757.003.0008
4.
BellingerA.ElliottT. (2011). What are you looking at? The potential of appreciative inquiry as a research approach for social work. The British Journal of Social Work, 41(4), 708–725. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr065
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2019). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
7.
CaplanM. A.PurserG.KindleP. A. (2017). Personal accounts of poverty: A thematic analysis of social media. Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 14(6), 433–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2017.1380547
8.
CarniolB. (1992). Structural social work: Maurice Moreau’s challenge to social work practice. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 3(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1300/J059v03n01_01
ClarkS. L.Julien-ChinnF.JonesA.JenS.Dowdy-HazlettT.HuntM. K. (2023). “Without compassion we don’t have a social work field”: A thematic analysis exploring social workers’ experiences with compassion. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 20(6), 954–980. https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2023.2232799
11.
CooperA.LevinB. (2010). Some Canadian contributions to understanding knowledge mobilisation. Evidence and Policy, 6(3), 351–369. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426410X524839
12.
CooperriderD. L.WhitneyD. K. (2005). Appreciative inquiry: A positive revolution in change (1st ed.). Berrett-Koehler.
13.
D’CruzH.GillinghamP.MelendezS. (2007). Reflexivity, its meanings and relevance for social work: A critical review of the literature. British Journal of Social Work, 37(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl001
14.
DumbrillG. C.YeeJ. Y. (2019). Anti-oppressive social work: Ways of knowing, talking, and doing. Oxford University Press.
15.
FergusonH. (2018). How social workers reflect in action and when and why they don’t: The possibilities and limits to reflective practice in social work. Social Work Education, 37(4), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2017.1413083
16.
FoucaultM. (2002). The archaeology of knowledge. Routledge.
GrayM.SharlandE.HeinschM.SchubertL. (2015). Connecting research to action: Perspectives on research utilisation. British Journal of Social Work, 45(7), 1952–1967. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu089
20.
GreasonM.JardineA.MuiseA. (2024). Better equipping structural social workers: Embodying social justice values in practice. Professional Development: The International Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 27(1), 3–16.
21.
HickS.PetersH. I.CornerT.LondonT. (2009). Structural social work in action: Examples from practice. Canadian Scholars.
22.
HickS.StokesJ. (2021). Social welfare in Canada: Inclusion, equity, and social justice (4th ed.). Thompson Educational.
23.
HungL.PhinneyA.ChaudhuryH. (2018). Appreciative inquiry: Bridging research and practice in a hospital setting. Innovation in Aging, 2(Suppl. 1), 142. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igy023.517
24.
KimballE.PendellK. (2022). Social Work Scholars Perceptions of Practice-Informed Research and Research Informed Practice. Journal of Social Service Research, 48(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2021.1953676
25.
KincheloeJ. L.McLarenP. (2005). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. E. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, third edition (pp. 303–342). Sage.
26.
LabraO.CastroC.WrightR.ChamblasI. (2019). Thematic analysis in social work: A case study. In Global social work: Cutting edge issues and critical reflections. Intechopen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89464
27.
LundyC. (2011). Social work, social justice, and human rights: A structural approach to practice (2nd ed.). University of Toronto Press.
28.
MoreauM. (1979). A structural approach to social work practice. Canadian Journal of Social Work Education / Revue Canadienne D’éducation en Service Social, 5(1), 78–94. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41670012
29.
MoreauM. [In collaboration with LeonardL.]. (1989). Empowerment through a structural approach to social work: A report from practice. Ecole de Service Social & Carleton University, School of Social Work.
30.
MoreauM. J. (1990). Empowerment through advocacy and consciousness-raising: Implications of a structural approach to social work. The Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 17(2), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.15453/0191-5096.1939
31.
MullalyB.DupréM. (2018). The new structural social work (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
32.
MullalyR. P.WestJ. (2018). Challenging oppression and confronting privilege a critical social work approach to anti-oppressive and anti-privilege theory and practice. Oxford University Press.
33.
NicholsL. C.CooperL. B. (2011). Individualism and its discontents in social work: Proposing a counternarrative for a new vision of social work theory and practice. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 22(1), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428232.2011.565508
34.
NutleyS.WalterI.DaviesH. T. O. (2003). From knowing to doing: A framework for understanding the evidence-into-practice agenda. Evaluation, 9(2), 125–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389003009002002
35.
O’ConnorL. (2020). How social workers understand and use their emotions in practice: A thematic synthesis literature review. Qualitative Social Work, 19(4), 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325019843991
36.
PetersH. I. (2012). Exploring the spaces between theory and practice: A framework to integrate a structural approach and social work activities [Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia]. Open Collections: The University of British Columbia. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0072727
37.
PhillipowskyD. J. (2020). Perspectives on social workers from within an integrated setting. Journal of Integrated Care, 28(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICA-11-2019-0049
38.
SenR.KerrC.MacIntyreG.FeatherstoneB.GuptaA.Quinn-AzizA. (2022). Social work under COVID-19: A thematic analysis of articles in “SW2020 under COVID-19 magazine.”The British Journal of Social Work, 52(3), 1765–1782. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab094
39.
SpencerE.MassingD.GoughJ. (2017). Social work ethics: Progressive, practical, and relational approaches. Oxford University Press.
TeaterB.CarpenterJ. (2017). Independent social work practices with adults in England: An appreciative inquiry of a pilot programme. Journal of Social Work, 17(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017316637229
42.
WeekesA. P. (2023). Being intentional about intersectionality and positionality. Social Work Education. Advance online publication, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2023.2273259
WeinbergM. (2017). New tools for ethical practice in an era of fiscal restraint. In SpencerE.MassingD.GoughJ. (Eds.), Social work ethics: Progressive, practical, and relational approaches (pp. 69–83). Oxford.
45.
WhiteS. (2001). Auto-ethnography as reflexive enquiry: The research act as self-surveillance. In ShawI.GouldN. (Eds.), Qualitative research in social work (pp. 100–115). Sage.
