This qualitative study examines student learning experiences toward a student-developed case study activity for online discussion guided by a three-tier case method model. Forty-five students were recruited from four online adult education courses. Analysis of students’ feedback shows that this activity leads to students’ positive learning experiences, including provoking critical thinking towards the discussion topic and providing unique resources for adult educators. The student-developed case study activity also helps establish a supportive peer relationship and engages students through analyzing a variety of student-developed cases, as well as interacting with the instructor and exchanging ideas with peers. This study furthermore indicates the potential usefulness of the proposed model as a guide for case study activities in the field of adult education and beyond.
Abdal-HaqqI. (1998). Constructivism in teacher education: Considerations for those who would link practice to theory. ERIC Digest.
2.
AkbulutM. S.HillJ. R. (2020). Case-based pedagogy for teacher education: An instructional model. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), ep287. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8937
3.
AlaniF. (2020). Development of case-based learning (CBL) in engineering technology education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 36(3), 896–900.
4.
AllenD. D.Toth-CohenS. (2019). Use of case studies to promote critical thinking in occupational therapy students. Journal of Occupational Therapy Education, 3(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2019.030309
5.
ArghodeV.WangJ.LathanA. (2017). Exploring instructors’ practices in student engagement: A collective case study. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 17(4), 126–149. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v17i4.22099
BrookfieldS. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. Jossey-Bass.
8.
BrookfieldS. D. (2006). The skillful teacher: On technique, trust, and responsiveness in the classroom (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
9.
BrookfieldS. D. (2015). The skillful teacher: On technique, trust, and responsiveness in the classroom (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
10.
BrooksJ. G.BrooksM. G. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
11.
DeweyJ. (1916). Democracy and education. McMillan.
12.
HartfieldP. J. (2010). Reinforcing constructivist teaching in advanced level biochemistry through the introduction of case-based learning activities. Journal of Learning Design, 3(3), 20–31.
13.
HerreidC. F. (Ed), (2007). Start with a story: The case study method of teaching college science. NSTA press.
14.
HerreidC. F. (2011). Case study teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2011(128), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.466
15.
JohnsonS. D.ThomasR. G. (1994). Implications of cognitive science for instructional design in technology education. Journal of Technology Studies, 20(1), 33–45.
16.
KnowlesM. S. (1984). Andragogy in Action. Applying Modern Principles of Adult Education. Jossey Bass.
17.
KtoridouD.DoukanariE.EpaminondaE.KarayiannisA. (2018, April 17-20). Case-based learning: Offering a premier targeted learning experience for technology management students. In: IEEE global engineering education conference (EDUCON), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain. pp. 1781–1786.
LyonsP.BanduraR. P. (2020). Stimulating employee learning: The confluence of case-based and self-regulated learning. Industrial and Commercial Training, 52(3), 171–183. http://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-12-2019-0109
20.
MesthrigeJ. W.LamP. T.ChiangY. H.SamarasinghalageT. I. (2021). Effectiveness of case-based learning: Views of construction and real estate students. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 17(4), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2020.1758254
21.
PopilI. (2011). Promotion of critical thinking by using case studies as teaching method. Nurse Education Today, 31(2), 204–207. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.06.002
22.
QueirósA.FariaD.AlmeidaF. (2017). Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(9), 369–387. http://doi/org/10.5281/zenodo.887089
23.
RazaS. A.QaziW.UmerB. (2020). Examining the impact of case-based learning on student engagement, learning motivation and learning performance among university students. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(3), 517–533. http://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-05-2019-0105
24.
RoshniM.RahimA. (2020). Small group discussions as an effective teaching-learning methodology for learning the principles of family medicine among 2nd-year MBBS students. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 9(5), 2248. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1228_19
25.
Ross-GordonJ. M.RoseA. D.KaswormC. E. (2016). Foundations of adult and continuing education. John Wiley & Sons.
26.
SaveryJ. R.DuffyT. M. (1996). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. In WilsonB. G. (Ed), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 31–38). Educational Technology.
27.
SchunkD. H. (2008). Learning theories: An educational perspective (5th ed.). Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
28.
ThornbergR.CharmazK. (2014). Grounded theory and theoretical coding. In FlickU. (Ed), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 153–169). Sage.
29.
TrespalaciosJ. (2017). Exploring small group analysis of instructional design cases in online learning environments. Online Learning, 21(1), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i1.928
30.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
31.
YadavA.LundebergM.DeSchryverM.DirkinK.SchillerN. A.MaierK.HerreidC. F. (2007). Teaching science with case studies: A national survey of faculty perceptions of the benefits and challenges of using cases. Journal of College Science Teaching, 37(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst14_044_01_75
32.
YinR. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (applied social research methods). Sage.
