This study examined the moderating role of team task autonomy on the relationship between the mean level of three personality traits in a team—conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness to experience—and two individual outcomes—job satisfaction and learning. Questionnaire data were collected from 133 task groups of undergraduate business students. Multilevel analyses showed that team task autonomy strengthens the relationship between conscientiousness and learning and the relationship between openness to experience and satisfaction. We conclude that team attributes, characteristics of the individual member, and team task autonomy as a moderator variable explain differences in individual outcomes and help in predicting the effectiveness of teamwork.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Barrick, M. R.,& Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.
3.
Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J.,& Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377-391.
4.
Barry, B., & Stewart, G. L. (1997). Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: the role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 62-78.
5.
Beyerlein, M. M., Johnson, D. A., & Beyerlein, S. T. (Eds.). (1997). Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work team. London: JAI.
6.
Bowen, J., Qiu, Z.,& Li, Y. (1994). Robust tolerance for ambiguity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 155-165.
7.
Breaugh, J. A. (1985). The measurement ofwork autonomy. Human Relations, 38, 551-570.
8.
Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J.,& Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations betweenwork group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823-850.
9.
Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M.,& Medsker, G. J. (1996). Relations betweenwork team characteristics and effectiveness: a replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49, 429-452.
10.
Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: Atypology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246.
11.
Cohen, S. G.,& Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teamswork? Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suit. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
12.
Cohen, S. G., Ledford, G. E.,& Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Apredictive model of self-managing work team effectiveness. Human Relations, 49, 643-676.
13.
Cordery, J. L. (1996). Autonomouswork groups and quality circles. In West, M. (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology. Chichester, England: John Wiley.
14.
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
15.
Driskell, J. E., Hogan, R.,& Salas, E. (1988). Personality and group performance. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 91-112.
16.
Dunphy, D., & Bryant, B. (1996). Teams: Panaceas or prescriptions for improved performance?Human Relations, 49, 677-699.
17.
Evans, B. K., & Fischer, D. G. (1992). A hierarchical model of participatory decision-making, job autonomy, and perceived control. Human Relations, 45, 1169-1189.
18.
Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34.
19.
Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design ofwork teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbookof organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20.
Hendriks, A. A. (1997). The construction of the Five-Factor Personality Inventory (FFPI). Dissertation, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
21.
Heslin, R. (1964). Predicting group task effectiveness from member characteristics. Psychological Bulletin, 62, 248-256.
22.
Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
Hox, J. J., & Kreft, I. G. G. (1994). Multilevel analysis methods. Sociological Methods & Research, 22, 283-299.
24.
Jackson, S. E. (1996). The consequences of diversity in multidisciplinarywork teams. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of Work Group Psychology. New York: John Wiley.
25.
Jehn, K. A. (1997). Affective and cognitive conflict in work groups: Increasing performance through value-based intragroup conflict. In C. de Dreu& E. Van der Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations. London: Sage.
26.
Klein, K. J.,& Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 211-236.
27.
Langfred, C. W. (2000). Work-group design and autonomy: A field study of the interaction between task interdependence and group autonomy. Small Group Research, 31, 54-70.
28.
Latané, B., Williams, K.,& Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make lightwork: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-832.
29.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J.,& Bradway, L. K. (1997). Task interdependence as a moderator of the relation between group control and performance. Human Relations, 50, 169-181.
30.
Manz, C. C. (1992). Self-leading work teams: Moving beyond self-management myths. Human Relations, 45, 1119-1140.
31.
Manz, C. C.,& Sims, H. P. (1987). Leadingworkers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 106-128.
32.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggin’s circumplex and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 586-595.
33.
McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
34.
Mohrman, S. A., Cohen, S. G.,& Mohrman, A. M. (1995). Designing team-based organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35.
Molleman, E. (2000). The modalities of self-management: The “must,” “may,” “can” and “will” of local decision making. The International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20, 889-910.
36.
Molleman, E., & Broekhuis, M. (2001). Socio-Technical Systems: Towards an organizational learning approach. The Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 18, 271-293.
37.
Molleman, E., & Slomp, J. (1999). Functional flexibility and team performance. International Journal of Production Research, 37, 1837-1858.
38.
Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. (1995). The Big Five personality dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resources management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13, 153-200.
39.
Neuman, G. A., Wagner, S. H., & Christiansen, N. D. (1999). The relationship between work-team personality composition and the job performance of teams. Group& Organization Management, 24, 28-45.
40.
Niepce, W., & Molleman, E. (1998). Work design issues in lean production from a sociotechnical systems perspective: Neo-Taylorism or the next step in sociotechnical design. Human Relations, 51, 259-287.
41.
O’Reilly, C. A., Caldwell, D. F., & Barnett, W. P. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 21-37.
42.
Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D.,& Cordery, J. L. (2001). Futurework design research and practice: Towards an elaborated model of work design. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 413-440.
43.
Pelled, L. H. (1996). Relational demography and perceptions of group conflict and performance: Afield investigation. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 7, 230-246.
44.
Saavedra, R., Earley, P. C., & Van Dyne, L. (1993). Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 61-72.
45.
Shea, G. P., & Guzzo, R. A. (1987). Groups as human resources. In K. M. Rowland & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management(Vol. 5, pp. 323-356). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
46.
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel-analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
47.
Sprigg, C. A., Jackson, P. R., & Parker, S. K. (2000). Production teamworking: The importance of interdependence and autonomy for employee strain and satisfaction. Human Relations, 53, 1519-1543.
48.
Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
49.
Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 135-148.
50.
Thoms, P., Moore, K. S., & Scott, K. S. (1996). The relationship between self-efficacy for participating in self-managed work groups and the Big Five personality dimensions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 349-362.
51.
Tschan, F., & Von Cranach, M. (1996). Group task structure, processes and outcome. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology. New York: John Wiley.
52.
Van der Vegt, G., Emans, B.,& Van de Vliert, E. (2000). Team members’affective responses to patterns of intragroup interdependence and job complexity. Journal of Management, 26, 633-655.
53.
Van Vianen, A. E. M., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2001). Personality in teams: Its relationship to social cohesion, task cohesion, and team performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 97-120.
54.
Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145-180.
55.
Wageman, R. (Ed.). (1999). Research on managing groups and teams. Stamford, CT: JAI.
56.
Weaver, J. L., Bowers, C. A., Sales, E.,& Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1997). Motivation in teams. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson,& S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
57.
West, M. A. (Ed.). (1996). Handbook of work group psychology. New York: John Wiley.
58.
West, M. A., Borill, C. S., & Unsworth, K. L. (1998). Team effectiveness in organizations. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 13, 1-48.
59.
Wilke, H. A. M., & Meertens, R. W. (1994). Group performance. London: Routledge.
60.
Wood, R. E. (1986). Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 60-82.
61.
Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26, 179-201.
62.
Yeatts, D. A., & Hyten, C. (1998). High-performing self-managed work teams: A comparison of theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
