This study examined perceptions of turning points and six dialectical contradictions for organizational team development. Sixty-three team members were interviewed utilizing a revised version of the Retrospective Interview Technique (RIT). After turning points were identified, a questionnaire was administered to determine the centrality or importance of six dialectical contradictions for each turning point. The six contradictions were autonomy versus connection, predictability versus novelty, openness versus closedness, team versus individual, dominance versus submission, and competence versus incompetence. Turning point types clustered around issues of cohesion, project development, socialization, member change, competence, workload, and conflict. Questionnaire results revealed that team versus individual and competence versus incompetence were rated as significantly more important and dominance versus submission was significantly less important than the other three contradictions.
Alper, S., Tjosvold, D., & Law, K. S. (1998). Interdependence and controversy in group decision making: Antecedents to effective self-managing teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 33-52.
2.
Alper, S., Tjosvold, D., & Law, K. S. (2000). Conflict management: Efficacy and performance in organizational teams. Personnel Psychology, 53, 625-643.
3.
Altman, I. (1993). Dialectics, physical environments, and personal relationships. Communication Monographs, 60, 26-41.
4.
Altman, I., Vinsel, A., & Brown, B. B. (1981). Dialectic conceptions in social psychology: An application to social penetration and privacy regulation. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 107-160). New York: Academic Press.
5.
Applegate, L. M. (1999). In search of a new organizational model: Lessons from the field. In G. DeSanctis& J. Fulk (Eds.), Shaping organizational form (pp. 33-70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7.
Bales, R. F. (1953). The equilibrium problem in small groups. In T. Parsons, R. F. Bales, & E. Shils (Eds.), Working papers in the theory of action (pp. 111-161). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
8.
Barge, J. K. (1994). Leadership: Communication skills for organizations and groups. New York: St. Martin’s.
9.
Barker, J. R. (1999). The discipline of teamwork. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Barker, J. R., Melville, C. W., & Pacanowsky, M. E. (1993). Self-directed teams at Xel: Changes in communication practices during a program of cultural transformation. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 21, 297-312.
11.
Baxter, L. A. (1990). Dialectic contradictions in relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 69-88.
12.
Baxter, L. A., Braithwaite, D. O., & Nicholson, J. (1997, November). Turning points in the development of blended families. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
13.
Baxter, L. A., & Erbert, L. A. (1999). Perceptions of dialectical contradictions in turning points of development in heterosexual romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 547-569.
14.
Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York: Guilford.
15.
Benson, J. K. (1977). Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 1-21.
16.
Bolton, C. D. (1961). Mate selection as the development of a relationship. Marriage and Family Living, 23, 234-240.
17.
Bullis, C., & Bach, B. W. (1989). Socialization turning points: An examination of change in organizational identification. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53, 273-293.
18.
Carpenter, M. A. (2001). Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 533-545.
19.
Conville, R. L. (1983). Second-order development in interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 9, 195-207.
20.
Conville, R. L. (1988). Relational transitions: An inquiry into their structure and function. Journal Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 423-437.
21.
Conville, R. L. (1991). Relational transitions: The evolution of personal relationships. New York: Praeger.
Doolen, T. L., Hacker, M. E., & Van Aken, E. M. (2003). The impact of organizational context on work team effectiveness: A study of production team. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50, 285-297.
24.
Druskat, V. U., & Wheeler, J. V. (2003). Managing from the boundary: The effective leadership of self-managing work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 435-457.
25.
Eisenberg, E. M., & Goodall, H. L. (2004). Organizational communication (4th ed.). New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
26.
Erbert, L. A. (2000). Conflict and dialectics: Perceptions of dialectical contradictions in marital conflict. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 638-659.
27.
Erbert, L. A. (2002, November). Perceptions of dialectical contradictions in organizational conflict. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
28.
Erbert, L. A., & Duck, S. W. (1996). “Rethinking” satisfaction in personal relationships from a dialectical perspective. In R. J. Sternberg& M. Hojjat (Eds.), Satisfaction in close relationships (pp. 191-216). New York: Guilford.
29.
Erbert, L. A., Pérez, F. G., & Gareis, E. (2003). Turning points and dialectical interpretations of immigrant experiences in the United States. Western Journal of Communication, 67, 113-137.
30.
Farrell, M. P., Schmitt, M. H., & Heinemann, G. D. (2001). Informal roles and the stages of interdisciplinary team development. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 15, 281-295.
31.
Fisher, B. A., & Stutman, R. K. (1987). An assessment of group trajectories: Analyzing developmental breakpoints. Communication Quarterly, 35, 105-124.
32.
Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. W. (1994). Logics of identity, contradiction, and attraction in change. Academy of Management Review, 19, 756-785.
33.
Gersick, C. J. (1988). Time and transitions in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.
34.
Gersick, C. J. (1989). Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 274-309.
35.
Gersick, C. J. (1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 10-36.
36.
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
37.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
38.
Goldsmith, D. (1990). A dialectical perspective on the expression of autonomy and connection in romantic relationships. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 54, 537-556.
39.
Gouran, D. S. (1982). Making decisions in groups. Propsect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
40.
Gouran, D. S., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (1996). Functional theory and communication in decision-making and problem-solving groups: An expanded view. In R. Y. Hirokawa& M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (pp. 55-80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
Graham, E. E. (1997). Turning points and commitment in post-divorce relationships. Communication Monographs, 64, 350-368.
42.
Granovetter, M. S. (1976). Network sampling: Some first steps. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 1287-1303.
43.
Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1993). Management of organizational behavior (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
44.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1983). Group communication and problem-solving effectiveness II: An exploratory investigation of procedural functions. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 59-74.
45.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1988). Group communication and decision-making performance: A continued test of the functional perspective. Human Communication Research, 14, 487-515.
46.
Hirokawa, R. Y., & Poole, M. S. (Eds.). (1996). Communication and group decision making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
Holquist, M. (Ed.). (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
48.
Huston, T. L., Surra, C., Fitzgerald, N., & Cate, R. (1981). From courtship to marriage: Mate selection as an interpersonal process. In S. Duck& R. Gilmour (Eds.), The emerging field of personal relationships (pp. 53-88). New York: Academic Press.
49.
Kirkman, B. L. (2000). Why do employees resist teams? Examining the “resistance barrier” to work team effectiveness. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11, 74-93.
50.
Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2001). Organizational behavior (5th ed.). New York: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
51.
Larson, C. E., & LaFasto, F. M. (1989). Teamwork. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
52.
MacKenzie, K. D. (1976). A theory of group structures (Vols. 1-2). New York: Gordon & Breach.
53.
Marquardt, M. J., & Horvath, L. (2001). Global teams. Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black.
54.
McGrath, J. E., Arrow, H., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). The study of groups: part, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 95-105.
55.
Morris, P. (Ed.). (1994). The bakhtin reader. New York: Edward Harold.
56.
Neubert, M. J. (1999). Too much of a good thing or the more the merrier?Small Group Research, 30, 635-647.
57.
Parker, G. M. (1994). Cross-functional teams. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
58.
Parker, G. M. (2003). Cross-functional teams (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
59.
Poole, M. S., & Roth, J. (1989). Decision development in small groups IV: A typology of decision paths. Human Communication Research, 15, 323-356.
60.
Poole, M. S., Seibold, D. R., & McPhee, R. D. (1996). The structuration of group decisions. In R. Y. Hirokawa& M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (pp. 114-146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61.
Price Waterhouse Change Integration Team. (1996). The paradox principles: How high performance companies manage chaos, complexity, and contradiction to achieve superior results. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
62.
Putnam, L. L., & Stohl, C. (1990). Bona fide groups: A reconceptualization of groups in context. Communication Studies, 41, 248-265.
63.
Putnam, L. L., & Stohl, C. (1996). Bona fide groups: An alternative perspective for communication and small group decision making. In R. Y. Hirokawa& M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (pp. 147-178). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
Quinn, R. E.,& Cameron, K. S. (Eds.).(1988). Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
65.
Rawlins, W. K. (1989). A dialectical analysis of tensions, functions, and strategic challenges of communication in young adult friendships. Communication Yearbook, 12, 157-189.
66.
Rawlins, W. K. (1992). Friendship matters: Communication, dialectics, and the life course. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
67.
Sheehan, A. L., & Martin, R. (2003). Understanding diversity to maximize work team effectiveness: Field studies designed to unravel the complex relationship between diversity and team effectiveness. Australian Journal of Psychology, 55, 144-159.
68.
Smith, K. K., & Berg, D. N. (1987). Paradoxes of group life: Understanding conflict, paralysis, and movement in group dynamics. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
69.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
70.
Tretheway, A. (1999). Isn’t it ironic: Using irony to explore the contradictions of organizational life. Western Journal of Communication, 63, 140-168.
71.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
72.
VanLear, C. A. (1991). Testing a cyclical model of communicative openness in relationship development: Two longitudinal studies. Communication Monographs, 58, 337-361.
