This essay discusses interdisciplinary research in the context of science policy and the practice of science. Comparisons between interdisciplinary research and other forms of cross-disciplinary research are made, and a brief discussion of the development of the concept of interdisciplinarity is provided. The overarching thesis of this essay is that interdisciplinary research is team research, that is, research conducted by a team. This notion is developed via recent policy discussions of team science and the need to understand interdisciplinary research in action. The author shows how it may be possible to consider the implementation of principles from teamwork and team training to improve interdisciplinary research and the practice of team science.
Aboelela, S.W., Larson, E., Bakken, S., Carrasquillo, O., Formicola, A., Glied, S.A., et al. (2007). Defining interdisciplinary research: Conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health Services Research, 42, 329-346.
2.
Barthes, R. (1977). Image music text. London: Harper Collins.
3.
Bass, B.M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
4.
Bass, B.M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (Eds.). (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Blickensderfer, E.L., Cannon-Bowers, J.A., & Salas, E. (1997). Theoretical bases for team self-correction: Fostering shared mental models. In M. Beyerlein, D. Johnson, & S. Beyerlein (Eds), Advances in interdisciplinary studies in work teams series (Vol. 4, pp. 249-279). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
7.
Bowers, C. A., Jentsch, F., & Salas, E. ( 2000). Establishing aircrew competencies: A comprehensive approach for identifying CRM training needs. In H. F. O'Neil & D. Andrews (Eds.), Aircrew training and assessment (pp. 67-84). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Brozek, J., & Keys, A. (1944). General aspects of interdisciplinary research in experimental biology. Science, 100, 507-512.
9.
Burke, C.S., Fiore, S.M., & Salas, E. (2003). The role of shared cognition in enabling shared leadership and team adaptability (pp. 103-121). In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Burke, C., Stagl, K., Klein, C., Goodwin, G., Salas, E., & Halpin, S. (2006). What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 288-307.
11.
Cacioppo, J.T. (2007). Better interdisciplinary research through psychological science. Observer, 20(10), 3, 48-49.
12.
Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E., Blickensderfer, E., & Bowers, C.A. (1998). The impact of cross-training and workload on team functioning: A replication and extension. Human Factors, 40, 92-101.
13.
Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Tannenbaum, S.I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C.E. (1995). Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 333-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Carson, J.B., Tesluk, P.E., & Marrone, J.A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1217-1234.
15.
Conrad, D. (2006). Dream team science. Nano Science and Technology Institute. Retrieved August 20, 2007, from www.nsti.org/news/item.html?id=78
16.
Cooke, N.J., Kiekel, P.A., & Helm E. (2001). Measuring team knowledge during skill acquisition of a complex task. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics , 5, 297-315.
17.
Crandall, B., Klein, G., & Hoffman, R. (2005). Labors of mind: A practitioner's handbook of cognitive task analysis. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
18.
Crow, M.M., & Bozeman, B. (1998). Limited by design: R&D laboratories in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.
19.
D'Amour, D., Ferrada-Videla, M., San Martin Rodriguez, M., & Beaulieu, M.D. (2005). The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: Core concepts and theoretical frameworks . Journal of Interpersonal Care, 1, 116-131.
20.
Darden, L., & Maull, N. (1977). Interfield theories. Philosophy of Science, 44, 43-64.
21.
Davies, J.M. (2001). Medical applications of crew resource management . In E. Salas, C. A. Bowers, & E. Edens (Eds.), Improving teamwork in organizations: Applications of resource management training (pp. 265-281). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
Day, D., Zaccaro, S., & Halpin, S. (2004). Leader development for transforming organizations: Growing leaders for tomorrow. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
de Solla Price, D.J. (1986). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1963)
24.
Dingfelder, S.F. (2007). Team science. Monitor on Psychology , 38, 1. Retrieved January 15, 2008, from www.apa.org/monitor/jan07/team.html
25.
Dionne, S.D., Yammarino, F.J., Atwater, L.E., & Spangler, W.D. (2004). Transformational leadership and team performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management , 17, 177-193.
26.
Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg , & J. Davidson (Eds.), Mechanisms of insight (pp. 365-395). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
27.
Facilitating interdisciplinary research. (2004). National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine . Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
28.
Fiore, S.M., Johnston, J., & McDaniel, R. (2005). Applying the narrative form and XML metadata to debriefing simulation-based exercises. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 2135-2139). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society .
29.
Fiore, S.M., & Schooler, J.W. (2004). Process mapping and shared cognition: Teamwork and the development of shared problem models. In E. Salas & S.M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 133-152). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
30.
Gardner, H. (2000). The disciplined mind. New York : Penguin Books.
31.
Gorman, M.E., Kincannon, A., & Mehalik, M.M. (2001). Spherical sorses and shared toothbrushes: Lessons learned from a workshop on scientific and technological thinking. In K. P. Jantke & S. Shinohara (Eds.), Discovery science: 4th international conference (pp. 74-86). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
32.
Helmreich, R.L., & Foushee, H.C. (1993). Why crew resource management? Empirical and theoretical bases of human factors training in aviation. In E. Wiener, B. Kanki, & R. L. Helmreich (Eds.), Cockpit resource management (pp. 3-45). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
33.
Hohle, B.M., McInnis, J.K., & Gates, A.C. (1969). The public health nurse as a member of the interdisciplinary team. Nursing Clinics of North America, 4, 311-319.
34.
Hollenbeck, J.R., DeRue, D.S., & Guzzo, R. (2004). Bridging the gap between I/O research and HR practice: Improving team composition, team training and team task design. Human Resource Management, 43(4), 353-366.
35.
Jacobson, S.R. (1974). A study of interprofessional collaboration. Nursing Outlook, 22, 751-755.
36.
Klein, C., Salas, E., Burke, C.S., Goodwin, G.F., Halpin, S., DiazGranados, D., et al. (2006). Does team training enhance team processes, performance, and team member affective outcomes? A meta-analysis. In K. M. Weaver (Ed.), Best paper proceedings of the 66th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management , Atlanta, GA [CD-ROM]. Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management.
37.
Klein, G. (2000). Cognitive task analysis of teams. In J. M. Schraagen, S. F. Chipman , & V. L. Shalin, (Eds.) Cognitive task analysis (pp. 417-430). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38.
Klein, J.T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
39.
Kozlowski, S.W.J., Gully, S., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (1996). Team leadership and development: Theory, principles, and guidelines for training leaders and teams . In M. M. Beyerlein, D. Johnson, & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Interdisciplinary studies of work teams: Vol. 3. Team leadership (pp. 253-291). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
40.
Kozlowski, S.W.J., & Ilgen, D.R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77-124.
41.
Lavin, M.A., Ruebling, I., Banks, R., Block, L., Counte, M., Furman, G., et al. (2001). Interdisciplinary health professional education: A historical review. Advances in Health Sciences Education , 6, 25-37.
42.
Lidstrom, M. (2005). Team science. Retrieved October 10, 2007, from http://www.washington.edu/research/teamsci05.pdf
43.
Lupella, R.O. (1972). Postgraduate clinical training in speech pathology-audiology: Experiences in an interdisciplinary medical setting. American Speech-Language and Hearing Association, 14, 611-614.
44.
Lyons, P. (2006). Team member involvement in team leader training and performance. Team Performance Management, 12, 102-114.
45.
Marks, M.A., Sabella, M.J., Burke, C.S., & Zaccaro, S.J. (2002). The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness . Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 3-13.
46.
Nash, J., Collins, B., Loughlin, S., Solbrig, M., Harvey, R., Krishnan-Sarin, S., et al. (2003). Training the transdisciplinary scientist: A general framework applied to tobacco use behavior. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 5(Suppl. 1), S41-S53.
47.
Payne, V. (2001). The team-building workshop: A trainer's guide . New York: American Management Association.
48.
Pearce, C.L., & Sims, H.P. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational and empowering leader behaviors . Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 172-197.
49.
Pellmar, T. C., & Eisenberg, L. (Eds.). (2000). Bridging disciplines in the brain, behavioral, and clinical sciences. Washington DC: Institute of Medicine/National Academy Press.
50.
Porter, A.L., Roessner, J.D., Cohen, A.S., & Perreault, M. (2006). Interdisciplinary research: Meaning, metrics and nurture. Research Evaluation, 15(3), 187-195.
51.
Press, F. (1988). The dilemma of the golden age. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 13(3/4), 224-231.
52.
Saavedra, R., Earley, P.C., & Van Dyne, L. (1993). Complex interdependence in task-performing groups . Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 61-72.
53.
Salas, E., Bowers, C. A., & Edens, E. (Eds.). (2001). Improving teamwork in organizations: Applications of resource management training. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54.
Salas, E., Burke, C.S., & Stagl, K.C. (2004). Developing teams and team leaders: Strategies and principles. In D. Day, S. Zaccaro, & S. M. Halpin (Eds.), Leader development for transforming organizations: Growing Leaders for tomorrow (pp. 325-355). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55.
Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (1997). Methods, tools, and strategies for team training. In M. A. Quiñones & A. Ehrenstein (Eds.), Training for a rapidly changing workplace: Applications of psychological research (pp. 247-279). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
56.
Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (2000). The anatomy of team training. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Training & retraining: A handbook for business, industry, government, and the military (pp. 312-335). New York: Macmillan.
57.
Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471-499.
58.
Salas, E., Dickinson, T.L., Converse, S.A., & Tannenbaum, S.I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 3-29). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
59.
Salas, E., & Fiore, S. M. (Eds). (2004). Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
60.
Salas, E., Rosen, M.A., Burke, C.S., Goodwin, G.F., & Fiore, S.M. (2006). The making of a dream team: When expert teams do best. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich , & R. R. Hoffman, (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 439-456). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61.
Salas, E., Rozell, D., Mullen, B., & Driskell, J.E. (1999). The effect of team building on performance: An integration. Small Group Research, 30, 309-329.
62.
Salas, E., Sims, D.E., Klein, C., & Burke, C.S. (2003). Can teamwork enhance patient safety? Forum, 23, 5-9.
63.
Salas, E., Wilson, K.A., Burke, C.S., Wightman, D.C., & Howse, W.R. (2006). A checklist for crew resource management training . Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications , 14, 2.
64.
Smith-Jentsch, K.A., Zeisig, R.L., Acton, B., & McPherson, J.A. (1998). Team dimensional training: A strategy for guided team self-correction. In J. A. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 271-297). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
65.
Stagl, K.C., Salas, E., & Fiore, S.M. (2007). Best practices in cross training teams. In D. A. Nembhard (Ed.), Workforce cross training handbook (pp. 155-179). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
66.
Stein, Z. (2007). Modeling the demands of interdisciplinarity: Toward a framework for evaluating interdisciplinary endeavors. Integral Review, 4, 91-107.
67.
Stewart, G.L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management , 32, 29-55.
68.
Stokols, D., Taylor, B., Hall, K., & Moser, R. (2006, October). The science of team science: An overview of the field. Paper presented at the National Cancer Institute conference on the Science of Team Evaluation, Bethesda, MD. Presentation slides retrieved December 10, 2007, from http://dccps.nci.nih.gov/BRP/scienceteam/Team_Science_Overview_Stokols_etal.pdf .
69.
Sundstrom, E., DeMeuse, K.P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120-133.
70.
Swezey, R., & Salas, E. (Eds.). (1992). Teams: Their training and performance. Norwood, NJ: Ablex .
71.
Tannenbaum, S.I., Smith-Jentsch, K.A., & Behson, S.J. (1998). Training team leaders to facilitate team learning and performance. In J. A. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 247-270). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
72.
Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding: Vol. 1. The collective use and development of concepts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
73.
Volpe, C.E., Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E., & Spector, P. (1996). The impact of cross-training on team functioning: An empirical investigation. Human Factors, 38(1), 87-100.
74.
Who'd want to work in a team? (2003). Nature , 424, 1.
75.
Woodman, R.W., & Sherwood, J.J. (1980). Effects of team development intervention: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 16, 211-227.
76.
Wuchty, S., Jones, B.F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316, 1036-1039.
77.
Yukl, G. (1998). An evaluative essay on current conceptions of effective leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8, 33-48.
78.
Zaccaro, S.J., Rittman, A.L., & Marks, M.A. (2001). Team leadership. Leadership Quarterly , 12, 451-483.
79.
Zaccaro, S.J., & Klimoski, R. (2002). The interface of leadership and team processes . Group & Organization Management, 27, 4-13.
