This study focused on the introduction of roles as a scripting tool in asynchronous text-based discussion groups. Five roles were selected: source searcher, theoretician, summarizer, moderator, and starter. Because existing research on role assignment often neglects to check whether the role assignment is successful, the main goal was to examine to what extent the participants enacted assigned roles. The study took place in the 1st year of a university course in Instructional Sciences (N = 200). Quantitative content analysis of students' postings was performed, and logistic regressions revealed that all participants enacted the roles they were assigned. The participants generally did not neglect other activities while discussing. The introduction of roles appeared to be a successful structuring intervention.
Aviv, R. (2000). Educational performance of ALN via content analysis . Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4, 53-72. Retrieved September 1, 2006, from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v4n2/v4n2_aviv.asp
2.
Buchs, C., Butera, F., & Mugny, G. (2004). Resource interdependence, student interactions and performance in cooperative learning. Educational Psychology , 24, 291-314.
3.
Cohen, E.G. (1994). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (2nd ed.). New York : Teachers College Press.
4.
De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2007). Applying multilevel modelling to content analysis data: Methodological issues in the study of role assignment in asynchronous discussion groups. Learning and Instruction, 17, 436-447.
5.
Gray, B. (2004). Informal learning in an online community of practice . Journal of Distance Education, 19, 20-35.
6.
Hara, N., Bonk, C.J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28, 115-152.
7.
Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Lambiotte, J.G., Dansereau, D.F., & O'Donnell, A.M. (1987). Manipulating cooperative scripts for teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 424-430.
9.
Mason, R. (1991). Moderating educational computer conferencing. Deosnews, 1. Retrieved September 1, 2006, from http://www.emoderators.com/papers/mason.html
O'Donnell, A.M., Dansereau, D.F., Hall, R.R., & Rocklin, T.R. (1987). Cognitive, social/affective, and metacognitive outcomes of scripted cooperative learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 431-437.
12.
Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2005). The impact of role assignment on knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups: A multilevel analysis. Small Group Research, 36, 704-745.
13.
Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., Valcke, M., & De Wever, B. (2007). Learning in asynchronous discussion groups: A multilevel approach to study the influence of student, group, and task characteristics . Behaviour & Information Technology, 26, 55-71.
14.
Strijbos, J.W., & Martens, R.L. (2001). Coördinatieprocessen tijdens computer ondersteund samenwerkend leren [Coordination processes during computer-supported collaborative learning]. In P. Kirschner (Ed.), Factoren die collaboratief leren beïnvloeden: Onderwijs research dagen 2001 (pp. 1-17). Heerlen, the Netherlands: Onderwijstechnologisch Expertisecentrum, OTEC, Open Universiteit Nederland .
15.
Strijbos, J.W., Martens, R.L., Jochems, W., & Broers, N.J. (2004). The effect of functional roles on group efficiency: Using multilevel modelling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups. Small Group Research, 35, 195-229.
16.
Tagg, A.C. (1994). Leadership from within: Student moderation of computer conferences. American Journal of Distance Education , 8, 40-50.
17.
Weinberger, A., Reiserer, M., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Facilitating collaborative knowledge construction in computer-mediated learning environments with cooperation scripts. In R. Bromme, F. W. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication (pp. 15-38). Boston: Kluwer.
18.
Zhu, E. (1996). Meaning negotiation, knowledge construction, and mentoring in a distance learning course. In Proceedings of selected research and development presentations at the 1996 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 821-844). Indianapolis, IN. Retrieved July 1, 2008, from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=ED397849
19.
Zhu, E. (1998). Learning and mentoring: Electronic discussion in a distance-learning course. In C. J. Bonk & K. S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship and discourse (pp. 233-259). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
20.
Zigurs, I., & Kozar, K.A. (1994). An exploratory study of roles in computer-supported groups. MIS Quarterly, 18, 277-297.
