This study proposes that individual competitive expectations play a critical role in understanding team performance, as expectations shape individual reactions to team behaviors. Expectations, of course, do not always match behavior. When an individual thinks a team task is going to be easy and cooperative and instead meets with competitive rather than cooperative behaviors, that individual is likely to be frustrated and unwilling to work with others in the team. On the other hand, if an individual expects a difficult time in the team and meets with cooperative teammates, that individual could be suspicious and similarly unlikely to work collaboratively. Findings from a lab study using a team negotiation task support the argument that a match between competitive expectations and two emergent team behaviors—team strategy (what the team members say) and team communication tone (how the team members say it)—is critical in determining both team member satisfaction and team performance.
Abelson, R.P., Aronson, E., McGuire, W.J., Newcomb, T.M., Rosenberg, M.J., & Tannenbaum, P.H. (1968). Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook. Chicago: Rand-McNally .
2.
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. ( 1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Bryk, A.S., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
4.
Diekmann, K.A., Tenbrunsel, A.E., & Galinsky, A.D. (2003). From self-prediction to self-defeat: Behavioral forecasting, self-fulfilling prophecies, and the effect of competitive expectations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 672-683.
5.
Dineen, B.R., Noe, R.A., Shaw, J.D., Duffy, M.K., & Wiethoff, C. ( 2007). Level and dispersion of satisfaction in teams: Using foci and social context to explain the satisfaction-absenteeism relationship . Academy of Management Journal, 50, 623-643.
6.
Duffy, M.K., & Shaw, J.D. ( 2000). The Salieri syndrome: Consequences of envy in groups . Small Group Research, 31, 3-23.
7.
Fang, C., Kimbrough, S.O., Valluri, A., & Zheng, Z. ( 2002). On adaptive emergence of trust behavior in the game of StagHunt. Group Decision and Negotiation, 11, 449-467.
8.
Fiske, S.T., & Taylor, S.E. ( 1984). Social cognition. New York: Random House.
9.
Kelley, H.H., & Stahelski, A.J. (1970). The inference of intentions from moves in the prisoner’s dilemma game. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 401-419.
10.
Langfred, C.W. ( 2004). Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 385-399.
Liden, R.C., Wayne, S.J., & Stilwell, D. ( 1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 662-674.
13.
Louis, M.L. ( 1980). Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 226-251.
14.
McAllister, D.J. ( 1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24-59.
15.
Meiners, E.B., & Miller, V.D. ( 2004). The effect of formality and relational tone on supervisor/subordinate negotiation episodes. Western Journal of Communication, 68, 302-321.
16.
Neale, M.A., Northcraft, G.B., Magliozzi, T., & Bazerman, M.H. (1985). The buyer-seller transaction: A simulation of integrative bargaining in a competitive market. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 10, 28-38.
17.
Pruitt, D.G. ( 1981). Negotiation behavior. New York: Academic Press.
18.
Pruitt, D.G., & Carnevale, P.J. (1982). The development of integrative agreements. In V. J. Derlega & J. Grzelak (Eds.), Cooperation and helping behavior: Theories and research (pp. 151-181). New York: Academic Press.
19.
Pruitt, D.G., & Rubin, J.Z. ( 1986). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement . New York: Random House.
20.
Robinson, S.L. ( 1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 574-599.
21.
Rockmann, K.W., & Northcraft, G.B. (2008). To be or not to be trusted: The influence of media richness on defection and deception. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107, 106-122.
22.
Rozell, E.J., & Gundersen, D.E. (2003). The effects of leader impression management on group perceptions of cohesion, consensus, and communication . Small Group Research, 34, 197-222.
23.
Rousseau, D.M. ( 1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24.
Seddon, F.A., & Biasutti, M. ( 2009). Modes of communication between members of a string quartet . Small Group Research, 40, 115-137.
25.
Wall, V.D., & Nolan, L.L. ( 1987). Small group conflict: A look at equity, satisfaction, and styles of conflict management. Small Group Research, 18, 188-211.
26.
Wanous, J.P., Poland, T.D., Premack, S.L., & Davis, K.S. ( 1992). The effects of met expectations on newcomer attitudes and behaviors: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 288-297.
Weingart, L.R., Bennett, R.J., & Brett, J.M. ( 1993). The impact of consideration of issues and motivational orientation on group negotiation process and outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 504-517.
29.
Weingart, L.R., Brett, J.M., Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. ( 2007). Conflicting social motives in negotiating groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 994-1010.
30.
Weingart, L.R., Hyder, E.B., & Prietula, M.J. (1996). Knowledge matters: The effect of tactical descriptions on negotiation behavior and outcome. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1205-1217.
31.
Weingart, L.R., Thompson, L.L., Bazerman, M.H., & Carroll, J.S. ( 1990). Tactical behavior and negotiation outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1, 7-31.
