Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Keywords

small groups decision making juries death penalty group methods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arkes, H.R. , & Mellers, B.A. ( 2002). Do juries meet our expectations? Law and Human Behavior, 26, 625-639.

Carter, L.E. , & Kreitzberg, E. (2004). Understanding capital punishment law. Newark, NJ: Matthew Bender /LexisNexis.

Diamond, S.S. ( 1997). Illuminations and shadows from jury simulations. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 561-571.

Diamond, S.S. , & Rose, M.R. ( 2005). Real juries. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1, 255-284.

Rosenberg, D. ( 2004, August 9). Death penalty: Cameras report, the jury decides . Newsweek. Retrieved from http://www.newsweek.com/id/54776

SunWolf. (2007). Facilitating death talk: Creating collaborative courtroom conversations about the death penalty between attorneys and jurors. In L. R. Frey & K. Carragee (Eds.), Communication activism (Vol. 1, pp. 273-309). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

SunWolf , & Seibold, D.R. (1998). Jurors’ intuitive rules for deliberation: A structurational approach to the study of communication in jury decision making. Communication Monographs, 65, 282-307.