As the concluding article of the special issue from the Lorentz, Netherlands workshop, “New Frontiers in Analyzing Dynamic Group Interactions: Bridging Social and Computer Science,” the authors describe ways in which computer scientists and social scientists can integrate their work to pursue interdisciplinary that can satisfy the research agendas of both sets of scholars.
AllenJ. A.FisherC.ChetouaniM.ChiuM. M.GunesH.MehuM.HungH. (2017). Comparing social science and computer science workflow processes for studying group interactions. Small Group Research, 48, 568-90. doi: 10.1177/1046496417721747
2.
BeckS. J.MeineckeA. L.MatsuyamaY.LeeC.-C. (2017). Initiating and maintaining collaborations and facilitating understanding in interdisciplinary group research. Small Group Research, 48, 532-543. doi: 10.1177/1046496417721746.
3.
BuengelerC.KlonekF. E.Lehmann-WillenbrockN.MorencyL.-P.PoppeR. W. (2017). Killer apps: Criteria and interdisciplinary opportunities for enhancing team communication and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 48, 591-620. doi: 10.1177/1046496417721745
4.
Falk-KrzesinskiH.ContractorN.FioreS.HallK.KaneC.KeytonJ.. . . TrochimW. (2011). Mapping a research agenda for the science of team science. Research Evaluation, 20, 143-156. doi:10.3152/095820211X12941371876580
5.
FioreS. M. (2008). Interdisciplinarity as teamwork: How the science of teams can inform team science. Small Group Research, 39, 251-277. doi:10.1177/1046496408317797
6.
JackR. E.SchynsP. G. (2017). Toward a social psychophysics of face communication. In FiskeS. T.SchacterD. L.TaylorS. E. (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology (Vol. 68, pp.269-297). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044242
7.
JohnsonR.MacphersonC.SmithA.BlockR.KeytonJ. (2016). Facilitating teamwork in adolescent and young adult (AYA) oncology. Journal of Oncology Practice. doi:10.1200/JOP.2016.013870
8.
Lehmann-WillenbrockN.HungH.KeytonJ. (2017). New frontiers in analyzing dynamic group interactions: Bridging social and computer science. Small Group Research, 48, 519-531. doi: 10.1177/1046496417721745
9.
MorelandR. L. (2010). Are dyads really groups?Small Group Research, 41, 251-267. doi:10.1177/1046496409358618
10.
Reiter-PalmonR.SinhaT.GeversJ.OdobezJ.-M.VolpeG. (2017). Theories and models of teams and groups. Small Group Research, 48, 544-567. doi: 10.1177/1046496417722841
11.
SalazarM. R.LantT. K.FioreS. M.SalasE. (2012). Innovation in diverse science teams through integrative capacity. Small Group Research, 43, 527-558. doi:10.1177/1046496412453622
