This study examines the simultaneous effect of leader-member exchange (LMX) and coworker exchange (CWX) on employees’ helping behavior. It proposes that the congruence and incongruence of LMX and CWX have both a linear and curvilinear relationship with helping behavior. Hypotheses were tested on a final sample of 881 participants at hospitals in Taiwan. After controlling for relevant variables, results of a polynomial regression and response surface methodology indicate a positive linear relationship between the simultaneous effect of the congruence of LMX and CWX and employees’ helping behavior, but do not confirm a curvilinear relationship, whereas the simultaneous effect of the incongruence of LMX and CWX has a curvilinear relationship with employees’ helping behavior but not a linear relationship. The theoretical and practical implications, strengths and limitations, and directions for future research are discussed.
BakerC. R.Omilion-HodgesL. M. (2013). The effect of leader-member exchange differentiation within work units on coworker exchange and organizational citizenship behaviors. Communication Research Reports, 30(4), 313–322. http://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2013.837387
2.
BalaH.VenkateshV.GansterD. C.RaiA. (2021). How does an enterprise system implementation change interpersonal relationships in organizations. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(8), 1824–1847. http://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-06-2020-0380
3.
BauerT. N.ErdoganB.LidenR. C.WayneS. J. (2006). A longitudinal study of the moderating role of extraversion: Leader-member exchange, performance, and turnover during new executive development. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 298–310. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.298
4.
BlauP. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley & Sons.
5.
BoxG. E. P.DraperN. R. (1987). Empirical model-building and response surfaces. John Wiley & Sons.
6.
BrislinR. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In TriandisH. C.BerryJ. W. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Methodology (Vol. 2, pp. 389–444). Allyn & Bacon.
7.
ChenG.SharmaP. N. (2012). Bring together the Yin and Yang of social exchanges in teams. In deL. T.EbyT.AllenT. D. (Eds.), Personal relationship: The effect on employee attitudes, behavior, and well-being (pp. 221–233). Taylor & Francis.
8.
ChenS.BoucherH. C.TapiasM. P. (2006). The relational self revealed: Integrative conceptualization and implications for interpersonal life. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 151–179. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.151
9.
ChiaburuD. S.HarrisonD. A. (2008). Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1082–1103. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1082
10.
ChoiJ. N. (2009). Multilevel and cross-level effects of workplace attitudes and group member relations on interpersonal helping behavior. Human Performance, 19(4), 383–402. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1904_4
11.
ColeM. S.Schaninger Jr, W. S., & Harris, S. G. (2002). The workplace social exchange network: A multilevel, conceptual examination. Group & Organization Management, 27(1), 142–167. http://doi.org/10.1177/1059601102027001008
12.
CropanzanoR.MitchellM. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. http://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
13.
DansereauF.GraenG.HagaW. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 46–78. http://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(75)90005-7
14.
DulebohnJ. H.BommerW. H.LidenR. C.BrouerR. L.FerrisG. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715–1759. http://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311415280
15.
EbyL. T.deT.AllenT. D. (2012). Personal relationships: The effect on employee attitudes, behaviour and well-being. Taylor & Francis.
16.
EdwardsJ. R. (1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58(1), 51–100. http://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1029
17.
EdwardsJ. R. (2002). Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. In DrasgowF.SchmittN. W. (Eds.), Advances in measurement and data analysis (pp. 350–400). Jossey-Bass.
18.
EdwardsJ. R.ParryM. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1577–1613. https://doi.org/10.5465/256822
19.
EisenbergerR.FasoloP. M.Davis-LaMastroV. (1990). Perceived organizational support on employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal Applied Psychology, 75(1), 51–59. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.1.51
ErdoganB.EndersJ. (2007). Support from the top: Supervisors’ perceived organizational support as a moderator of leader-member exchange to satisfaction and performance relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 321–330. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.321
22.
FarhJ. L.LeeC.FarhC. I. C. (2010). Task conflict and team creativity: A question of how much and when. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1173–1180. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0020015
23.
GerstnerC. R.DayD. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827–844. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827
24.
GlombT. M.BhaveD. P.MinerA. G.WallM. (2011). Doing good, feeling good: Examining the role of organizational citizenship behaviors in changing mood. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 191–223. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01206.x
25.
GoldenT. D.VeigaJ. F. (2008). The impact of superior-subordinate relationships on the commitment, job satisfaction, and performance of virtual workers. Leadership Quarterly, 19(1), 77–88. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.12.009
26.
GouldnerA. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178. http://doi.org/10.2307/2092623
27.
GraenG. (1976). Role-making processes within complex organizations. In DunnetteM. D. (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1201–1245). Rand McNally.
28.
GraenG. B.ScanduraT. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175–208.
29.
GraenG. B.Uhl-BienM. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. http://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
30.
HalbeslebenJ. R. B. (2012). Positive coworker exchanges. In deL. T.EbyT.AllenT. D. (Eds.), Personal relationship: The effect on employee attitudes, behavior, and well-being (pp. 107–130). Taylor & Francis.
31.
HarrisK. J.WheelerA. R.KacmarK. M. (2009). Leader-member exchange and empowerment: Direct and interactive effects on job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and performance. Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 371–382. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.006
32.
HendersonD. J.WayneS. J.ShoreL. M.BommerW. H.TetrickL. E. (2008). Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and psychological contract fulfillment: A multilevel examination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1208–1019. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0012678
33.
HooperD.CoughlanJ.MullenM. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
34.
HuiC.LawK.ChenZ. X. (1999). A structural equation model of the effects of negative affectivity, leader-member exchange, and perceived job mobility on in-role and extra-role performance: A Chinese case. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77(1), 3–21. http://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2812
35.
HumbergS.NestlerS.BackM. D. (2019). Response surface analysis in personality and social psychology: Checklist and clarifications for the case of congruence hypotheses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(3), 409–419. http://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618757600
36.
IliesR.NahrgangJ. D.MorgesonF. P. (2007). Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 269–277. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.269
37.
KacmarK. M.WittL. A.ZivnuskaS.GullyS. M. (2003). The interactive effect of leader-member exchange and communication frequency on performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 764–772. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.764
38.
KahnW. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://www.jstor.org/stable/256287
39.
KatzD.KahnR. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
40.
KerrS.JermierJ. M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22(3), 374–403. http://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(78)90023-5
41.
LaiF. Y.LinC. C.LuS. C.ChenH. L. (2021). The role of team-member exchange in proactive personality and employees’ proactive behaviors: The moderating effect of transformational leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 28(4), 429–443. http://doi.org/10.1177/15480518211034847
42.
LaiF. Y.LuS. C.LinC. C.LeeY. C. (2019). The doctrine of the mean: Workplace relationships and turnover intention. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 36(1), 84–96. http://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1481
43.
LamC. F.SprettzerG.FritzC. (2014). Too much of a good thing: Curvilinear effect of positive affect on proactive behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(4), 530–546. http://doi.org/10.1002/job.1906
44.
LeH.OhI. S.RobbinsS. B.IliesR.HollandE.WestrickP. (2011). Too much of a good thing: Curvilinear relationship between personality traits and job performance. Journal Applied Psychology, 96(1), 113–133. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0021016
45.
LidenR. C.SparroweR. T.WayneS. J. (1997). Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. In FerrisG. R.RowlandK. M. (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 15, pp. 47–119). JAI Press.
46.
LiuJ.LeeA.LiX.LiC. R. (2021). The role of change in the relationships Between leader-member exchange/coworker exchange and newcomer performance: A latent growth modeling approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–13. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.600712
47.
MajorD. A.KozlowskiS. W.ChaoG. T.GardnerP. D. (1995). A longitudinal investigation of newcomer expectations, early socialization outcomes, and the moderating effects of role development factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(3), 418–431. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.3.418
48.
MartinR.GuillaumeY.ThomasG.LeeA.EpitropakiO. (2016). Leader-member exchange (LMX) and performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 67–121. http://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12100
49.
MyersR. H. (1971). Response surface methodology. Allyn & Bacon.
50.
NgT. W. H.FeldmanD. C.ButtsM. M. (2014). Psychological contract breaches and employee voice behaviour: The moderating effects of changes in social relationship. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(4), 537–553. http://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2013.766394
51.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
52.
RiousS. M.PennerL. A. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: A motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1306–1314. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1306
53.
ScanduraT. A.GraenG. B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader-member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 428–436. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.428
SchönbrodtF. D. (2016b, November25). Testing fit patterns with polynomial regression models. OSF. http://osf.io/3889z
56.
SchriesheimC. A.CastroS. L.YammarinoF. J. (2000). Investigating contingencies: An examination of the impact of span of supervision and upward controllingness on leader-member exchange using traditional and multivariate within- and between-entities analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 659–677. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.659
57.
SeersA. (1989). Team-member exchange quality: A new construct for role-making research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43(1), 118–135. http://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(89)90060-5
58.
SettoonR. P.BennettN.LidenR. C. (1996). Social exchange in organization: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 219–227. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.219
59.
SheronyK. M.GreenS. G. (2002). Coworker exchange: Relationships between coworkers, leader-member exchange, and work attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 542–548. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.542
60.
ShinY.KimM. S.ChoiJ. N.KimM.OhW. K. (2017). Does leader-follower regulatory fit matter? The role of regulatory fit in followers’ organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Management, 43(4), 1211–1233. http://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314546867
61.
SparroweR. T.LidenR. C. (1997). Process and structure in leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 522–552. http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1997.9707154068
62.
TangY.LamC. K.OuyangK.HuangX.TseH. H. (2021). Comparisons draw us close: The influence of leader-member exchange dyadic comparison on coworker exchange. Personnel Psychology, 75(1), 215–240. http://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12465
63.
TepperB. J.DuffyM. K.HooblerJ.EnsleyM. D. (2004). Moderators of the relationships between coworkers’ organizational citizenship behavior and fellow employees’ attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 455–465. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.455
64.
Uhl-BienM.MaslynJ. M. (2003). Reciprocity in manager-subordinate relationships: Components, configurations, and outcomes. Journal of Management, 29(4), 511–532. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063_03_00023-0
65.
Van DyneL.CummingsL. L.ParksJ.M. (1995). Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, 215–285.
66.
Van DyneL.LePineJ. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behavior. Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108–119. https://www.jstor.org/stable/256902
67.
WangH.LawK. S.HackettR. D.WangD.ChenZ. X. (2005). Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 420–432. http://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17407908
68.
WangL. C.HollenbeckJ. R. (2019). LMX in team-based contexts: TMX, authority differentiation, and skill differentiation as boundary conditions for leader reciprocation. Personnel Psychology, 72(2), 271–290. http://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12306
69.
WilliamsL. J.AndersonS. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601–617. http://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305
70.
WuC. H. (2008). An examination of the wording effect in the Rosenberg self-esteem scale among culturally Chinese people. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148(5), 535–552. http://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.148.5.535-552
71.
YoungH. R.GlerumD. R.JosephD. L.McCordM. A. (2021). A meta-analysis of transactional leadership and follower performance: Double-edged effects of LMX and empowerment. Journal of Management, 47(5), 1255–1280. http://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320908646
