In this article, the authors describe the advantages they have discovered of simulations over real-life tasks on materials development courses they have run together in different parts of the world. They outline the principles, objectives, and procedures of the types of simulations they have used and describe examples of simulations to illustrate their points. In particular, they stress the value of simulations in providing a rich but economical experience that the participants are helped to respond to through a simplification of the reference system. This provides focus and direction but challenges the participants to discover and develop ideas and solutions for themselves. In this way, simulations are able to aid the development of both theoretical understanding and practical skills and to contribute to the development of self-confidence and self-esteem.
Arnold, J.
(1998). Visualization: Language learning with the mind’s eye. In J. Arnold (Ed.), Affect in language learning(pp. 260-278). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Burns, A. C.
, & Gentry, J. W. (1998). Motivating students to engage in experiential learning: A tension-tolearn theory. Simulation & Gaming, 29(2), 133-151.
3.
Christison, M. A.
(1998). Applying multiple intelligence theory in preservice and inservice TEFL education programs. English Teaching Forum, 36(2), 2-13.
4.
Crookall, D.
(1991). Experiential teacher education: A case study in TESOL. Simulation/Games for Learning, 21(1), 7-30.
5.
Crookall, D.
, Oxford, R.,& Saunders, D. (1987). Towards a reconceptualization of simulation: From representation to reality. Simulation/Games for Learning, 17(4), 147-171.
6.
Dewey, J.
(1938). Experience and education. United States: Kappa Delta Pi.
7.
Di Pietro, R. J.
(1987). Strategic interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Gardner, H.
(1993). Multiple intelligence: The theory and practice. New York: Basic Books.
9.
Greenblat, C. T.
(1981). Basic concepts and linkages. In C. T. Greenblat& R. D. Duke (Eds.), Principles and practices of gaming-simulation(pp. 19-24). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
Greenblat, C. T.
, & Duke, R. D. (Eds.). (1981). Principles and practices of gaming-simulation.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11.
Herz, B.
, & Merz, W. (1998). Experiential learning and the effectiveness of economic simulation games. Simulation & Gaming, 29(2), 238-250.
12.
Jones, K.
(1985). Designing your own simulations. London: Methuen.
13.
Jones, K.
(1995). Simulations: A handbook for teachers and trainers(3rd ed.). London: Kogan Page.
14.
Kolb, D.
(1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15.
Kolb, D.
, Rubin, I. M., & McIntyre, D. J. (1986). Organizational psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16.
Laing, R. D.
(1995). The politics of experience. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17.
Lederman, L. C.
(1992). Debriefing: Towards a systematic assessment of theory and practice. Simulation& Gaming, 23(2), 145-160.
18.
Lewin, K.
(1951). Field theory in social sciences. New York: Harper & Row.
19.
Lozanov, G.
(1978). Suggestology and outlines of suggestopedy. London: Gordon and Breach.
20.
Masuhara, H. (1998). Factors influencing the reading difficulties of advanced learners of English as a foreign language when reading authentic texts. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Luton.
21.
Molden, D.
(1996). Managing with the power of NLP: Neuro-linguistic programming for personal competitive advantage. London: Pitman.
22.
Oxford, R. L.
(1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
23.
Peters, V.
, Vissers, G., & Heijne, G. (1998). The validity of games. Simulation & Gaming,29(1), 20-30.
24.
Piaget, J.
(1971). Psychology and epistemology. Middlesex, UK: Penguin.
25.
Raser, J. R.
(1969). Simulation and society: An exploration of scientific gaming. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
26.
Reid, J.
(1997). Understanding learning styles in the second language classroom. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall/Regents.
27.
Rogers, C. R.
(1969). Freedom to learn. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
28.
Sadoski, M.
, & Paivio, A. (1994). A dual coding view of imagery and verbal processes in reading comprehension. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell,& H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading(4th ed., pp. 582-601). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
29.
Schumann, J. H.
(1998). A neurobiological perspective on affect and methodology in second language learning. In J. Arnold (Ed.), Affect in language learning(pp. 260-278). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Segalowitz, N.
,& Lightbown, P. M. (1999). Psycholinguistic approaches to SLA. Annual Reviewof Applied Linguistics, 19, 43-63.
31.
Skinner, B. F.
(1971). Contingences of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
32.
Sokolov, A. N.
(1972). Inner speech and thought. New York: Plenum.
33.
Tomlinson, B.
(1994). Pragmatic awareness activities. Language Awareness, 3(3/4), 119-129.
34.
Tomlinson, B.
(1996). Helping L2 readers to see. In T. Hickey & J. Williams (Eds.), Language, education and society in a changing world(pp. 252-263). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
35.
Tomlinson, B. (1997). The role of literature in the reading of literature in a foreign language. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.
36.
Tomlinson, B.
(1998a). Review of a framework for task-based learning. ELT Journal, 52(3), 257-259.
37.
Tomlinson, B.
(1998b). Seeing what they mean: Helping L2 learners to visualise. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching(pp. 265-278). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Tomlinson, B.
(1999). Developing criteria for materials evaluation. IATEFL Issues, 147, 10-13.
39.
Tomlinson, B.
(in press-a). Creating meaning with the inner voice. Journal of Imagination in Language Learning.
40.
Tomlinson, B.
(in press-b). Talking to yourself: The role of the inner voice in language learning. Applied Language Learning.
41.
van Ments, M.
(1983). The effective use of role play: A handbook for teachers and trainers. London: Kogan Page.
42.
Weil, S. W.
, & McGill, I. (1989). Making sense of experiential learning: Diversity in theory and practice. Buckingham, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
43.
Williams, L.
(1984). Teaching for the two-sided mind: Aguide to right brain/left brain education. New York: Simon & Schuster.
44.
Willis, J.1997. A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.
45.
Yeo, G. K.
,& Tan, S. T. (1999). Toward a multilingual, experiential environment for learning decision technology. Simulation & Gaming, 30(1), 70-82.
