This article demonstrates the advantages of using visualization as part of the modeling process. Several examples are given to show how visualization can help developers to more completely understand the range of behaviors for their algorithms. Specifically, the Cobb Douglas function and Gold and Pray demand system are examined using a tool that combines mathematical modeling with visualization capabilities.
Anscombe, F. J.
(1973). Graphs in statistical analysis. American Statistician, 27, 17-21.
2.
Carvalho, G. F.
(1991). Theoretical development of a market demand function for business simulators. Development in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 18, 11-14.
3.
Carvalho, G. F.
(1993). A dynamic market share allocation model for computerized business simulations. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 20, 31-33.
4.
Carvalho, G. F.
(1995). Modeling the Lawof Demand in Business Simulators. Simulation& Gaming, 26(1), 60-79.
5.
Decker, R.
, LaBarre, J.,& Adler, T. (1987). The exponential logarithm function as an algorithm for business simulation. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 14, 47-49.
6.
Gold, S. C.
(1990). Modeling cost functions in computerized business simulations. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 17, 70-72.
7.
Gold, S. C.
(1992). Modeling short-run cost and production functions in computerized business simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 23(4), 417-430.
8.
Gold, S. C.
(1993). Modeling interactive effects in mathematical functions for business simulations: A critique of Goosen and Kusel’s interpolation approach. Simulation & Gaming, 24(1), 90-94.
9.
Gold, S.
, & Pray, T. (1984a). Modeling market and firm level demand functions in computerized business simulations. Simulation & Games, 15(3), 346-363.
10.
Gold, S. C.
, & Pray, T. F. (1984b). Modeling non-price factors in the demand functions of computerized business simulations. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 11, 240-243.
11.
Gold, S. C.
, & Pray, T. F. (1989). The production frontier in computerized business simulations. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 16, 24-30.
12.
Gold, S. C.
, & Pray, T. F. (1995). The use of the gamma probability distribution: A critique of Carvalho’s demand simulator. Simulation & Gaming, 26(1), 80-87.
13.
Gold, S. C.
,& Pray, T. F. (1997). Modeling attributes in demand functions of computerized business simulations: An extension of Teach’s gravity flow algorithm. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 24, 132-141.
14.
Gold, S. C.
, & Pray, T. F. (1998). Technological change and intertemporal movements in consumer preferences in the design of computerized business simulations with market segmentation. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 25, 156-167.
15.
Gold, S. C.
,& Pray, T. F. (1999). Changing customer preferences and product characteristics in the design of demand functions. Simulation & Gaming, 30(3), 264-282.
16.
Golden, P. A.
(1987). Demand generation in a service industry simulation: An algorithmic paradox. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 14, 67-70.
17.
Goosen, K. R.
(1986). An interpolation approach to developing mathematical functions for business simulations. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 13, 248-255.
18.
Goosen, K. R.
, & Kusel, J. (1993a). Achieving interactive variable modeling through interpolation: A response to Gold’s comments. Simulation & Gaming, 24(1), 95-105.
19.
Goosen, K. R.
, & Kusel, J. (1993b). An interpolation approach to developing mathematical functions for business simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 24(1), 76-89.
20.
Lambert, N.E.
, & Lambert, D. R. (1988). Advertising response in the Gold and Pray algorithm: A critical assessment. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 15, 188-191.
21.
Mergen, A. E.
, & Pray, T. F. (1992). Modeling total quality elements into a strategy-oriented simulation. Simulation & Gaming, 23(3), 277-297.
22.
Pray, T.
,& Gold, S. (1982). Inside the black box: An analysis of underlying demand functions in contemporary business simulations. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 9, 110-116.
23.
Pray, T.
, & Methe, D. (1991). Modeling radical changes in technology within strategy-oriented business simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 22, 19-35.
24.
Teach, R.
(1984). Using spatial relationships to estimate demand in business simulations. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 11b, 244-246.
25.
Teach, R.
(1990). Demand equations which include product attributes. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 17, 161-166.
26.
Teach, R.
, & Schwartz, R. (2000). Introducing cross-elasticities in demand equations. Simulation & Gaming, 27(1), 125-131.
27.
Thavikulwat, P.
(1988). Simulating demand in an independent-across-firms management game. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 15, 183-187.
28.
Thavikulwat, P.
(1989). Modeling the human component of business simulations. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 6, 37-40.
29.
Thavikulwat, P.
(1992a). Product quality in business simulations. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 19, 165-168.
30.
Thavikulwat, P.
(1992b). Product quality in computerized business simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 23(4), 431-441.
31.
Thavikulwat, P.
(1993). Multiple industries in computerized business gaming simulations. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 20, 108-109.
32.
Wolfram, S.
(1993). Mathematica®: A system for doing mathematics by computer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
