The research reports by Boyd et al. and Herman et al. provide insights about intervention research with vulnerable populations that highlight often-neglected standards of evidence. This commentary describes linkages of nonspecific therapeutic factors critical to these outcome studies as illustrative of research to practice standards we must continually promote. Embedding intervention research with iterative links to service system and implementation research provides a framework for social work to chart future contributions toward closing critical translational gaps.
Brekke, J.S., Ell, K., & Palinkas, L.A. (2007a). Translational science at the National Institute of Mental Health: Can social work take its rightful place? Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 123-133.
2.
Brekke, J.S., Hoe, M., Long, J., & Green, M.F. ( 2007b). How neuro-cognition and social cognition influence functional change during community-based psychosocial rehabilitation for individuals with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 33, 1247-1256.
3.
Flaspohler, P., Duffy, J., Wandersman, A., Stillman, L., & Maras, M.A. ( 2008). Unpacking prevention capacity: An intersection of research-to-practice models and community-centered models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 182-196.
4.
Gehlert, S., Sohmer, D., Sacks, T., Mininger, C., McClintock, M., & Olopade, O. ( 2008). Targeting health disparities: A model linking upstream determinants to downstream interventions. Health Affairs, 27, 339-349.
5.
Jensen, P.S., Weersing, R., Hoagwood, K.E., & Goldman, E. ( 2005). What is the evidence for evidence-based treatments? A hard look at our soft underbelly. Mental Health Services Research , 7, 53-74.
6.
Proctor, E.K., & Rosen, A. ( 2008). From knowledge production to implementation: Research challenges and imperatives. Research on Social Work Practice , 18, 285-291.
