While prevention programs improve parenting and reduce maltreatment risks, engaging parents, particularly from marginalized populations, remains challenging. This scoping review systematically examines the implementation of social network strategy as an engagement approach and evaluates its impact on engagement. A systematic search of relevant databases identified 18 eligible studies conducted between 2010 and 2023. These studies utilized social network engagement strategies. A total of 18 studies were identified. Most studies used the social network strategies to target context. Social network strategies demonstrated positive effects on behavioral, attitudinal, and relational engagement. However, few studies applied these strategies in pre- and post-implementation phases, and most lacked social network theoretical frameworks. Most studies used the qualitative methods to evaluate the engagement outcomes. Findings underscore the need for improved theoretical guidance and rigor evaluation of social network strategies. This review offers implications for designing and implementing effective child maltreatment prevention programs.
AltafimE. R. P.LinharesM. B. M. (2016). Universal violence and child maltreatment prevention programs for parents: A systematic review. Psychosocial Intervention, 25(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psi.2015.10.003
2.
AngelakisI.AustinJ. L.GoodingP. (2020). Association of childhood maltreatment with suicide behaviors among young people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Network Open, 3(8), e2012563. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12563
3.
BartleyL.MetzA.FlemingW. O. (2022). What implementation strategies are relational? Using relational theory to explore the ERIC implementation strategies. Frontiers in Health Services, 2, 913585. https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.913585
4.
BroadyT. R.GrayR. M. (2018). The intersection of domestic violence and child protection in Australia: Program participant accounts. Australian Social Work, 71(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2017.1422774
5.
BrownT. L.RoyR. N.DayneN.RoyD. R.JamesA. G.Carrichi-LopezA. (2024). Promoting father engagement among low-income fathers: Fathers’ narratives on what matters in a fatherhood program in the western US. Journal of Family Studies, 30(2), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2023.2216668
6.
BungerA. C.NooraieR. Y. (2020). Social network analysis. In NilsenP.BirkenS. (Eds.), Handbook on implementation science (pp. 487–496). Edward Elgar Publishing.
7.
BungerA. C.Yousefi-NooraieR.WarrenK.CaoQ.DadgostarP.BustosT. E. (2023). Developing a typology of network alteration strategies for implementation: A scoping review and iterative synthesis. Implementation Science, 18(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01266-3
8.
CabassaL J (2016). Implementation science: Why it matters for the future of social work. Journal of Social Work Education, 52(1), S38–S50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.1174648
9.
CaoY.BungerA. C.HoffmanJ. (2019). Caregiver engagement in the behavioral health screening and assessment for child welfare-involved children: Child welfare and behavioral health workers’ perspectives. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 13(1), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2018.1494665
10.
ChenM.ChanK. L. (2016). Effects of parenting programs on child maltreatment prevention: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014566718
11.
ChouH. W.LinY. H.LuH. S.ChangH. H.ChouS. B. (2014). Knowledge sharing and ERP system usage in post-implementation stage. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.023
12.
CicchettiD.HetzelS.RogoschF. A.HandleyE. D.TothS. L. (2016). An investigation of child maltreatment and epigenetic mechanisms of mental and physical health risk. Development and Psychopathology, 28(4, Pt. 2), 1305–1317. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579416000869
13.
CollinsC. M.RussellB. S. (2021). Collaborative language systems: Engaging high-risk adolescent fathers. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 38(3), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-020-00676-2
14.
CorsoP. S.FangX.BegleA. M.DumasJ. (2010). Predictors of engagement in a parenting intervention designed to prevent child maltreatment. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 11(3), 235–241.
15.
Edwards-GauraA.WhitakerD.Self-BrownS. (2014). Can social networking be used to promote engagement in child maltreatment prevention programs? Two pilot studies. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 15(5), 575. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2014.4.21413
16.
FarrellA. F.LujánM. L.BritnerP. A.RandallK. G.GoodrichS. A. (2012). I am part of every decision’: Client perceptions of engagement within a supportive housing child welfare programme. Child & Family Social Work, 17(2), 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00831.x
17.
FeatherstoneB.BroadhurstK. (2003). Engaging parents and carers with family support services: What can be learned from research on help-seeking?Child & Family Social Work, 8(4), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2206.2003.00289.x
18.
GonzalezJ. C.KleinC. C.BarnettM. L.SchatzN. K.GaroosiT.ChackoA.FabianoG. A. (2023). Intervention and implementation characteristics to enhance father engagement: A systematic review of parenting interventions. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 26(2), 445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-023-00430-x
19.
GoodmanM. S.ThompsonV. L. S. (2017). The science of stakeholder engagement in research: Classification, implementation, and evaluation. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 7(3), 486–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-017-0495-z
20.
GuastaferroK.Self-BrownS.ShanleyJ. R.WhitakerD. J.LutzkerJ. R. (2020). Engagement in home visiting: An overview of the problem and how a coalition of researchers worked to address this cross-model concern. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29(1), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1279-x
21.
HardcastleK. A.BellisM. A.HughesK.SethiD. (2015). Implementing child maltreatment prevention programmes: What the experts say. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/326346.
22.
HawleyK. M.WeiszJ. R. (2005). Youth versus parent working alliance in usual clinical care: Distinctive associations with retention, satisfaction, and treatment outcome. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 34(1), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3401_11
23.
Hernandez RodriguezJ.LópezC.MorelandA. (2020). Evaluating incentive strategies on parental engagement of the PACE parenting program. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29(7), 1957–1969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-020-01730-4
24.
HillisS.MercyJ.AmobiA.KressH. (2016). Global prevalence of past-year violence against children: A systematic review and minimum estimates. Pediatrics, 137(3), e20154079. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-4079
25.
HockR.PriesterM. A.IachiniA. L.BrowneT.DeHartD.CloneS. (2015). A review of family engagement measures for adolescent substance use services. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(12), 3700–3710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0178-7
26.
HokkeS.HackworthN. J.BennettsS. K.NicholsonJ. M.KeyzerP.LuckeJ.ZionL.CrawfordS. B. (2020). Ethical considerations in using social media to engage research participants: Perspectives of Australian researchers and ethics committee members. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(1–2), 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619854629
27.
HoltS.KirwanG.NgoJ. (2015). Groupwork interventions for women and children experiencing domestic abuse: Do they work and do they last?Groupwork, 25(1), 8–33. https://doi.org/10.1921/gpwk.v25i1.840
28.
Jones HardenB.SimonsC.Johnson-MotoyamaM.BarthR. (2020). The child maltreatment prevention landscape: Where are we now, and where should we go?The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 692(1), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716220978361
29.
KiselyS.AbajobirA. A.MillsR.StrathearnL.ClavarinoA.NajmanJ. M. (2018). Child maltreatment and mental health problems in adulthood: Birth cohort study. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 213(6), 698–703. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2018.207
30.
KleynL. M.HewstoneM.WardC. L.WölferR. (2021). Using longitudinal social network analysis to evaluate a community-wide parenting intervention. Prevention Science, 22(1), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01184-6
31.
LanierP.FreyJ.SmithQ.ChungG. (2019). A quasi-experimental study of a peer support group to enhance protective factors for fathers of children in head start. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(6), 1558–1570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01383-y
32.
LauA. S.FungJ. J.YungV. (2010). Group parent training with immigrant Chinese families: Enhancing engagement and augmenting skills training. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66(8), 880–894. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20711
33.
LeckeyY.StokesA.HickeyG.McGillowayS. (2022). Engagement with a multi-component, preventative program to reduce child maltreatment: Program satisfaction and acceptability. Clinical Social Work Journal, 50(4), 358–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-021-00789-w
34.
LoveS. M.SandersM. R.MetzlerC. W.PrinzR. J.KastE. Z. (2013). Enhancing accessibility and engagement in evidence-based parenting programs to reduce maltreatment: Conversations with vulnerable parents. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 7(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2012.701837
35.
LoveS.SandersM.TurnerK.MaurangeM.KnottT.PrinzR.MetzlerC.AinsworthA. (2016). Social media and gamification: Engaging vulnerable parents in an online evidence-based parenting program. Child Abuse & Neglect, 53, 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.10.031
36.
McCurdyK.DaroD.AnisfeldE.KatzevA.KeimA.LeCroyC.McAfeeC.NelsonC.FalconnierL.McGuiganW. M.ParkJ. K.SandyJ.WinjeC. (2006). Understanding maternal intentions to engage in home visiting programs. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(10), 1195–1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.11.010
37.
MehraA.KilduffM.BrassD. J. (1998). At the margins: A distinctiveness approach to the social identity and social networks of underrepresented groups. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.5465/257083
38.
MetzA.AlbersB.BurkeK.BartleyL.LouisonL.WardC.FarleyA. (2021). Implementation practice in human service systems: Understanding the principles and competencies of professionals who support implementation. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 45(3), 238–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2021.1895401
39.
MinM. O.MinnesS.KimH.SingerL. T. (2013). Pathways linking childhood maltreatment and adult physical health. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37(6), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.09.008
40.
MirickR. G. (2013). An unsuccessful partnership: Behavioral compliance and strengths-based child welfare practice. Families in Society, 94(4), 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.4323
41.
MitnickD. M.HeymanR. E.SlepA. M. S.LorberM. L.DillsA. L. (2021). Evidence-based social work outreach to military leaders to facilitate intimate partner violence and child maltreatment identification and referral: An evaluation. Journal of Family Social Work, 24(4), 320–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2021.1974141
42.
MoonD. J.NicholsC. B.ZhangY.CruceA.HaranH.SgourakisA.LeeH.Johnson-MotoyamaM. (2023). Engagement measures in maltreatment prevention studies: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(5), 3119–3135. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380231188070
43.
MurphyK.EmbletonL.LachmanJ. M.OwinoE.KirwaS.MakoriD.BraitsteinP. (2021). From analog to digital”: The feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of a positive parenting program for street-connected mothers in Kenya. Children and Youth Services Review, 127, 106077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106077
44.
NaslundJ. A.GrandeS. W.AschbrennerK. A.ElwynG. (2014). Naturally occurring peer support through social media: The experiences of individuals with severe mental illness using YouTube. PLOS ONE, 9(10), e110171. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110171
45.
O’SullivanS.van BerkelN.KostakosV.SchmaalL.D’AlfonsoS.ValentineL.BendallS.NelsonB.GleesonJ. F.Alvarez-JimenezM. (2023). Understanding what drives long-term engagement in digital mental health interventions: Secondary causal analysis of the relationship between social networking and therapy engagement. JMIR Mental Health, 10(1), e44812. https://doi.org/10.2196/44812
46.
PećnikN.NieterauM.ŠpačekM.LeijtenP. (2024). Benefits of the growing up together online parenting program for families in social services in Croatia. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 33(2), 554–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-023-02770-2
47.
PinnaK. L.HansonS.ZhangN.GewirtzA. H. (2017). Fostering resilience in national guard and reserve families: A contextual adaptation of an evidence-based parenting program. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 87(2), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000221
48.
PlattD. (2012). Understanding parental engagement with child welfare services: An integrated model. Child & Family Social Work, 17(2), 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00828.x
ProctorE. K.BungerA. C.Lengnick-HallR.GerkeD. R.MartinJ. K.PhillipsR. J.SwansonJ. C. (2023). Ten years of implementation outcomes research: A scoping review. Implementation Science, 18(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01286-z
51.
RanieriM.MancaS.FiniA. (2012). Why (and how) do teachers engage in social networks? An exploratory study of professional use of Facebook and its implications for lifelong learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 754–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01356.x
52.
RepperJ.CarterT. (2011). A review of the literature on peer support in mental health services. Journal of Mental Health, 20(4), 392–411. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2011.583947
53.
RonaasenJ.SteenkampL.WilliamsM.FinnemoreJ.FeeleyA. (2021). Sakha ESETHU: Nurturing value-centered group work for a community-based parent support programme in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Social Work with Groups, 44(4), 364–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/01609513.2020.1828227
54.
SchoenfelderE. N.SandlerI. N.MillsapR. E.WolchikS. A.BerkelC.AyersT. S. (2013). Caregiver responsiveness to the family bereavement program: What predicts responsiveness? What does responsiveness predict?Prevention Science, 14(6), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-012-0337-7
55.
Self-BrownS.FrederickK.BinderS.WhitakerD.LutzkerJ.EdwardsA.BlankenshipJ. (2011). Examining the need for cultural adaptations to an evidence-based parent training program targeting the prevention of child maltreatment. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(7), 1166–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.02.010
56.
ShenderovichY.EisnerM.CluverL.DoubtJ.BerezinM.MajokweniS.MurrayA. L. (2018). What affects attendance and engagement in a parenting program in South Africa?Prevention Science, 19(7), 977–986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0941-2
57.
SmithJ. D.BerkelC.HailsK. A.DishionT. J.ShawD. S.WilsonM. N. (2018). Predictors of participation in the family check-up program: A randomized trial of yearly services from age 2 to 10 years. Prevention Science, 19(5), 652–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0679-7
58.
SpothR.RedmondC.HockadayC.ShinC. Y. (1996). Barriers to participation in family skills preventive interventions and their evaluations: A replication and extension. Family Relations, 45(3), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.2307/585496
59.
StaudtM. (2007). Treatment engagement with caregivers of at-risk children: Gaps in research and conceptualization. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-006-9077-2
60.
StokesJ. O.JentJ. F.WeinsteinA.DavisE. M.BrownT. M.CruzL.WaveringH. (2016). Does practice make perfect? The relationship between self-reported treatment homework completion and parental skill acquisition and child behaviors. Behavior Therapy, 47(4), 538–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2016.04.004
61.
StolzH. E.LaGraffM. R.MullicanK. N.ConnorL. A.GreenM. J.ClouthierS. (2020). Exploring fathers’ engagement with home visiting: The Tennessee dad project. Families in Society, 101(4), 498–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044389420901640
62.
StrangeC.BennettE.TaitM.HauckY. (2019). A qualitative evaluation of a young parents program (YPP)—parent and facilitator perspectives. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 30(3), 402–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.228
63.
TetleyA.JinksM.HubandN.HowellsK. (2011). A systematic review of measures of therapeutic engagement in psychosocial and psychological treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(9), 927–941. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20811
64.
ToS. M.SoY. Y.ChanT. S. (2014). An exploratory study on the effectiveness and experience of a parent enhancement group adopting a narrative approach. Journal of Social Work, 14(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017313475554
65.
Young-SouthwardG.EatonC.O’ConnorR.MinnisH. (2020). Investigating the causal relationship between maltreatment and cognition in children: A systematic review. Child Abuse & Neglect, 107, 104603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104603
66.
Yousefi NooraieR.WarrenK.JuckettL. A.CaoQ. A.BungerA. C.Patak-PietrafesaM. A. (2021). Individual- and group-level network-building interventions to address social isolation and loneliness: A scoping review with implications for COVID-19. PLOS ONE, 16(6), e0253734. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253734
67.
ZhangY.MoonD.ZhangK.YiY. (2024). Does harsh parenting really harm? A systematic review of studies in China. Child Abuse Review, 33(3), e2873. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2873
