Coteaching at all levels can be difficult, but coteaching at the secondary level in science and mathematics can create unique challenges. This article provides examples of issues related to coteaching at the secondary level in theses critical content areas. Various types of coteaching are presented, and how each type might be integrated into science and mathematics classrooms is discussed. The article concludes with practical ideas and considerations for teachers, administrators, and teacher educators related to coteaching in the areas of science and mathematics.
American Youth Policy Forum and Center on Education Policy. (2002). Twenty-five years of educating children with disabilities: The good news and the work ahead. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
BahamondeC.FriendM. (1999). Teaching English language learners: A proposal for effective service delivery through collaboration and co-teaching. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 10(1), 1–24.
3.
BurgstahlerS.CrawfordL.AcostaJ. (2001). Transition from two-year to four-year institutions for students with disabilities. Disability Studies Quarterly, 21(1), 25–38.
4.
CookL.FriendM. P. (1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(3), 1–16.
5.
DiekerL. A. (1998). Rationale for coteaching. Social Studies Review, 37(2), 62–65.
6.
DiekerL. A. (2011). Summaries of visits to secondary inclusive classrooms. Unpublished manuscript.
7.
DiekerL. A.MacinniP.StricklandT.HuntJ. (2011). Minimizing the weaknesses and maximizing the strengths of students with disabilities through reasoning and sense-making. In StrutchenM.KepnerH. (Eds.), Focus on high school students: Making mathematical reasoning and sense making a reality for all (pp. 35–58). Washington, DC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
8.
FriendM.CookL. (2007). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
9.
HughesC. E.MurawskiW. W. (2001). Lessons from another field: Applying coteaching strategies to gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45(3), 195–204.
10.
Kaiser Family Foundation. (2010). Media in the lives of 8 to 18 year olds. Menlo Park, CA: Author.
11.
LambP.HodgesB.BrownM.FoyD. (2004). Motivating youth with disabilities to learn in the science classroom: A guide for educators. Research to Practice Brief, 3(3), 1–4.
12.
LucknerJ. (1999). An examination of the two co-teaching classrooms. American Annals of the Deaf, 144(1), 24–34.
13.
MacciniP.HughesC. (2000). Effects of a problem-solving strategy on the introductory algebra performance of secondary students with learning disabilitiesLearning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(1), 10–21.
14.
MillerA.ValaskyW.MolloyP. (1998). Learning together: The evolution of an inclusive class. Active Learner, 3(2), 14–16.
15.
MoroccoC. C.AguilarC. M. (2002). Coteaching for content understanding: A school-wide model. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 13(4), 315–347.
16.
MurawskiW. W. (2006). Student outcomes in co-taught secondary English classes: How can we improve?Reading and Writing Quarterly, 22(3), 227–247.
17.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2009). Focus in high school mathematics: Mathematics reasoning and sense making. Reston, VA: Author.
18.
Office of Disability Employment Policy. (2001, November). Improving the availability of community-based services for people with disabilities. Washington, DC: Author.
19.
ParmarR. S.DelucaC. B.JanczakT. M. (1994). Investigations into the relationship between science and language abilities of students with mild disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 15(2), 117–126.
20.
RiceD.ZigmondN. (1999). Co-teaching in secondary schools: Teacher reports of developments in Australia and American classrooms. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED432558)
21.
ScruggsT.MastropieriM.McDuffieK. A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73(4), 392–416.
WeichelW. A. (2001). An analysis of student outcomes on co-taught settings in comparison to other special education service delivery options for students with learning disabilities. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62(07), 2386. (UMI No. 3021407)
24.
WeissM. P.BrighamF. J. (2000). Co-teaching and the model of shared responsibility: What does the research support? In ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities: Educational interventions (pp. 217–246). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
25.
WeissM. P.LloydJ. W. (2002). Congruence between roles and actions of secondary special educators in co-taught and special education settings. Journal of Special Education, 36(2), 58–68.
26.
WelchM. (2000). Descriptive analysis of team teaching in two elementary classrooms: A formative experimental approach. Remedial and Special Education, 21(6), 366–376.
27.
ZigmondN.MattaD. (2004). Value added of the special education teacher in secondary school co-taught classes. In ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (pp. 55–76). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
