Restraint and seclusion procedures employed by educators continue to be a persistent and controversial issue that may fail to provide a free, appropriate public education to students and consequently violate U.S. Section 504 and/or the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. There are 172 pending cases currently under investigation at elementary, secondary, and post-secondary schools by the Office for Civil Rights from January 1, 2014, to August 30, 2025 (47 since January 1, 2024). To illustrate the nature of these settlements, a recent representative settlement from South Carolina will be discussed, given the large number of incidents without any action taken by the district. It is crucial that school districts review and update their policies and procedures related to restraint and seclusion to ensure compliance. Themes of recent decisions/settlements are highlighted, and resources for improved practice are provided.
CarlsonA.KatsiyannisA.RyanJ. (2021). Seclusion and restraint of students with disabilities: A recent circuit court case law overview. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 5(3), 290–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-021-00205-x
3.
Center on PBIS. (2024). Supporting and responding to student’s social, emotional, and behavioral needs: Evidence-based practices for educators (Version 2). Center on PBIS, University of Oregon. www.pbis.org
4.
Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders. (2020). CCBD’s position summary on the use of physical restraint procedures in educational settings. Behavior Disorders, 46, 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742920933580
5.
FrangosE. (2022). Resolution Agreement: Horry County (SC) School District, Case No. 11-19-5002.
6.
GageN. A.PicoD. L.EvanovichL. (2022). National trends and school-level predictors of restraint and seclusion for students with disabilities. Exceptionality, 30(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1727327
7.
GagnonD. J.MattinglyM. J.ConnellyV. J. (2017). The restraint and seclusion of students with a disability: Examining trends in U.S. school districts and their policy implications. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 28(2), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207317710697
8.
GravesK. A. (2024). Restraint and seclusion: A review of practices and policy. Intervention in School and Clinic, 59(5), 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512231179099
9.
HodgkissB.HardingE. (2022). Reducing physical restraint in educational settings: A systematic literature review. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 23, 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12598
10.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
11.
KatsiyannisA.CountsJ.AdamsS.EnnisP. R. (2019). Excessive force and students with disabilities: Legal and practice considerations. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28, 885–893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01327-6
12.
KatsiyannisA.GageN. A.RapaL. J.MacSuga-GageA. S. (2020). Exploring the disproportionate use of restraint and seclusion among students with disabilities, boys, and students of color. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 4(3), 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-020-00160-z
KernL.GeorgeH. P.EvanovichL. L.HodnettJ. M.FreemanJ. (2024). A review of U.S. policy guidance and legislation on restraint and seclusion in schools: Considerations for improvement. Exceptional Children, 90(4), 382–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029241247032
15.
MartelC.CavanaughB. (2016). Preventing and responding to student escalation: Combining de-escalation strategies and function-based support. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, Winter, 2016, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.293
SugaiG.SimonsenB. (2012). Positive behavioral interventions and supports: History, defining features, and misconceptions. Center on PBIS, University of Oregon. www.pbis.org
U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights. (2024). Pending cases currently under investigation at elementary-secondary and post-secondary schools. https://ocrcas.ed.gov/open-investigations
22.
U. S. Government Accountability Office. (2009). Seclusions and restraints: Selected cases of death and abuse at public and private schools and treatment Centers (GAO-09-719T). https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-09-719t.pdf
23.
WhitakerA.LosenD. J. (2019). The striking outlier: The persistent, painful and problematic practice of corporal punishment in schools. UCLA: The Civil Rights Project / Proyecto Derechos Civiles. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9d19p8wt
