Experiential organizations often adopt quantitative course evaluation, as this provides them with numbers to justify prescribed educational outcomes to funding bodies. However, it has been argued that qualitative methods better suit the personal nature of the experiential learning process, so that epistemological understanding follows pedagogical philosophy (Allison & Pomeroy, 2000). This article highlights the learning of participants at Outward Bound New Zealand. A mixed method approach was chosen including quantitative and qualitative data collection, pre and post course. Participants (157) from four different courses were surveyed by questionnaire, with a response rate of 82% for the first to last day responses, and 30% for the 12-week post-course follow-up. The quantitative findings were consistent with the medium change of previous outdoor program effect size research for 20+ day courses (Hattie, Marsh, Neill, & Richards, 1997). However, the qualitative responses encapsulated the value and “real” meaning of these personal experiences.
AllisonP.PomeroyE. (2000). How shall we “know”? Epistemological concerns in research in experiential education. Journal of Experiential Education, 23(2), 91–98.
2.
BarrettJ.GreenawayR. (1995). Why adventure?Coventry, England: Foundation for Outdoor Adventure.
3.
BurnardP. (1991). Experiential learning in action. Aldershot, Hants, England: Avebury.
4.
CasonD.GillisH. L. (1994). A meta-analysis of outdoor adventure programming with adolescents. Journal of Experiential Education, 17(1), 40–47.
5.
CresswellJ. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
DeweyJ. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier.
9.
DupuisP. R. (1994). HyperRESEARCH (Version 1.56). Randolph, MA: ResearchWare.
10.
EwertA. W.SibthorpJ. (2000). Multivariate analysis in experiential education: Exploring the possibilities. Journal of Experiential Education, 23(2), 108–117.
11.
GassM. A. (1993). Foundations of adventure therapy. In GassM. A. (Ed.), Adventure therapy: Therapeutic applications of adventure programming (pp. 3–12). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
12.
GreenawayR. (1995). Powerful learning experiences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, England.
13.
HansT. A. (2000). A meta-analysis of the effects of adventure programming on locus of control. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 30(1), 33–60.
14.
HattieJ. A.MarshH. W.NeillJ. T.RichardsG. E. (1997). Adventure education and Outward Bound: Out-of-class experiences that have a lasting effect. Review of Educational Research, 67, 43–87.
15.
HedgesL. V.OlkinI. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic.
16.
HopkinsD.PutnamR. (1993). Personal growth through adventure. London: David Fulton.
17.
HovelynckJ. (2001). Beyond didactics: A reconnaissance of experiential learning. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 6(1), 4–12.
18.
HusseyJ.HusseyR. (1997). Business research. London: MacMillan Press.
19.
KolbD. G. (1991). Meaningful methods: Evaluation without the crunch. Journal of Experiential Education, 15(2), 40–44.
20.
LebermanS. I.MartinA. J. (2002). Does pushing comfort zones produce peak learning experiences?Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 7(1), 71–81.
21.
LebermanS. I.MartinA. J. (2004). Enhancing transfer of learning through post-course reflection. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 4(2), 173–184.
22.
LucknerJ. L.NadlerR. S. (1997). Processing the experience: Strategies to enhance and generalize learning (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
23.
MartinA. J.LebermanS. I.NeillJ. T. (2002). Dramaturgy as a method for experiential program design. Journal of Experiential Education, 25(2), 196–206.
24.
MartinA. J.LeggS. (2002). Investigating the inward sounds of Outward Bound. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 6(2), 27–36.
25.
McDonaldP. (2000). Issues of progress: Trends in the training of outdoor leaders. Dunedin, New Zealand: Peter McDonald.
26.
McKenzieM. (2003). Beyond “The Outward Bound Process:” Rethinking student learning. Journal of Experiential Education, 26(1), 8–23.
27.
MitchellH. A.MitchellM. J. (1988). A study of aspects of self-concept over a two-year period: Possible effects of an intervening (Unpublished research report). Nelson, New Zealand.
28.
MitraA.LankfordS. (1999). Research methods in park, recreation, and leisure services. Champaign, IL: Sagamore.
29.
NeillJ. T.MarshH. W.RichardsG. E. (2003). The life effectiveness questionnaire development and psychometrics. Sydney, Australia: Sydney University of Western Sydney.
PhippsM. L.ClaxtonD. B. (1997). An investigation into instructor effectiveness. Journal of Experiential Education, 20(1), 40–46.
32.
PriestS. J.GassM. A. (1997). Effective leadership in adventure programming. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
33.
RichardsA. (1994). From exposure to engagement or awareness to action. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Leadership, 11(2), 6–8.
34.
RogersC. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy. London: Constable.
35.
SchoelJ.ProutyD.RadcliffeP. (1988). Islands of healing: A guide to adventure-based counseling. Hamilton, MA: Project Adventure.
36.
SengJ. S. (1998). Praxis as a conceptual framework for participatory research in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 20(4), 37–48.
37.
SibthorpJ. (2003). An empirical look at Walsh and Golins' adventure education process model: Relationships between antecedent factors, perceptions of characteristics of an adventure education experience, and changes in self-efficacy. Journal of Leisure Research, 35(1), 80–106.
38.
StetsonC. P. (1997). The importance of including reference to the promotion of the ethos of Kurt Hahn in the preamble of the new international Outward Bound constitution. Southport, CT: The U.S. Fund for Leadership Training in South Africa.
39.
WalshV.GolinsG. (1976). The exploration of the Outward Bound Process. Denver, CO: Outward Bound Publications.
40.
YinR. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed., Vol. 5). London: Sage.
