This article offers a critical analysis of Elisabeth Kübler-Ross and David Kessler’s On Grief and Grieving: Finding the Meaning of Grief Through the Five Stages of Loss. The goal is to delineate the strengths and limitations of the book’s ostensible framework. Although the five stages of grief are described in Chapter 1, they play little role thereafter. Further, readers are told these stages are neither universal nor linear. Consequently, it would be desirable to stop staging persons who are coping with loss or at least be extremely cautious in using this stage-based model in appreciating their unique journeys.
BonannoG. A. (2004) Loss, trauma and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events?American Psychologist59: 20–28.
2.
BonannoG. A. (2009) The other side of sadness: What the new science of bereavement tells us about life after loss, New York, NY: Basic Books.
3.
CorrC. A. (1992) A task-based approach to coping with dying. OMEGA—Journal of Death and Dying24: 81–94.
4.
CorrC. A. (1993) Coping with dying: Lessons that we should and should not learn from the work of Elisabeth Kübler-Ross. Death Studies17: 69–83.
5.
CorrC. A. (2011) Strengths and limitations of the stage theory proposed by Elisabeth Kübler-Ross. In: DokaK. J.TucciA. S. (eds) Beyond Kübler-Ross: New perspectives on dying, death, and grief, Washington, DC: Hospice Foundation of America, pp. 3–16.
6.
DokaK. J. (1995) Coping with life-threatening illness: A task-based approach. OMEGA—Journal of Death & Dying32: 111–122.
7.
DokaK. J. (2007) Challenging the paradigm: New understandings of grief. In: DokaK. J. (ed.) Living with grief: Before and after the death, Washington, DC: Hospice Foundation of America, pp. 87–102.
8.
DokaK. J. (2009) Counseling individuals with life-threatening illness, New York, NY: Springer Publishing.
9.
DokaK. J. (2011) Task models & the dying process. In: DokaK. J.TucciA. S. (eds) Beyond Kübler-Ross: New perspectives on death, dying and grief, Washington, DC: Hospice Foundation of America, pp. 31–42.
10.
DokaK. J.MartinT. L. (2010) Grieving beyond gender: Understanding the ways men and women mourn, Rev. ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
Downe-WamboltB.TamlynD. (1997) An international survey of death education trends in faculties of nursing and medicine. Death Studies21: 177–188.
12.
Friedman, R., & James, J. W. (2008). The myth of the stages of dying, death and grief. Skeptic, 14(2). Retrieved from www.skeptic.com.
13.
Fuller, S. L. (2007). How to survive your grief when someone has died. Retrieved from www.SurviveYourGrief.com (Reprint Ed., 2008, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, an Amazon.com Company).
14.
GormanE. (2011) Adaptation, resilience, and growth after loss. In: HarrisD. L. (ed.) Counting our losses: Reflecting on change, loss, and transition in everyday life, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 195–208.
15.
KastenbaumR. (2012) Death, society, and human experience, 11th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
16.
KonigsbergR. D. (2011) The truth about grief: The myth of its five stages and the new science of loss, New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
17.
Kübler-RossE. (1969) On death and dying, New York, NY: Macmillan.
18.
Kübler-RossE.KesslerD. (2000) Life lessons: Two experts on death and dying teach us about the mysteries of life and living, New York, NY: Scribner.
19.
Kübler-RossE.KesslerD. (2005) On grief and grieving: Finding the meaning of grief through the five stages of loss, New York, NY: Scribner.
20.
MaciejewskiP.ZhangB.BlockS.PrigersonH. G. (2007) An empirical examination of the stage theory of grief. Journal of the American Medical Association297: 716–723.
21.
MetzgerA. M. (1979) A Q-methodological study of the Kübler-Ross stage theory. OMEGA—Journal of Death and Dying10: 291–302.
22.
NeimeyerR. A. (1998) Lessons of loss: A guide to coping, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
23.
NeimeyerR. A. (2000) Searching for the meaning of meaning: Grief therapy and the process of reconstruction. Death Studies24: 541–558.
24.
Neimeyer, R. A. (Ed.). (2001). Meaning reconstruction and the experience of loss. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25.
NeimeyerR. A. (2011) From stage follower to stage manager: Contemporary directions in bereavement care. In: DokaK. J.TucciA. S. (eds) Beyond Kübler-Ross: New perspectives on dying, death, and grief, Washington, DC: Hospice Foundation of America, pp. 131–152.
26.
RandoT. A. (1993) Treatment of complicated mourning, Champaign, IL: Research Press.
27.
RosenthalT. (1973) How could I not be among you?, New York, NY: George Braziller.
28.
RubinS. S. (1999) The two-track model of bereavement: Overview, retrospect, and prospect. Death Studies23: 681–714.
29.
RynearsonE. K. (2006) Violent death: Resilience and intervention beyond the crisis, New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
30.
SchulzR.AdermanD. (1974) Clinical research and the stages of dying. OMEGA—Journal of Death and Dying5: 137–144.
31.
StroebeM.SchutH. (1999) The dual process model of coping with bereavement: Rationale and description. Death Studies23: 197–224.
32.
TatelbaumJ. (1980) The courage to grieve, New York, NY: Lippincott & Crowell.
33.
TedeschiR. G.CalhounL. G. (1995) Trauma and transformation: Growing in the aftermath of suffering, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
TedeschiR. G.CalhounL. G. (2007) Grief as a transformative struggle. In: DokaK. J. (ed.) Living with grief: Before and after the death, Washington, DC: Hospice Foundation of America, pp. 107–121.
35.
WeizmanS. G. (1985) About mourning: Support and guidance for the bereaved, New York, NY: Human Sciences Press.
36.
WestbergG. (1971) Good grief, Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.
37.
WordenJ. W. (2009) Grief counseling and grief therapy: A handbook for mental health practitioners, 4th ed. New York: Springer Publishing.
