AlvarezS. A.BarneyJ. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1-2), 11–26.
AmabileT. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, September–October, 77–87.
6.
AndriopoulosC.GotsiM.LewisM. W.IngramA. E. (2018). Turning the sword: How NPD Teams cope with front-end tensions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(3), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12423
7.
AndriopoulosC.LewisM. W. (2009). Exploitation–exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717.
BapujiH.BakkerF. G. A.de, BrownJ. A.HigginsC.RehbeinK.SpicerA. (2020). Business and Society Research in Times of the Corona Crisis. Business & Society, 59(6), 1067–1078. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320921172
BednarekR.ParoutisS.SillinceJ. (2017). Transcendence through rhetorical practices: Responding to paradox in the science sector. Organization Studies, 38(1), 77–101.
12.
BengtssonM.KockS. (2000). “Coopetition” in business networks: To cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(5), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0019-8501(99)00067-x
13.
BennerM.TushmanM. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2003.9416096
14.
BertiM.SimpsonA. (2019). The dark side of organizational paradoxes: The dynamics of disempowerment. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0208
15.
BirdB. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intention. Academy of Management Review, i13(3), 442–453.
BurtR. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.
19.
CardonM. S.ZietsmaC.SaparitoP.MatherneB. P.DavisC. (2005). A tale of passion: New insights into entrepreneurship from a parenthood metaphor. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 23–45.
20.
ChenM. J. (2008). Reconceptualizing the competition—Cooperation relationship: A transparadox perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(4), 288–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492607312577
21.
DasT. K.TengB.-S. (2000). Instabilities of strategic alliances: An internal tensions perspective. Organization Science, 11(1), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.1.77.12570
22.
DelmestriG.GreenwoodR. (2016). “From a Cinderella into a queen:” Radical status recategorization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(4), 507–550.
23.
DeutschM. (2006). Cooperation and competition. In DeutschM.ColemanP.MarcusE. (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 23–42). Jossey-Bass.
24.
DweckC. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.
25.
e CunhaM. P. (2004). Organizational time: A dialectical view. Organization, 11(2), 271–296.
26.
EdmondsonA. C. (2018). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation and growth. John Wiley & Sons.
FeldmanM. S. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11(6), 611–629.
32.
GereffiG. (2020). What does the COVID-19 pandemic teach us about global value chains? The case of medical supplies. Journal of International Business Policy, 3(3), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-020-00062-w
33.
GereffiG.HumphreyJ.SturgeonT. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104.
34.
GibsonC.BirkinshawJ. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 200–226.
HahnT.KnightE. (2019). The ontology of organizational Paradox: A quantum approach. Academy of Management Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0408
39.
HaimerlA. (2020, May25). It’s great timing for a start-up. The New York Times.
40.
HamelG. (1991). Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S1), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120908
41.
HampelC. E.TraceyP.WeberK. (2020). The art of the pivot: How new ventures manage identification relationships with stakeholders as they change direction. Academy of Management Journal, 63(2), 440–471.
42.
HoffmannW.LavieD.ReuerJ. J.ShipilovA. (2018). The interplay of competition and cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 39(12). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2965
43.
HuqJ.ReayT.ChreimS. (2017). Protecting the paradox of interprofessional collaboration. Organization Studies, 38(3–4), 513–538.
44.
IsaacsonW. (2011). Steve jobs. Simon & Schuster.
45.
JanssenO.Van YperenN. W. (2004). Employees’ goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 368–384.
46.
JarzabkowskiP.LêJ. (2017). We have to do this and that? You must be joking: Constructing and responding to paradox through humor. Organization Studies, 38(3–4), 433–462.
47.
JarzabkowskiP.LêJ. K.VandeVenA. H. (2013). Responding to competing strategic demands: How organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve. Strategic Organization, 11(3), 245–280.
48.
JayJ. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0772
49.
KhaireM. (2019). Entrepreneurship by design: The construction of meanings and markets for cultural craft goods. Innovation, 21(1), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2018.1530566
50.
KlarnerP.RaischS. (2013). Move to the beat—Rhythms of change and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 160–184.
51.
KnightE.ParoutisS. (2017). Becoming salient: The TMT leader’s role in shaping the interpretive context of paradoxical tensions. Organization Studies, 38(3-4), 403–432.
52.
KunischS.BartunekJ. M.MuellerJ.HuyQ. N. (2017). Time in strategic change research. Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), 1005–1064.
53.
LavertyK. J. (1996). Economic “short-termism:” The debate, the unresolved issues, and the implications for management practice and research. Academy of Management Review, 21(3), 825–860.
LevinthalD. A.MarchJ. G. (1981). A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2, 307–333.
56.
LevittB.MarchJ. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340.
57.
LewisM. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776.
58.
LewisM. W.SmithW. K. (2014). Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective: Sharpening the focus and widening the scope. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), 127–149. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0021886314522322
LizardoO. (2014). Omnivorousness as the bridging of cultural holes: A measurement strategy. Theory and Society, 43(3–4), 395–419.
61.
LounsburyM.GlynnM. A. (2019). Cultural entrepreneurship: A new agenda for the study of entrepreneurial processes and possibilities. Cambridge University Press.
62.
LundmarkE.KrzeminskaA.ShepherdD. A. (2019). Images of entrepreneurship: Exploring root metaphors and expanding upon them. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1), 138–170.
63.
LundmarkE.WesteliusA. (2014). Entrepreneurship as elixir and mutagen. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(3), 575–600.
64.
LüscherL. S.LewisM. W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.31767217
65.
MarchJ. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.
66.
MarginsonD.McAulayL. (2008). Exploring the debate on short-termism: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 273–292.
67.
MartinsonsM. G. (1993). Outsourcing information systems: A strategic partnership with risks. Long Range Planning, 26(3), 18–25.
68.
McMullenJ. S.ShepherdD. A. (2006). Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 132–152.
Miron-SpektorE.GinoF.ArgoteL. (2011). Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(2), 229–240.
72.
Miron-SpektorE.IngramA.KellerJ.SmithW. K.LewisM. W. (2018). Microfoundations of organizational paradox: The problem is how we think about the problem. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 26–45.
73.
NelsonR. R.WinterS. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Nicholls-NixonC. L.CooperA. C.WooC. Y. (2000). Strategic experimentation: Understanding change and performance in new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5–6), 493–521.
PerlowL.OkhuysenG.RepenningN. (2002). The speed trap: Exploring the relationship between decision making and temporal context. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 931–955.
84.
PooleM. S.van de VenA. H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 562–578. https://doi.org/10.2307/258559
85.
PradiesC.TunarosaA.LewisM. W. (2020). From vicious to virtuous paradox dynamics: The social-symbolic work of supporting actors. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0170840620907200
86.
PutnamL. L.FairhurstG. T.BanghartS. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 65–171.
87.
RaischS.BirkinshawJ. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34, 375–409. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0149206308316058
88.
RaischS.BirkinshawJ.ProbstG.TushmanM. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685–695.
89.
Raza-UllahT. (2020). Experiencing the paradox of coopetition: A moderated mediation framework explaining the paradoxical tension–performance relationship. Long Range Planning, 53(1), 101863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.003
90.
Raza-UllahT.BengtssonM.KockS. (2014). The coopetition paradox and tension in coopetition at multiple levels. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.11.001
91.
ReineckeJ.AnsariS. (2015). When times collide: Temporal brokerage at the intersection of markets and development. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 618–648.
92.
RothenbergA. (1979). The emerging goddess: The creative process in art, science, and other fields. University of Chicago Press.
93.
SchadJ.LewisM. W.RaischS.SmithW. K. (2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 5–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2016.1162422
94.
SchererA. G.PalazzoG. (2007). Towards a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.
95.
SchultzM.HernesT. (2013). A temporal perspective on organizational identity. Organization Science, 24(1), 1–21.
SeelosC.MairJ.BattilanaJ.DacinM. T. (2011). The embeddedness of social entrepreneurship: Understanding variation across local communities. In MarquisC.LounsburyM.GreenwoodR. (Eds.), Communities and organizations (pp. 333–363). Emerald Group.
98.
SeoM.PutnamL. L.BartunekJ. M. (2004). Dualities and tensions of planned organizational change. In PooleM. S.Van de VenA. H. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational change and innovation (pp. 73–107). Oxford University Press.
99.
SheepM. L.FairhurstG. T.KhazanchiS. (2017). Knots in the discourse of innovation: Investigating multiple tensions in a reacquired spin-off. Organization Studies, 38(3–4), 463–488.
100.
SinkulaJ. M.BakerW.NoordewierT. G. (1997). A framework for market-based organizational learning: Linking values, knowledge and behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(Fall), 305–318.
101.
SlawinskiN.BansalP. (2015). Short on time: Intertemporal tensions in business sustainability. Organization Science, 26(2), 531–549.
102.
SlawinskiN.BansalP. (2017). The paradoxes of time in organizations. In SmithW. K.LewisM. W.JarzabkowskiP.LangleyA. A. (Eds.) The Oxford handbook of organizational paradox (pp. 373–392). Oxford University Press.
103.
SlawinskiN.PinkseJ.BuschT.BanerjeeB. (2017). The role of short-termism and uncertainty avoidance in organizational inaction on climate change: A multi-level framework. Business & Society, 56(2), 253–282.
104.
SmithW. K. (2014). Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1592–1623.
105.
SmithW. K.BesharovM. L. (2019). Bowing before dual gods: How structured flexibility sustains organizational hybridity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(1), 1–44.
106.
SmithW. K.LewisM. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0223
107.
SmithW. K.LewisM. W.TushmanM. L. (2011). Organizational ambidexterity: Organization design and senior leadership to enable strategic paradox. In CameronK.SpreitzerG. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 798–810). Oxford University Press.
108.
SmithW. K.TraceyP. (2016). Institutional complexity and paradox theory: Complementarities of competing demands. Strategic Organization, 14(4), 455–466.
109.
StadtlerL. (2018). Tightrope walking: Navigating competition in multi-company cross-sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3579-2
StewartT. A.RamanA. P. (2007). Lessons from Toyota’s long drive. Harvard Business Review, 85(7/8), 74–83.
114.
StrangD.MeyerJ. W. (1993). Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22(4) 487–511.
115.
SutantoJ.PalmeE.TanC. H.PhangC. W. (2013). Addressing the personalization-privacy paradox: An empirical assessment from a field experiment on smartphone users. MIS Quarterly, 37(4), 1141–1164.
116.
SundaramurthyC.LewisM. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 397–415.
117.
TeeceD. J. (1981). The multinational enterprise: Market failure and market power considerations. Sloan Management Review, 22(3), 3–17.
118.
TsoukasH.e CunhaM. P. (2017). On organizational circularity. In SmithW. K.LewisM.JarzabkowskiP.LangleyA. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational paradox: Approaches to plurality, tensions, and contradictions (pp. 393–412). Oxford University Press.
119.
VegtG.van der, & BundersonS. (2005). Learning and performance in multidiscipinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 532–547.
120.
VerbekeA. (2020). Will the COVID-19 pandemic really change the governance of global value chains?British Journal of Management, 31(3), 444–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12422
121.
VinceR.BroussineM. (1996). Paradox, defense and attachment: Accessing and working with emotions and relations underlying organizational change. Organization Studies, 17(1), 1–21.
XuH.LuoX. R.CarrollJ. M.RossonM. B. (2011). The personalization privacy paradox: An exploratory study of decision making process for location-aware marketing. Decision Support Systems, 51(1), 42–52.