Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the reasons that two matriculated students had for enrollment into either an online or a traditional master of music in music education (MME) degree program. Research questions were the following: (a) What are the reasons each student gave for matriculating into either an online or a traditional MME program? (b) What are these students’ perceptions of both types of MME programs? How did those perceptions influence their decisions to matriculate into a respective program, if at all? Reasons for matriculating into a respective program included professional and financial obligations, creating relationships with faculty, perceived flexibility of the online program, and development of musician identity and musicianship. Implications include employing the hybrid course format to create a balance of both types of learning environments. Suggestions for future research include investigating the value that students find in an applied lesson and/or ensemble participation component of an MME program.

Keywords

online academic-year traditional master of music in music education degree graduate studies distance education distance learning master’s degree

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

DeFleur

M. H.

(2006). The acceptability of online degrees earned as a credential for obtaining employment. Communication Education, 55, 32-45. doi:10.1080/03634520500343376

Archambault

Crippen

(2009). K-12 distance educators at work: Who’s teaching online across the United States. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41, 363-391.

Artino

A. R.

(2007). Online military training: Using a social cognitive view of motivation and self-regulation to understand students’ satisfaction, perceived learning, and choice. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8, 191-202.

Braun

(2008). Making a choice: The perceptions and attitudes of online graduate students. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16, 63-92.

Butler

R. E.

(2013). An exploratory study of online teaching in for-profit undergraduate education degree programs (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3570243)

Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Ely

(1991). Doing qualitative research: Circles within circles. London, England: Falmer Press.

Fung

C. V.

(2004). Perception of the need for introducing flexible learning in graduate studies in music education: A case study. College Music Symposium, 44, 107-120.

Groulx

T. J.

Hernly

(2010). Online master’s degrees in music education: The growing pains of a tool to reach a larger community. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 28(2), 60-70. doi:10.1177/8755123310361765

10.

Hebert

(2007). Five challenges and solutions in online music teacher education. Research & Issues in Music Education, 5, 1-10.

11.

Hoyle

(2014, March 9). Distance learning on the Net. Retrieved from http://www.hoyle.com/distance/define.htm

12.

Kos

R. P.

Goodrich

(2012). Music teachers’ professional growth: Experiences of graduates from an online graduate degree program. Visions of Research in Music Education, 22. Retrieved from http://www-usr.rider.edu/~vrme/v22n1/visions/Kos_Goodrich_Online_Graduate_Degree_Program.pdf

13.

Lane

L. M.

(2013). An open, online class to prepare faculty to teach online. Journal of Educators Online, 10(1). Retrieved from http://thejeo.com/Archives/Volume10Number1/Lane.pdf

14.

LeBlanc

(1991). Planning your summer graduate work. Music Educators Journal, 77(7), 28-30. doi:10.2307/3398168

15.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

16.

Lorenzetti

J. P.

(2004). For quality and cost effectiveness, build a hybrid program. Distance Education Report, 8(21), 1-2.

17.

Mansour

B. E.

Mupinga

D. M.

(2007). Students’ positive and negative experiences in hybrid and online classes. College Student Journal, 41, 242-248.

18.

Merriam

S. B.

(1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

19.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

(1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

20.

Morgan

D. L.

(1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

21.

Patton

M. Q.

(2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

22.

Ruthmann

S. A.

Hebert

D. G.

(2012). Music learning and new media in virtual and online environments. In McPherson

G. E.

Welch

G. F.

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music education (Vol. 2, pp. 567-583). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

23.

Sherbon

J. W.

Kish

D. L.

(2005). Distance learning and the music teacher. Music Educators Journal, 92(2), 36-41. doi:10.2307/3400195

24.

Stake

R. E.

(1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

25.

Louis

St. . (2012, January 10). With enough bandwidth, many join the band. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/11/us/music-lessons-on-webcams-grow-in-popularity.html?pagewanted=all

26.

van Manen

. (1997). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (2nd ed.). London, Ontario: Althouse Press.

27.

Walls

K. C.

(2008). Distance learning in graduate music teacher education: Promoting professional development and satisfaction of music teachers. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 18, 55-66. doi:10.1177/1057083708323137