We identify the creative requirement of a job as a neglected predictor of employee creativity and propose that it may account for relationships between traditional work factors and creativity. As such, it may represent a more effective means of increasing creativity than changes in job design. Using structural equation modeling, we tested this model against four competing models using a sample of 1,083 health service employees. Creative requirement was found to account for much of the variance by fully mediating the effects of supportive leadership and role requirements and partially mediating those of empowerment and time demands. We conclude that creative requirement is an important proximal determinant of employee creativity and a potentially significant intervention.
Aiken, M., Bacharach, S. B., & French, J. L. (1980). Organizational structure, work process and proposal making in administrative bureaucracies. Academy of Management Journal, 23(4), 631-652.
2.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
3.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
4.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
5.
Andrews, F. M., & Farris, G. F. (1972). Time pressure and performance of scientists and engineers: A five-year panel study. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8, 185-200.
6.
Angle, H. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Suggestions for managing the innovation journey. In A. H. Van de Ven, H. L. Angle, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Research on the management of innovation: The Minnesota Studies (pp. 663-698). New York: Harper & Row.
7.
Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., Waterson, P., & Harrington, E. (2000). Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 265-286.
8.
Bailyn, L. (1985). Autonomy in the industrial R&D laboratory. Human Resource Management, 24, 129-146.
9.
Burkhardt, M. E., & Brass, D. J. (1990). Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 104-127.
10.
Caplan, R. D., Cobb, S., French, J. R. P. Jr., Harrison, R. U., & Pinneau, S. R. Jr. (1975). Job demands and worker health: Main effects and occupational differences. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
11.
Caulkin, S. (1993, May8). British firms resurrected by courtesy of Japan. The Guardian, p.24.
12.
Ciotta, P. (1987). The anatomy of a creative corporate culture. Journal of Creative Behavior, 21(2), 145-152.
13.
Clegg, C. W., Unsworth, K. L., Epitropaki, O., & Parker, G. (in press). Implicating trust in the innovation process. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology.
14.
Cummings, A., & Oldham, G. R. (1997). Enhancing creativity: Managing work contexts for the high potential employee. California Management Review, 40(1), 22-37.
15.
Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 51-59.
16.
Greenberg, E. (1992). Creativity, autonomy, and evaluation of creative work: Artistic workers in organizations. Journal of Creative Behavior, 26(2), 75-80.
17.
Guastello, S. J. (1995). Facilitiative style, individual innovation and emergent leadership in problem solving groups. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29(4), 225-268.
18.
Haynes, C. E., Wall, T. D., Bolden, R. I., & Rick, J. E. (1999). Measures of perceived work characteristics for health service research: Test of a measurement model and normative data. British Journal of Health Psychology, 4, 257-275.
19.
Hill, F. M. (1998). Trying to catch a cloud: In pursuit of organisational climate. Unpublished doctorial dissertation. Institute of Work Psychology, University of Sheffield, England.
20.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Yang, F. (1996). Nonlinear structural equation models: The Kenny-Judd model with interaction effects. In C. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues & techniques. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21.
Kanter, R. M. (1983). The change masters. New York: Simon and Schuster.
22.
Lawthom, R., Patterson, M., West, M. A., & Maitlis, S. (1998). Development of the Organisational Climate Inventory—a new measure of organisational climate (Institute of Work Psychology Memo No. 109). Sheffield, England: Institute of Work Psychology, University of Sheffield.
23.
Locke, E. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.
24.
Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L., & Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125-152.
25.
Mackinnon, D. W. (1962). The personality correlates of creativity: A study of American architects. In G. S. Nielsen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Applied Psychology (11-39). Copenhagen, Denmark: Munksgaard.
26.
Mohamed, M. Z., & Rickards, T. (1996). Assessing and comparing the innovativeness and creative climate of firms. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 12(2), 109-121.
27.
Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C.1999. Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate work-place change. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 403-419.
28.
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.
29.
Owens, W. A. (1969). Cognitive, noncognitive and environment correlates of mechanical ingenuity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53(3), 199-208.
30.
Pelz, D. C. (1967). Creative tensions in the research and development climate. Science, 157, 160-165.
31.
Pelz, D. C., & Andrews, F. M. (1966). Autonomy, coordination, and stimulation in relation to scientific achievement. Behavioral Science, 11(2), 89-97.
32.
Redmond, M. R., Mumford, M. D., & Teach, R. (1993). Putting creativity to work: Effects of leader behavior on subordinate creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55(1), 120-151.
33.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
34.
Shalley, C. E. (1991). Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), 179-185.
35.
Shalley, C. E. (1995). Effects of coaction, expected evaluation and goal-setting on creativity and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 483-503.
36.
Shalley, C. E., Gilson, L. L., & Blum, T. C. (2000). Matching creativity requirements and the work environment: Effects on satisfaction and intentions to leave. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 215-223.
37.
Stone, R. J. (1998). Human resource management (3rd ed.). Brisbane, Australia: John Wiley.
38.
Taylor, J. C., & Bowers, D. G. (1972). Survey of organizations: A machine scored standardized questionnaire instrument. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.
39.
Unsworth, K. L. (2001). Unpacking creativity. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 286-297.
40.
Van de Ven, A. H., Angle, H. L., & Poole, M. S. (1989). Research on the management of innovation: The Minnesota Studies. New York: Harper & Row.
41.
Wall T. D., Bolden, R. I., Borrill C. S., Carter A. J., Golya, D. A., Hardy, G. E., et al. (1997). Minor psychiatric disorder in NHS Trust staff: Occupational and gender differences. British Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 519-523.
42.
Wall T. D., Clegg C. W., & Cordery J. L. (2002). Empowerment, performance and operational uncertainty: A theoretical integration. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 146-169.
