The objective was to quantitatively evaluate clinician characteristics associated with unwarranted practice variation, and how clinical care algorithms influence this variation. Participants (142 physicians, 53 nurse practitioners, and 9 physician assistants in family medicine, internal medicine, and cardiology) described their management of 4 clinical vignettes, first based on their own practice (unguided), then using care algorithms (guided). The authors quantitatively estimated variation in management. Cardiologists demonstrated 17% lower variation in unguided responses than generalists (fold-change 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68, 0.97]), and those who agreed that practice variation can realistically be reduced had 16% lower variation than those who did not (fold-change 0.84 [CI, 0.71, 0.99]). A 17% reduction in variation was observed for guided responses compared with baseline (unguided) responses (fold-change 0.83 [CI, 0.76, 0.90]). Differences were otherwise similar across clinician subgroups and attitudes. Unwarranted practice variation was similar across most clinician subgroups. The authors conclude that care algorithms can reduce variation in management.
CoralloANCroxfordRGoodmanDCBryanELSrivastavaDStukelTA.A systematic review of medical practice variation in OECD countries. Health Policy. 2014;114:5-14.
2.
WennbergJE.Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: implications for academic medical centres. BMJ. 2002;325:961-964.
3.
McCabeCKirchnerCZhangHDaleyJFismanDN.Guideline-concordant therapy and reduced mortality and length of stay in adults with community-acquired pneumonia: playing by the rules. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1525-1531.
4.
PatelJAhmedKGuruKA, et al. An overview of the use and implementation of checklists in surgical specialities—a systematic review. Int J Surg. 2014;12:1317-1323.
5.
van DiepenSBakalJALinMKaulPMcAlisterFAEzekowitzJA.Variation in critical care unit admission rates and outcomes for patients with acute coronary syndromes or heart failure among high- and low-volume cardiac hospitals. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4(3):e001708.
6.
CloughJDRajkumarRCrimMT, et al. Practice-level variation in outpatient cardiac care and association with outcomes. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(2):e002594.
7.
CloughJDPatelKShrankWH.Variation in specialty outpatient care patterns in the Medicare population. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31:1278-1286.
8.
YealyDMAubleTEStoneRA, et al. Effect of increasing the intensity of implementing pneumonia guidelines: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:881-894.
9.
KhanjiMYBicalhoVVvan WaardhuizenCNFerketBSPetersenSEHuninkMG.Cardiovascular risk assessment: a systematic review of guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165:713-722.
10.
ShaneyfeltTMMayo-SmithMFRothwanglJ.Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature. JAMA. 1999;281:1900-1905.
11.
FisherESWennbergDEStukelTAGottliebDJLucasFLPinderEL.The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:273-287.
12.
VeloskiJTaiSEvansASNashDB.Clinical vignette-based surveys: a tool for assessing physician practice variation. Am J Med Qual. 2005;20:151-157.
13.
PeabodyJWLuckJGlassmanP, et al. Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: a prospective validation study. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:771-780.
14.
PeabodyJWLuckJGlassmanPDresselhausTRLeeM.Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA. 2000;283:1715-1722.
15.
BaldwinLMTriversKFMatthewsB, et al. Vignette-based study of ovarian cancer screening: do U.S. physicians report adhering to evidence-based recommendations?Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:182-194.
16.
McClearyNRamsayCRFrancisJJCampbellMKAllanJ.Perceived difficulty and appropriateness of decision making by general practitioners: a systematic review of scenario studies. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:621.
17.
McKinlayJBLinkCLFreundKMMarceauLDO’DonnellABLutfeyKL.Sources of variation in physician adherence with clinical guidelines: results from a factorial experiment. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:289-296.
18.
TiemeierHde VriesWJvan het LooM, et al. Guideline adherence rates and interprofessional variation in a vignette study of depression. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:214-218.
19.
BrowneLRDudleyNCCoxSAdelgaisKM.Variation in the self-reported use of computed tomography in clearing the cervical spine of pediatric trauma patients. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011;27:361-366.
20.
JunghansCFederGTimmisAD, et al. Effect of patient-specific ratings vs conventional guidelines on investigation decisions in angina: appropriateness of referral and investigation in angina (ARIA) trial. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:195-202.
21.
DharmarajahBThaparASalemJLaneTRLeenELDaviesAH.Impact of risk scoring on decision-making in symptomatic moderate carotid atherosclerosis. Br J Surg. 2014;101:475-480.
22.
WoolfSHGrolRHutchinsonAEcclesMGrimshawJ.Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ. 1999;318:527-530.
23.
WorrallGChaulkPFreakeD.The effects of clinical practice guidelines on patient outcomes in primary care: a systematic review. CMAJ. 1997;156:1705-1712.
24.
AttridgeRTFreiCRPughMJ, et al. Health care-associated pneumonia in the intensive care unit: guideline-concordant antibiotics and outcomes. J Crit Care. 2016;36:265-271.
25.
CabanaMDRandCSPoweNR, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282:1458-1465.
26.
ArtsDLVonckenAGMedlockSAbu-HannaAvan WeertHC.Reasons for intentional guideline non-adherence: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2016;89:55-62.
27.
ShaneyfeltTMCentorRM.Reassessment of clinical practice guidelines: go gently into that good night. JAMA. 2009;301:868-869.
28.
CarlsenBGlentonCPopeC.Thou shalt versus thou shalt not: a meta-synthesis of GPs’ attitudes to clinical practice guidelines. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57:971-978.
29.
GrolRDalhuijsenJThomasSVeldCRuttenGMokkinkH.Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. BMJ. 1998;317:858-861.
30.
UrkinJAllenbogenMFrigerMVinkerSReuveniHElahayaniA.Acute pharyngitis: low adherence to guidelines highlights need for greater flexibility in managing paediatric cases. Acta Paediatr. 2013;102:1075-1080.
31.
PatelNTongLAhnCSingalAGGuptaS.Post-polypectomy guideline adherence: importance of belief in guidelines, not guideline knowledge or fear of missed cancer. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:2937-2945.
32.
ChanWVPearsonTABennettGC, et al. ACC/AHA Special report: clinical practice guideline implementation strategies: a summary of systematic reviews by the NHLBI implementation science work group: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2017;135:e122-e137.
33.
ZwolsmanSte PasEHooftLWieringa-de WaardMvan DijkN.Barriers to GPs’ use of evidence-based medicine: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62:e511-e521.
34.
HajjajFMSalekMSBasraMKFinlayAY.Non-clinical influences on clinical decision-making: a major challenge to evidence-based practice. J R Soc Med. 2010;103:178-187.
35.
CookDAPencilleLJDuprasDMLinderbaumJAPankratzVSWilkinsonJM.Practice variation and practice guidelines: attitudes of generalist and specialist physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0191943.
36.
CookDASorensenKJNishimuraRAOmmenSRLloydFJ.A comprehensive system to support physician learning at the point of care. Acad Med. 2015;90:33-39.
37.
CookDASorensenKJLinderbaumJAPencilleLJRhodesDJ. Information needs of generalists and specialists using online best-practice algorithms to answer clinical questions. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017;24:754-761.
38.
MahalanobisPC.On the generalised distance in statistics. Proc Natl Inst Sci India. 1936;2(1):49-55.
39.
RanardBLHaYPMeiselZF, et al. Crowdsourcing—harnessing the masses to advance health and medicine, a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29:187-203.
40.
CookDASherbinoJDurningSJ.Management reasoning: beyond the diagnosis. JAMA. 2018;319:2267-2268.
41.
NguyenYLPerrodeauEGuidetB, et al. Mechanical ventilation and clinical practice heterogeneity in intensive care units: a multicenter case-vignette study. Ann Intensive Care. 2014;4:2.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
