Platforms may enable offering a variety of products to the market while keeping the development cost down. Reusing design knowledge is a key concept, whether manifested as reusing parts, ideas, concepts, or technologies. This article describes processes and information technology solutions for holistically working with both technology platforms and product platforms. A platform framework was developed for managing information and to support the processes. The use of the framework is illustrated through a case study performed at a subsupplier in the aerospace industry focusing on technology development, platform-based product development, and platform configuration. A wiki system supports the technology platform, containing electronic guidelines, methods, and information about the technologies. To support the product platform, a product lifecycle management architecture is created. A turbine rear structure from a turbofan engine is used as an example, requiring several different analysis technologies to be used and coordinated when creating a variant. The solution is a product lifecycle management architecture created based on the technology platform. It integrates a product data management system, a computer-aided design tool, two computer-aided engineering tools, and a configurator.
AbramoviciM (2002) “Status and Development Trends of Product Lifecycle Management Systems”, International Conference on Integrated Product and Process Development, November 21–22, Wroclaw, Poland.
2.
BerglundFBergsjöDHögmanUKhadkeK (2008) “Platform Strategies for a Supplier in the Aircraft Engine Industry”, New York City, NY, USA.
3.
BurrHVielhaberMDeubelTWeberCHaasisS (2004) “CAx/EDM integration - Enabler for Methodical Benefits in the Design Process”, 8th International Design Conference - DESIGN 2004, May 18–21, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
4.
BuurJ (1990) “A Theoretical Approach to Mechatronics Design”, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Engineering Design, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby.
5.
CaticA (2011) “Knowledge-based Engineering in Product Development Processes - Process, IT and Knowledge Management perspectives”, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Product and Production Development, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg.
ClaessonA (2006) “A Configurable Component Framework Supporting Platform-Based Product Development”, Ph.D. Thesis, Product and Production Development, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
8.
EdholmPWahlALJohannessonHSöderbergR (2009) “Knowledge Based Configuration of Integrated Product and Process Platform”, ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference IDETC/CIE 2009, August 30–September 2, San Diego, California, USA.
9.
EdholmPJohannessonHSöderbergR (2010) “Geometry Interactions in Configurable Platform Models”, International Design Conference - DESIGN 2010, May 17–20, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
10.
ErensFJ (1996) “The Synthesis of Variety: Developing Product Families”, PhD Thesis, Enidhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
11.
GedellSMichaelisMTJohannessonH (2011) “Integrated Model For Co-Development of Products and Production Systems - A Systems Theory Approach”, The Journal of Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 19(2), pp. 139–156.
12.
GershensonJKPrasadGJZhangY (2003) “Product Modularity: Definitions and Benefits”, Journal of Engineering Design, 14(3), pp. 295–313.
13.
GrievesM (2006) “Product Lifecycle Management: Driving the Next Generation of Lean Thinking”, McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, USA.
14.
HernandezGAllenJKMistreeF (2003) “Platform Design for Customizable Products as a Problem of Access in a Geometric Space”, Engineering Optimization, 35(3), pp. 229–254.
15.
InoueMNahmYEOkawaSIshikawaH (2010) “Design Support System by Combination of 3D-CAD and CAE with Preference Set-based Design Method”, The Journal of Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 18(1), pp. 41–53.
16.
JiaoJSimpsonTWSiddiqueZ (2007) “Product Family Design and Blatform-Based Product Development: a State-of-the-Art Review”, 18, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.
17.
JollyDRNasiriyarM (2007) “Technology Platform Exploitation: Definition and Research Boundaries”, 16th International Conference on Management of Technology - IAMOT 2007, May 13–17, Miami, Florida, USA.
18.
JørgensenKA (1992) “Videnskablige arbejdsparadigmer (“Scinetific Work Paradigms”, in Danish)”, Instityte for Production, Aalborg University Center, Aalborg, Denmark.
19.
KimDJKogutB (1996) “Technological Platforms and Diversification”, 7, Organization Science.
20.
LevandowskiCEdholmPEkstedtFCarlssonJSöderbergRJohannessonH (2011) “PLM Architecture for Optimization of Geometrical Interfaces in a Product Platform”, ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference IDETC/CIE 2011, August 28–31, Washington DC, USA.
21.
MannistoTPeltonenHSoininenTSulonenR (2001) “Multiple Abstraction Levels in Modelling Product Structures”, Data & Knowledge Engineering, 36(1), pp. 55–78.
22.
McGrathME (2001) “Product Strategy for High-Technology Companies: Accelerating Your Business to Web Speed”, McGraw-Hill, New York ; London.
23.
MeerkammH (1994) “Design for X-A core area of design methodology”, Journal of Engineering Design, 5(2), p. 145.
24.
MeyerMHLehnerdAP (1997) “The Power of Product Platforms: Building Value and Cost Leadership”, Free Press, New York, New York, USA.
25.
MingXGYanJQLuWFMaDZ (2005) “Technology Solutions for Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management - Status Review and Future Trend”, The Journal of Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, Dec.
26.
NobeliusD (2002) “Managing R&D Processes - Focusing on Technology Development, Product Development, and their Interplay”, Ph.D. Thesis: 91, Operations Management and Work Organization, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
27.
PedersenR (2009) “Product Platform Modelling - Contributions to the discipline of visual product platform modelling”, Ph.D. Thesis, DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
28.
PrasadB (1996) “Concurrent Engineering Fundamentals”, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
29.
PrasadBWangFJDengJT (1997) “Towards a Computer-Supported Cooperative Environment for Concurrent Engineering”.
30.
RobertsonDUlrichK (1998) “Planning for Product Platforms”, <Go to ISI>://000074864500013. Retrived: 4 39
31.
SchachingerPJohannessonH (2000) “Computer Modelling of Design Specifications”, Journal of Engineering Design, 11(4), pp. 333–353.
32.
SchillingMASteensmaHK (2001) “The Use of Modular Organizational Forms: An Industry-Level Analysis”, Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), pp. 1149–1168.
33.
ShapiroAR (2006) “Measuring Innovation: Beyond Revenue From New Products”, Research-Technology Management, 49(6), pp. 42–51.
34.
StarkJ (2005) “Product Lifecycle Management: 21st Century Paradigm for Product Realisation”, Springer, London, UK.
35.
SvenssonDMalmströmJPikoszPMalmqvistJ (1999) “A Framework for Modelling and Analysis of Engineering Information Systems”, ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, September 12–15, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
36.
TakeishiA (2002) “Knowledge Partitioning in the Interfirm Division of Labor: The Case of Automotive Product Development”, Organization Science, 13(3), pp. 321–338.
37.
TerziSBourasADuttaDGarettiMKiritsisD (2010) “Product Lifecycle Management – from Its History to Its New Role”, International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, 4(4), pp. 360–389.
38.
van VeenEA (1991) “Modeling Product Structures by Generic Bills-Of-Material”, Ph.D. Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
39.
WheelwrightSCClarkKB (1992) “Revolutionizing Product Development : Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency, and Quality”, Free Press: New York, NY, USA.
40.
WilliamsCBAllenJKRosenDWMistreeF (2007) “Designing Platforms for Customizable Products and Processes in Markets of Non-Uniform Demand”.
41.
ZimmermanT (2008) “Implementing PLM Across Organisations”, PhD thesis, Department of Product and Production Development, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg.
