This study examines the cost effectiveness of two interventions for disruptive behavior problems: First Step Next (FSN), a school-based intervention, and a multicomponent intervention that combined FSN with a home-based intervention, homeBase (hB). Analyses were based on findings from a large-scale comparative efficacy trial in the United States (Frey et al., 2022). Intervention costs were estimated using an activities-based ingredients method (Levin & McEwan, 2001). For each disruptive behavior examined (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [ADHD], conduct disorder [CD], and comorbid ADHD and CD), we defined intervention response as movement from the clinical range into the borderline or normative range or from the borderline range into the normative range at post-intervention. Comparative cost-effectiveness analyses involved calculating incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), which showed that the combined intervention was always more cost effective. Improvement in comorbid ADHD and CD was the costliest to achieve, followed by CD, and then ADHD. Sensitivity analyses showed that FSN + hB had a high probability of being cost effective across a range of estimates, indicating stakeholder willingness to pay to reduce disruptive behavior problems. This study expands the literature by estimating the costs of implementing a school-based intervention alone or alongside a home-based intervention with elementary students and comparing their cost effectiveness.
AchenbachT. M.RescorlaL. A. (2001). Manual for ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families.
2.
American Institutes for Research, Cost Analysis Standards Project. (2021). Standards for the economic evaluation of educational and social programs. Author.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Author.
4.
BrieschA. M.FergusonT. D.VolpeR. J.BrieschJ. M. (2012). Examining teachers’ perceptions of social-emotional and behavioral referral concerns. Remedial and Special Education, 34(4), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512464579
5.
CrowleyD. M.DodgeK. A.BarnettW. S.CorsoP.DuffyS.GrahamP.GreenbergM. T.HaskinsR.HillL.JonesD. E.KarolyL.KuklinskiM. R.PlotnickR. (2018). Standards of evidence for conducting and reporting economic evaluations in prevention science. Prevention Science, 19(3), 366–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0858-1
6.
FeilE. G.FreyA.WalkerH. M.SmallJ. W.SeeleyJ. R.GollyA.FornessS. R. (2014). The efficacy of a home-school intervention for preschoolers with challenging behaviors: A randomized controlled trial of Preschool First Step to Success. Journal of Early Intervention, 36(3), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815114566090
7.
FeilE. G.WalkerH. M.FreyA. J.SeeleyJ.SmallJ. W.GollyA.LeeJ.FornessS. R. (2020). Efficacy validation of the Revised First Step Program: A randomized controlled trial. Exceptional Children, 87(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402920924848
8.
FosterE. M.JonesD. E. (2005). The high costs of aggression: Public expenditures resulting from conduct disorder. American Journal of Public Health, 95(10), 1767–1772. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.061424
9.
FosterE. M.OlchowskiA. E.Webster-StrattonC. H. (2007). Is stacking intervention components cost-effective? An analysis of the Incredible Years program. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 46(11), 1414–1424. https://doi.org/10.1097/chi.0b013e3181514c8a
10.
FrenchA. N.YatesB. T.FowlesT. R. (2018). Cost-effectiveness of parent-child interaction therapy in clinics versus homes: Client, provider, administrator, and overall perspectives. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(10), 3329–3344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1159-4
11.
FreyA. J.KuklinskiM. R.BillsK.SmallJ. W.FornessS. R.WalkerH. M.FeilE. G.SeeleyJ. R. (2019). Comprehensive cost analysis of First Step Next for preschoolers with disruptive behavior disorder: Using real-world intervention data to estimate costs at scale. Prevention Science, 20(8), 1219–1232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-01035-z
12.
FreyA. J.LeeJ.SmallJ. W.WalkerH. M.SeeleyJ. R. (2017). Motivational Interviewing Training and Assessment System (MITAS) for school-based applications. Report on Emotional & Behavioral Disorders in Youth, 17(4), 86–92.
13.
FreyA. J.SmallJ. W.LeeJ.WalkerH. M.SeeleyJ. R.FeilE. G.GollyA. (2015). Expanding the range of the First Step to Success intervention: Tertiary-level support for children, teachers, and families. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 30, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.05.002
14.
FreyA. J.SmallJ. W.SeeleyJ. R.WalkerH. M.FeilE. G.LeeJ.Cohen LissmanD.CrosbyS.FornessS. R. (2022). First Step Next and homeBase: A comparative efficacy study of children with disruptive behavior. Exceptional Children, 88(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029211062588
HollandsF. M.BowdenA. B.BelfieldC.LevinH. M.ChengH.ShandR.PanY.Hanisch-CerdaB. (2014). Cost-effectiveness analysis in practice: Interventions to improve high school completion. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(3), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713511850
17.
HollandsF. M.KiefferM. J.ShandR.PanY.ChengH.LevinH. M. (2016). Cost-effectiveness analysis of early reading programs: A demonstration with recommendations for future research. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(1), 30–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2015.1055639
18.
HunterL. J.DiPernaJ. C.HartS. C.CrowleyM. (2018). At what cost? Examining the cost effectiveness of a universal social–emotional learning program. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(1), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000232
19.
JensenP. S.GarciaJ. A.GliedS.CroweM.FosterM.SchlanderM.HinshawS.VitielloB.ArnoldL. E.ElliottG.HechtmanL.NewcornJ. H.PelhamW. E.SwansonJ.WellsK. (2005). Cost-effectiveness of ADHD treatments: Findings from the Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With ADHD. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(9), 1628–1636. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.9.1628
20.
JonesD. E.FosterE. M., & Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2009). Service use patterns for adolescents with ADHD and comorbid conduct disorder. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 36(4), 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-008-9133-3
21.
KaminskiJ. W.ClaussenA. H. (2017). Evidence base update for psychosocial treatments for disruptive behaviors in children. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 46(4), 477–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2017.1310044
22.
LevinH. M.BelfieldC. (2015). Guiding the development and use of cost-effectiveness analysis in education. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8(3), 400–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2014.915604
23.
LevinH. M.McEwanP. J. (2001). Cost-effectiveness analysis: Methods and applications. SAGE.
24.
MerikangasK. R.He J-p BursteinM.SwendsenJ.AvenevoliS.CaseB.GeorgiadesK.HeatonL.SwansonS.OlfsonM. (2011). Service utilization for lifetime mental disorders in U.S. adolescents: Results of the National Comorbidity Survey-Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 50(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2010.10.006
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Advancing the power of economic evidence to inform investments in children, youth, and families. The National Academies Press.
27.
NockM. K.PhotosV. (2006). Parent motivation to participate in treatment: Assessment and prediction of subsequent participation. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 15(3), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-006-9022-4
28.
NoltemeyerA. L.WardR. M.McLoughlinC. (2015). Relationship between school suspension and student outcomes: A meta-analysis. School Psychology Review, 44(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.17105/spr-14-0008.1
29.
PageT. F.PelhamW. E.IIIFabianoG. A.GreinerA. R.GnagyE. M.HartK. C.CoxeS.WaxmonskyJ. G.FosterE. M.PelhamW. E.Jr. (2016). Comparative cost analysis of sequential, adaptive, behavioral, pharmacological, and combined treatments for childhood ADHD. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 45(4), 416–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2015.1055859
30.
PelhamW. E.Jr.FabianoG. A.WaxmonskyJ. G.GreinerA. R.GnagyE. M.PelhamW. E.IIICoxeS.VerleyJ.BhatiaI.HartK.KarchK.KonijnendijkE.TrescoK.Nahum-ShaniI.MurphyS. A. (2016). Treatment sequencing for childhood ADHD: A multiple-randomization study of adaptive medication and behavioral interventions. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 45(4), 396–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2015.1105138
31.
PelhamW. E.Jr.FosterE. M.RobbJ. A. (2007). The economic impact of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32(6), 711–727. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsm022
32.
SampaioF.FeldmanI.LavelleT. A.SkokauskasN. (2021). The cost-effectiveness of treatments for attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder in children and adolescents: A systematic review. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01748-z
33.
SpragueJ.GollyA. (2013). BEST behavior. Building positive behavior support in schools (2nd ed.). Sopris Learning.
34.
SumiW. C.WoodbridgeM. W.JavitzH. S.ThorntonS. P.WagnerM.RouspilK.YuJ. W.SeeleyJ. R.WalkerH. M.GollyA.SmallJ. W.FeilE. G.SeversonH. H. (2013). Assessing the effectiveness of First Step to Success: Are short-term results the first step to long-term behavioral improvements?Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 21(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426611429571
35.
TranJ. L. A.ShengR.BeaulieuA.VillodasM.McBurnettK.PfiffnerL. J.WilsonL. (2018). Cost-effectiveness of a behavioral psychosocial treatment integrated across home and school for pediatric ADHD-inattentive type. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 45(5), 741–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-018-0857-y
United States Department of Education, Institute for Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. (n.d.). What works clearinghouse. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/
United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018b). Table 4. Private industry workers by occupational and industry group. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t04.htm
40.
WalkerH. M.FeilE. G.FreyA.SmallJ.SeeleyJ.GollyA.CrosbyS.LeeJ.FornessS.SprickM.CoughlinC.StillerB. (2018). First Step Next: An updated version of the First Step to Success early intervention program. Perspectives on Early Childhood in Psychology and Education, 3(1), 89–109.
41.
WalkerH. M.KavanaghK.StillerB.GollyA.SeversonH. H.FeilE. G. (1998). First Step to Success: An early intervention approach for preventing school antisocial behavior. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 6(2), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/106342669800600201
42.
WalkerH. M.SeeleyJ. R.SmallJ.SeversonH. H.GrahamB. A.FeilE. G.SernaL.GollyA. M.FornessS. R. (2009). A randomized controlled trial of the First Step to Success early intervention: Demonstration of program efficacy outcomes in a diverse, urban school district. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 17(4), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426609341645
43.
WalkerH. M.SeversonH. H.FeilE. G. (2014). Systematic screening for behavior disorders (SSBD): User’s guide and technical manual (Rev. 2nd ed.). Pacific Northwest Publishing.
44.
WalkerH. M.StillerB.CoughlinC.GollyA.SprickM.FeilE. (2015). First Step Next. Pacific Northwest Publishing.
Webster-StrattonC.ReidM. J.HammondM. (2004). Treating children with early-onset conduct problems: Intervention outcomes for parent, child, and teacher training. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 33(1), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3301_11
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
