The technology is available to construct technology-intensive homes that are environmentally friendly and have many functions controlled by networked systems. For the benefits of the technology to be realized, the homes must be designed to support human interactions. The authors review characteristics of smart homes and high-performance buildings with an emphasis on issues concerning human interactions with technologies. Inhabitant-centered design recommendations are described, including incorporating inhabitants’ living behaviors into the design process; providing universal accessibility; linking devices, appliances, and functions with “meaningful” connections; using simple forms of human-technology interaction; and presenting integrated information for multiple environmental variables in addition to information about the individual variables.
DavidoffS.LeeM. K.YiuC.ZimmermanJ.DeyA. K. (2006). Principles of smart home control. In Ubicomp, LNCS 4206 (pp. 19–34). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
4.
DewsburyG.TaylorB.EdgeM. (2001, September). The process of designing appropriate smart homes: Including the user in the design. Paper presented at the 1st Equator IRC Workshop on Ubiquitous Computing in Domestic Environments, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
5.
EdgeH. M.TaylorB.DewsburyG.GrovesM. A. (2000). The potential for smart home systems in meeting the care needs of older persons and people with disabilities. Senior’s Housing Update, 10(1), 6–8.
6.
EmilianiP. L.StephanidisC. (2005). Universal access to ambient intelligence environments: Opportunities and challenges for people with disabilities. IBM Systems Journal, 44, 605–619.
7.
HenkemansO. A. B.CaineK. E.RogersW. A.FiskA. D.NeerincxM. A.RuyterB. D. (2007, April). Medical monitoring for independent living: User-centered design of smart home technologies for older adults. Paper presented at the Med-e-Tel Conference for eHealth, Telemedicine and Health Information and Communication Technologies, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
JeongK.ProctorR. W.SalvendyG. (2009, July). Grouping preferences of Americans and Koreans in interfaces for smart home control. Paper presented at LNCS and LNAI: 13th HCI International Conference, San Diego, CA.
11.
LaquatraJ.PillaiG.SinghA.SyalM. G. (2008). Green and healthy housing. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 14, 94–97.
12.
LeventhalL.ZajicekM. (2002). “When I’m sixty-four . . .”: Are there real strategies for providing universal accessibility for the elderly. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 694–695). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
13.
MannW.HelalS. (2002). Smart phones for the elders: Boosting the intelligence of smart homes (AAAI Tech. Rep. WS-02-02). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
14.
MarkopoulosP.RuyterB. D.PrivenderS.BreemenA. V. (2005). Case study: Bringing social intelligence into home dialogue systems. Interactions, 12(4), 37–44.
15.
McDermottH.HaslamR.GibbA. (2007). The interaction between design and occupier behavior in the safety of new homes. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39, 258–266.
16.
MozerM. C. (1998). The neural network house: An environment that adapts to its inhabitants. In CoenM. (Ed.), Proceedings of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence Spring Symposium on Intelligent Environments (pp. 110–114). Menlo, Park, CA: AAAI Press.
ParkS. H.WonS. H.LeeJ. B.KimS. W. (2003). Smart home: Digitally engineered domestic life. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 7, 189–196.
19.
ParsonsK. C. (2000). Environmental ergonomics: A review of principles, methods and models. Applied Ergonomics, 31, 581–594.
20.
RoddenT.BenfordS. (2003). The evolution of buildings and implications for the design of ubiquitous domestic environments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 9–16). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
21.
TorcelliniP.PlessS.DeruM.GriffithB.LongN.JudkoffR. (2006). Lessons learned from case studies of six high-performance buildings (Tech. Rep. NREL/TP-550-37542). Retrieved from http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy06osti/37542.pdf
22.
WoodG.NewboroughM. (2007). Energy-use information transfer for intelligent homes: Enabling energy conservation with central and local displays. Energy & Buildings, 39, 495–503.
23.
WoodruffA.AugustinS.FoucaultB. (2007). Sabbath day home automation: “It’s like mixing technology and religion.” In CHI ’07 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 527–536). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
