We examined the impact of warning label size and design style on consumer attention to toy choking hazard warnings across three front-of-package (FOP) designs, using eye-tracking metrics. Our findings indicate that larger labels and high-contrast designs significantly enhance consumer attention. Additionally, typical warning placements on the FOP resulted in lower eye-tracking metrics. These results underscore the importance of safety compliance, as regulated label sizes and design styles enhance warning effectiveness. Revisiting warning label placement is also essential to improve hazard communication. These insights should guide toy manufacturers and importers in enhancing child safety by ensuring clearer, more effective warning labels.
ArdiyantoA.SahistyaR.HalaliaY.TrapsilawatiF. (2024). Hazard perception of safety signal words among educated non-English speakers. In NgY. G.DaruisD. D. I.Abdul WahatN. W. (Eds.), Human factors and ergonomics toward an inclusive and sustainable future (46, pp. 409–417): Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60863-6_32
3.
ArdiyantoA.SaraswatiL. A.RahmatikaF.AfandiA. R.TrapsilawatiF. (2023). Comprehension of international safety signs: A prospective technical workers context. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 98, 103523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2023.103523
4.
BarbosaA. A. L.de MouraJ. A.de MedeirosD. D. (2021). Positioning of design elements on the packaging of frozen convenience food and consumers’ levels of attention: An experiment using pizza boxes. Food Quality and Preference, 87, 104044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104044
5.
BeckerM.EdwardsS.MasseyR. I. (2010). Toxic chemicals in toys and children’s products: Limitations of current responses and recommendations for government and industry. Environmental Science and Technology, 44(21), 7986–7991. https://doi.org/10.1021/es1009407
6.
ByrneS.Greiner SafiA.KempD.SkurkaC.DavydovaJ.ScolereL.MathiosA. D.AveryR. J.DorfM. C.SteinhardtJ.NiederdeppeJ. (2019). Effects of varying color, imagery, and text of cigarette package warning labels among socioeconomically disadvantaged middle school youth and adult smokers. Health Communication, 34(3), 306–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1407228
7.
BzostekJ. A.WogalterM. S. (1999). Measuring visual search time for a product warning label as a function of icon, color, column and vertical placement. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society - Annual Meeting, 43(16), 888–892. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193129904301603
8.
CabreraM.MachínL.ArrúaA.AntúnezL.CurutchetM. R.GiménezA.AresG. (2017). Nutrition warnings as front-of-pack labels: Influence of design features on healthfulness perception and attentional capture. Public Health Nutrition, 20(18), 3360–3371. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136898001700249X
9.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2002). Nonfatal choking-related episodes among children—United States, 2001. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 51(42), 945–948. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.19.2400-JWR1120-2-1
10.
ChapinM. M.RochetteL. M.AnnestJ. L.HaileyesusT.ConnerK. A.SmithG. A. (2013). Nonfatal choking on food among children 14 Years or younger in the United States, 2001–2009. Pediatrics, 132(2), 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-0260
11.
ClementJ.KristensenT.GrønhaugK. (2013). Understanding consumers’ in-store visual perception: The influence of package design features on visual attention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(2), 234–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.01.003
12.
Committee on Injury, Violence, and Poison Prevention. (2010). Prevention of choking among children. Pediatrics, 125(3), 601–607. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-2862
13.
FeenbergD.GanguliI.GauléP.GruberJ. (2017). It’s good to Be first: Order bias in reading and citing NBER working papers. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00607
14.
FennerJ.HadiA.YehL.SilverbergN. (2020). Hidden risks in toys: A systematic review of pediatric toy contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis, 82(5), 265–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13500
15.
GawasaneA.BixL.de la FuenteJ.SundarR. P.SmithT. J. (2012). Consumer attention to an over-the-counter warning in four different styles of design. Packaging Technology and Science, 25(7), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.979
16.
GutomoW. R. (2024). Pengaruh warning labels style dalam berbagai warna kemasan mainan anak terhadap atensi visual dan risk perception [the influence of warning label styles on visual attention and risk perception across various children’s toy packaging colors]. [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada]. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/244862
HellierE.TuckerM.KennyN.RowntreeA.EdworthyJ. (2010). Merits of using color and shape differentiation to improve the speed and accuracy of drug strength identification on over-the-counter medicines by laypeople. Journal of Patient Safety, 6(3), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1097/pts.0b013e3181eee157
19.
HurleyR.RiceJ.CottrellD.FeltyD. (2016). Effect of metal can labels on consumer attention through eye tracking methodology. Journal of Food Research, 5(6), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/jfr.v5n6p1
20.
HwangJ.YangY.OhY.LeeS.LeeJ.ChoS. (2018). Differences in visual fixation duration according to the position of graphic health warning labels: An eye-tracking approach. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 16, 39. https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/94327
21.
IshiharaS. (1974). Ishihara’s tests for colour-blindness (Concise Edition). Kanehara Shuppan.
KulakS.SteinR. E. K. (2016). Toy age-labeling: An overview for pediatricians of how toys receive their age safety and developmental designations. Pediatrics, 138(1), Article e20151803. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-1803
24.
LaugheryK. R.WogalterM. S. (2014). A three-stage model summarizes product warning and environmental sign research. Safety Science, 61, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.02.012
25.
LavineR.SibertJ.GokturkM.DickensB. (2002). Eye-tracking measures and human performance in a vigilance task. Aviation Space & Environmental Medicine, 73(4), 367–372.
26.
Marques da RosaV.SpenceC.Miletto TonettoL. (2019). Influences of visual attributes of food packaging on consumer preference and associations with taste and healthiness. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 43(2), 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12500
27.
National Standardization Agency. (2010). Keamanan mainan—bagian 1: Aspek keamanan yang berhubungan dengan sifat fisis dan mekanis (SNI ISO 8124-1:2010) [toy safety—Part 1: Safety aspects related to physical and mechanical properties (SNI ISO 8124-1:2010)]. https://sispk.bsn.go.id/SNI/DetailSNI/8452
28.
National Standardization Agency. (2012). Keamanan mainan—bagian 6: Simbol grafis untuk label pengingat usia (SNI 6527.6:2012) [toy safety—Part 6: Graphical symbols for age warning labels (SNI 6527.6:2012)]. https://pesta.bsn.go.id/produk/detail/9204-sni652762012
29.
NeofotistosA.CowlesN.SharmaR. (2017). Choking hazards: Are current product testing methods for small parts adequate?International Journal of Pediatrics, 2017(1), Article e4705618. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4705618
30.
NeuertC. E. (2024). The effect of question positioning on data quality in web surveys. Sociological Methods & Research, 53(1), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124120986207
31.
PetersenA.KyllingsbækS.BundesenC. (2013). Attentional dwell times for targets and masks. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 34. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.3.34
32.
PutriB. S. (2024). Pengaruh ukuran label peringatan dalam berbagai warna kemasan mainan terhadap visual attention dan risk perception [the influence of warning label size on visual attention and risk perception across various toy packaging colors]. [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada]. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/241997
33.
RebollarR.LidónI.MartínJ.PueblaM. (2015). The identification of viewing patterns of chocolate snack packages using eye-tracking techniques. Food Quality and Preference, 39, 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.08.002
34.
SiegristM.Leins-HessR.KellerC. (2015). Which front-of-pack nutrition label is the most efficient one? The results of an eye-tracker study. Food Quality and Preference, 39, 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.010
35.
SnellenH. (1868). Test-types for the determination of the acuteness of vision. Williams and Norgate.
36.
StrasserA. A.TangK. Z.RomerD.JepsonC.CappellaJ. N. (2012). Graphic warning labels in cigarette advertisements. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.026
37.
WangH.OrC. K. L. (2020). Effects of text enhancement, identical prescription-package names, visual cues, and verbal provocation on visual searches of look-alike drug names: A simulation and eye-tracking study. Human Factors, 62(7), 1102–1116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819870700
38.
WedelM.PietersR. (2000). Eye fixations on advertisements and memory for brands: A model and findings. Marketing Science, 19(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.19.4.297.11794
39.
WickensC. D. (2015). Noticing events in the visual workplace: The SEEV and NSEEV models. In HoffmanR.R.HancockP. A.ScerboM. W.ParasuramanR.SzalmaJ. L. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of applied perception research (II, pp. 749–768). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973017.046
40.
WogalterM. S. (1999). Factors influencing the effectiveness of warnings. In ZwagaH.BoersemaT.HoonhoutH. (Eds.), Visual information for everyday use (pp. 93–110). Taylor & Francis.
