What is the value of non—roll call position taking in Congress? The authors argue that non—roll call positions are used by interest groups to acquire information about the direction and intensity of legislators’ preferences. Legislators, in turn, use them to attract campaign contributions from potential donors. Examining bill sponsorship in the 103rd and 104th Congresses, the authors find a relationship between campaign contributions from labor and gun control political action committees and the positions House Democrats take through bill sponsorship. These results suggest that non—roll call position taking indeed matters.
Achen, Christopher H.1978. Measuring representation. American Journal of Political Science22:475-510.
2.
Adler, E. Scott, and John D. Wilkerson .1993-96. Congressional Bills Project. NSF 00880066 and 0080061.
3.
Adler, E. Scott, and John D. Wilkerson .2005. The scope and urgency of legislation: Reconsidering bill success in the House of Representatives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
4.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, James M. Snyder Jr. , and Charles Stewart III.2001. Candidate positioning in U.S. House elections. American Journal of Political Science45:136-59.
5.
Arnold, R. Douglas.1990. The logic of congressional action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
6.
Austen-Smith, David.1990. Information transmission in debate. American Journal of Political Science34:124-52.
7.
Bartels, Larry M.1991. Constituency opinion and congressional policymaking: The Reagan defense buildup. American Political Science Review85:457-74.
8.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. , Laura W. Arnold, and Christopher J. W. Zorn.1997. The strategic timing of position taking in Congress: A study of the North American Free Trade Agreement. American Political Science Review91:324-38.
9.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. , and James K. Dow.1992. Campaign contributions in an unregulated setting: An analysis of the 1984 and 1986 California Assembly elections. Western Political Quarterly45:609-28.
10.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. , and J. Tobin Grant.1999. All in a day’s work: The financial rewards of legislative effectiveness . Legislative Studies Quarterly24:511-23.
11.
Brady, David W., John F. Cogan, Brian Gaines, and R. Douglas Rivers .1996. The perils of presidential support: How the Republicans captured the house. Political Behavior18:345-68.
Cain, Bruce E., John Ferejohn, and Morris Fiorina.1987. The personal vote: Constituency service and electoral independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
Campbell, James E.1982. Cosponsoring legislation in the US Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly7:415-22.
15.
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, David W. Brady, and John F. Cogan .2002. Out of step, out of office: Electoral accountability and House members’ voting. American Political Science Review96:127-40.
16.
Canon, David T.1999. Race, redistricting, and representation: The unintended consequences of black majority districts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
Chang, Tracy F. H.2003. Electoral activities of southern local unions in the 2000 election. Labor Studies Journal28:53-81.
18.
Cohen, Linda R., and Roger G. Noll .1991. How to vote, whether to vote: Strategies for voting and abstaining on congressional roll calls. Political Behavior13: 97-127.
19.
Cox, Gary W., and Eric Magar.1999. How much is majority status in the US Congress worth?American Political Science Review93:299-309.
20.
Davidson, Roger H.1969. The role of the congressman. New York : Pegasus.
21.
Denzau, Arthur, and Michael Munger.1986. Legislators and interest groups: How unorganized interests get represented. American Political Science Review80:89-106.
22.
Endersby, James W., and Michael C. Munger .1992. The impact of legislator attributes on union PAC campaign contribution. Journal of Labor Research13:79-97.
23.
Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight.1998. The choices justices make. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
24.
Erikson, Robert S.1971. The electoral impact of congressional roll call voting . American Political Science Review65: 1018-32.
25.
---. 1981. Measuring constituency opinion: The 1978 U.S. congressional election survey. Legislative Studies Quarterly6:235-45.
26.
Erikson, Robert S., and Gerald C. Wright .1993. Voters, candidates and issues in congressional elections. In Congress, reconsidered, 5th ed., ed. Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer, 91-114. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
27.
Farrell, Joseph, and Robert Gibbons.1989. Cheap talk can matter in bargaining . Journal of Economic Theory48:221-37.
28.
Fenno, Richard F.1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little Brown and Company.
29.
Fenno, Richard F.1978. Home style: House members in their districts. New York: HarperCollins.
30.
Ferejohn, John, and Charles Shipan.1990. Congressional influence on bureaucracy. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization6:1-19.
31.
Fiorina, Morris P.1974. Representatives, roll calls, and constituencies. Lexington, MD: Lexington Books.
32.
Franzitch, Stephen. E.1979. Who makes our laws? The legislative effectiveness of members of Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly5:409-28.
33.
Gilligan Thomas W., and Keith Krehbiel.1989. Asymmetric information and legislative rules with a heterogeneous committee. American Journal of Political Science33:459-90.
34.
Goff, Brian L., and Kevin B. Grier .1993. On the (mis)measurement of legislator ideology and shirking. Public Choice76:5-19.
35.
Grenzke, Janet M.1989. "PACs and the Congressional Supermarket: The Currency is Complex." American Journal of Political Science33(1):1-24.
36.
Grier, Kevin, and Michael Munger.1991. Committee assignments, constituent preferences and campaign contributions. Economic Inquiry29:24-43.
37.
---. 1993. Comparing interest group PAC contributions to House and Senate incumbents, 1980-1986. Journal of Politics55:615-43.
38.
Grier, Kevin, Michael Munger, and Brian Roberts.1994. The determinants of industry political activity, 1978-1986. American Political Science Review88:911-26.
39.
Groseclose, Tim, Steven D. Levitt, and James M. Snyder Jr.1999. Comparing interest group scores across time and chambers: Adjusted ADA scores for the U.S. Congress . American Political Science Review93:33-50.
40.
Hall, Richard.1996. Participation in Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41.
Hall, Richard, and Frank Wayman.1990. Buying time: Moneyed interests and the mobilization of bias in congressional committeesAmerican Political Science Review84:797-820.
42.
Harris, Douglas B.2005. Orchestrating party talk: A party-based view of one-minute speeches in the House of Representatives. Legislative Studies Quarterly30 (1): 141-55.
43.
Herndon, James F.1982. Access, record, and competition as influences on interest group contributions to congressional campaigns. Journal of Politics44:996-1019.
44.
Hibbing, John R.1991. Congressional careers: Contours of life in the U.S. House of Representatives. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
45.
Highton, Benjamin, and Michael S. Rocca .2005. Beyond the roll call arena: The determinants of position taking in Congress. Political Research Quarterly58:303-17.
46.
Hill, K.Q., and P.A. Hurley.2002. Symbolic speeches in the US Senate and their representational implications. Journal of Politics64:219-31.
47.
Howell, William G., and Jon C. Pevehouse .2007. Congressional checks on presidential war powers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48.
Jackson, David J., and Steven T. Engel .2003. Friends don’t let friends vote for free trade: The dynamics of the labor PAC punishment strategy over PNTR. Political Research Quarterly56:441-48.
49.
Jacobson, Gary C.1996. The 1994 House elections in perspective. Political Science Quarterly111:203-23.
50.
---. 2004. The politics of congressional elections, 6th ed. New York: Longman .
51.
Johannes, John R., and John C. McAdams .1981. The congressional incumbency effect: Is it casework, policy compatibility, or something else? An examination of the 1978 election. American Journal of Political Science25:512-42.
52.
Katzmann, Robert A.1989. The American legislative process as a signal. Journal of Public Policy9:287-306.
53.
Kessler, Daniel, and Keith Krehbiel.1996. Dynamics of cosponsorship. American Political Science Review90:555-66.
54.
Koger, Gregory.2003. Position taking and cosponsorship in the US House. Legislative Studies Quarterly28:225-46.
55.
Krause, George A.1996. The institutional dynamics of policy administration: Bureaucratic influence over securities regulation. American Journal of Political Science40:1083-1121.
56.
Krutz, Glen S.2005. Issues and institutions: Winnowing in the U.S. Congress . American Journal of Political Science49:313-26.
57.
Langbein, Laura I., and Mark A. Lotwis .1990. The political efficacy of lobbying and money: Gun control in the U.S. House, 1986. Legislative Studies Quarterly15 (3): 413-40.
58.
Larson, Bruce A.2004. Incumbent contributions to the congressional campaign contributions, 1990-2000. Political Research Quarterly57:155-61.
59.
Lindsay, James M.1992-93. Congress and foreign policy: Why the hill matters. Political Science Quarterly107:607-28.
60.
Maltzman, Forrest, and Lee Sigelman .1996. The politics of talk: Unconstrained floor time in the US House of Representatives. Journal of Politics58:819-30.
61.
Matthews, Donald R.1960. U.S. senators and their world. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
62.
Martin, Andrew D.2001. Congressional decision making and the separation of powers . American Review of Political Science95:361-78.
63.
Mayhew, David R.1974. Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
64.
McGarrity, Joseph P., and Daniel Sutter.2000. A test of the structure of PAC contractors: An analysis of House gun control votes in the 1980s. Southern Economic Journal67:41-63.
65.
Meernik, James.1995. Congress, the president and the commitment of the U.S. military. Legislative Studies Quarterly20:377-92.
66.
Miller, Warren E., and Donald E. Stokes .1963. Constituency influence in Congress. American Political Science Review57:45-56.
67.
Morris, Jonathan S.2001. Reexamining the politics of talk: Partisan rhetoric in the 104th House. Legislative Studies Quarterly26:101-21.
68.
Morrow, James D.1994. Game theory for political scientists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
69.
Nelson, Forrest and Lawrence Olson.1978. "Specification and Estimation of a Simultaneous-Equation Model with Limited Dependent Variables." International Economic Review19(3):695-709.
70.
Rocca, Michael S.2007. Non-legislative debate in the US House of Representatives . American Politics Research35:489-505.
71.
Rocca, Michael S., and Gabriel R. Sanchez .2008. The effect of race and ethnicity on bill sponsorship and cosponsorship in Congress. American Politics Research36:130-52.
72.
Romer, Thomas, and James M. Snyder Jr.1994. An empirical investigation of the dynamics of PAC contributions. American Journal of Political Science38:745-69.
73.
Roncek, Dennis W.1992. Learning more from tobit coefficients: Extending a comparative analysis of political protest. American Sociological Review57:503-7.
74.
Rudolph, Thomas J.1999. Corporate and Labor PAC contributions in House elections: Measuring the effects of majority party status. Journal of Politics61:195-206.
75.
Sala, Brian R., and James F.Spriggs II2004. Designing tests of the Supreme Court and the separations of powers. Political Research Quarterly57:197-208.
76.
Saltzman, Gregory M.1987. Congressional voting on labor issues: The role of PACs . Industrial and Labor Relations Review40:163-79.
77.
Schiller, Wendy J.1995. Senators as political entrepreneurs: Using bill sponsorship to shape legislative agendas. American Journal of Political Science39:186-203.
78.
Smith, Steven S.1989. Call to order. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
79.
Snyder, James M., Jr.1990. "Campaign Contributions as Investments: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1980-1986." Journal of Political Economy98(6):1195-1227.
80.
Snyder, James M., Jr.1992. Long-term investing in politicians; or, give early, give often. Journal of Law and Economics35:15-43.
81.
Sorauf, Frank J.1992. Inside campaign finance: Myths and realities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
82.
Swers, Michele L.2000. The difference women make: The policy impact of women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
83.
Wilhite, Allen, and John Theilmann.1987. Labor PAC contributions and labor legislation: A simultaneous logit approach. Public Choice53:267-76.
84.
Wilson, Rick K., and Cheryl D. Young .1997. Cosponsorship in the US Congress . Legislative Studies Quarterly22:25-43.
85.
Wittenberg, Ernest and Elisabeth Wittenberg.1989. How to Win in Washington: Very Practical Advice about Lobbying, the Grassroots, and the Media. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
