The increased availability of the Internet has led to the emergence of new forms of political participation. Opinions differ, however, on whether this has led to a reinforcement of stratification patterns or to the political mobilization of new groups in society. To address this question, the authors conducted a latent class analysis of a U.S. representative sample that indicates that online activism is indeed a distinctive type of political participation. Analysis of the sociodemographic stratification of the identified participation types confirms the mobilization thesis regarding age and gender but finds that traditional socioeconomic status inequalities are reinforced in online political participation.
AnduizaEvaGallegoAinaCantijochMarta. 2010. “Online Political Participation in Spain: The Impact of Traditional and Internet Resources.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics7:356-68.
2.
BartelsLarry M.2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
BaumgartnerJody C.MorrisJonathan S.2010. “Myfacetube Politics: Social Networking Web Sites and Political Engagement of Young Adults.” Social Science Computer Review28:24-44.
4.
BestSamuel J.KruegerBrian S.2005. “Analyzing the Representativeness of Internet Political Participation.” Political Behavior27:183-216.
5.
BimberBruce. 1999. “The Internet and Citizen Communication with Government: Does the Medium Matter?” Political Communication16:409-28.
6.
BimberBruce. 2000. “The Study of Information Technology and Civic Engagement.” Political Communication17:329-33.
7.
BoulianneShelley. 2009. “Does Internet Use Affect Engagement? A Meta-Analysis of Research.” Political Communication26:193-211.
8.
BradyHenry E.SchlozmanKay LehmanVerbaSidney. 1999. “Prospecting for Participants: Rational Expectations and the Recruitment of Political Activists.” American Political Science Review93:153-68.
9.
BreenRichard. 2000. “Why Is Support for Extreme Parties Underestimated by Surveys? A Latent Class Analysis.” British Journal of Political Science30:375-82.
10.
CalendaDavideMeijerAlbert. 2009. “Young People, the Internet, and Political Participation: Findings of a Web Survey in Italy, Spain and the Netherlands.” Information, Communication & Society12:879-98.
11.
ChristensenHenrik S.BengtssonÅsa. 2011. “The Political Competence of Internet Participants: Evidence from Finland.” Information, Communication & Society14:896-916.
12.
Delli CarpiniMichael X.2000. “Gen.Com: Youth, Civic Engagement, and the New Information Environment.” Political Communication17:341-49.
13.
DiMaggioPaulHargittaiEszterCelesteCoralShaferSteven. 2004. “Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use.” In Social Inequality, edited by NeckermanK. M., 355-400. New York: Russell Sage.
14.
FallowsDeborah. 2005. How Women and Men Use the Internet. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
15.
GibsonRachel K.LusoliWainerWardStephen. 2005. “Online Participation in the UK: Testing a ‘Contextualised’ Model of Internet Effects.” British Journal of Politics & International Relations7:561-83.
16.
GilensMartin. 2005. “Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly69:778-96.
17.
HagenaarsJacques A.HalmanLoek C.1989. “Searching for Ideal Types: The Potentialities of Latent Class Analysis.” European Sociological Review5:81-96.
18.
HamptonKeith N.GouletLauren SessionsRainieLeePurcellKristen. 2011. Social Networking Sites and Our Lives. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project.
19.
HoogheMarcVissersSara. 2009. “Reaching Out or Reaching In? The Use of Party Websites during the 2006 Electoral Campaign in Belgium.” Information, Communication and Society12:619-714.
20.
JenningsM. KentZeitnerVicki. 2003. “Internet Use and Civic Engagement: A Longitudinal Analysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly67:311-34.
21.
KenskiKateHardyBruce W.JamiesonKathleen Hall. 2010. The Obama Victory: How Media, Money and Message Shaped the 2008 Elections. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
22.
KruegerBrian S.2002. “Assessing the Potential of Internet Political Participation in the United States: A Resource Approach.” American Politics Research30:476-98.
23.
KruegerBrian S.2006. “A Comparison of Conventional and Internet Political Mobilization.” American Politics Research34:759-76.
24.
LynchMarc. 2011. “After Egypt: The Limits and Promise of Online Challenges to the Authoritarian Arab State.” Perspectives on Politics9:301-10.
25.
MagidsonJayVermuntJeroen K.2004. “Latent Class Models.” In The SAGE Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences, edited by KaplanD., 175-198. London: Sage.
26.
MargolisMichaelResnickDavid. 2000. Politics as Usual: The “Cyberspace Revolution.”Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
MarienSofieHoogheMarcQuintelierEllen. 2010. “Inequalities in Non-Institutionalised Forms of Political Participation: A Multi-Level Analysis of 25 Countries.” Political Studies58:187-213.
28.
McCutcheonAllan L.1985. “A Latent Class Analysis of Tolerance for Nonconformity in the American Public.” Public Opinion Quarterly49:474-88.
29.
MoorsGuyVermuntJeroen K.2007. “Heterogeneity in Post-Materialist Value Priorities: Evidence from a Latent Class Discrete Choice Approach.” European Sociological Review23:631-48.
30.
MossbergerKarenTolbertCaroline J.2010. “Digital Democracy: How Politics Online Is Changing Electoral Participation.” In Oxford Handbook of American Elections and Political Behavior, edited by LeighleyJ., 200-215. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31.
MossbergerKarenTolbertCaroline J.McNealRamona S.2008. Digital Citizenship: The Internet, Society and Participation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32.
MossbergerKarenTolbertCaroline J.StansburyMary. 2003. Virtual Inequality. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
33.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration. 2011. Digital Nation: Expanding Internet Usage. Washington, DC: National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
34.
NorrisPippa. 2000. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35.
OatesSarahOwenDiana M.GibsonRachel K.2006. The Internet and Politics: Citizens, Voters and Activists. London: Routledge.
36.
OnoHiroshiZavodnyMadeline. 2003. “Gender and the Internet.” Social Science Quarterly84:111-21.
RheingoldHoward. 1993. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electric Frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
39.
SchlozmanKay LehmanVerbaSidneyBradyHenry E.2010. “Weapon of the Strong? Participatory Inequality and the Internet.” Perspectives on Politics8:487-509.
40.
ShahDhavan V.ChoJaehoEvelandWilliam P.KwakNojin. 2005. “Information and Expression in a Digital Age.” Communication Research32:531-65.
41.
ShahDhavan V.KwakNojinHolbertR. Lance. 2001. “‘Connecting’ and ‘Disconnecting’ with Civic Life: Patterns of Internet Use and the Production of Social Capital.” Political Communication18:141-62.
