Typologies are well-established analytic tools in the social sciences. They can be “put to work” in forming concepts, refining measurement, exploring dimensionality, and organizing explanatory claims. Yet some critics, basing their arguments on what they believe are relevant norms of quantitative measurement, consider typologies old-fashioned and unsophisticated. This critique is methodologically unsound, and research based on typologies can and should proceed according to high standards of rigor and careful measurement. These standards are summarized in guidelines for careful work with typologies, and an illustrative inventory of typologies, as well as a brief glossary, are included online.
AchenChristopher H.2002. “Toward a New Political Methodology: Microfoundations and ART.” Annual Review of Political Science5:423-50.
2.
AdcockRobertCollierDavid. 2001. “Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research.” American Political Science Review95: 529-46.
3.
AgrestiAlan. 2002. Categorical Data Analysis. 2nd ed.New York: John Wiley.
4.
AldrichJohn H.SullivanJohn L.BorgidaEugene. 1989. “Foreign Affairs and Issue Voting: Do Presidential Candidates ‘Waltz Before a Blind Audience?’”American Political Science Review83:123-41.
5.
AlmondGabriel A.1956. “Comparative Political Systems.” Journal of Politics18:391-409.
6.
AlmondGabrielPowellG. BinghamJr.1966. Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach. Boston: Little, Brown.
7.
BabbieEarl. 2010. The Practice of Social Research. 12th ed.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
8.
BaileyKenneth D.1994. Typologies and Taxonomies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
BarrettPaul. 2008. “The Consequence of Sustaining a Pathology: Scientific Stagnation.” Measurement6:78-123.
10.
BartonAllen H.1955. “The Concept of Property-Space in Social Research.” In The Language of Social Research: A Reader in the Methodology of Social Research, edited by LazarsfeldPaul F.RosenbergMorris40-62. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
11.
BennettA.ElmanC.2006. “Qualitative Research: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods.” Annual Review of Political Science9:455-76.
12.
BlalockHubert. 1982. Conceptualization and Measurement in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
13.
BollenKenneth A.1980. “Issues in the Comparative Measurement of Political Democracy.” American Sociological Review45:370-90.
14.
BollenKenneth A.JackmanRobert W.1985. “Political Democracy and the Size Distribution of Income.” American Sociological Review50:438-57.
15.
BorgattaEdgar F.BohrnstedtGeorge W.1980. “Level of Measurement: Once Over Again.” Sociological Methods and Research9:47-60.
16.
BradyHenry E.AnsolabehereStephen. 1989. “The Nature of Utility Functions in Mass Publics.” American Political Science Review83:143-63.
17.
BrattonMichaelvan de WalleNicholas. 1997. Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
CampbellN. R.1920. Physics: The Elements. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
CarminesEdward G.StimsonJames A.1980. “The Two Faces of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review74:78-91.
20.
CliffNorman. 1983. “Some Cautions Concerning the Application of Causal Modeling Methods.” Multivariate Behavioral Research18:115-26.
21.
CollierDavidBradyHenry E.SeawrightJason. 2010. “Sources of Leverage in Causal Inference: Toward an Alternative View of Methodology.” In Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, edited by BradyHenry E.CollierDavid, 2nd ed.161-91. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
22.
CollierDavidGerringJohn, eds. 2009. Concepts and Method in Social Science: The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
23.
CollierDavidLevitskySteven. 1997. “Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research.” World Politics49:430-51.
24.
CollierDavidLevitskySteven. 2009. “Democracy: Conceptual Hierarchies in Comparative Research.” In Concepts and Method in Social Science: The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori, edited by CollierDavidGerringJohn, 269-88. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
25.
CollierDavidMahonJames E.Jr.1993. “Conceptual Stretching Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review87:845-55.
26.
CollierRuth BerinsDavidCollier. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
CoppedgeMichaelAlvarezAngelMaldonadoClaudia. 2008. “Two Persistent Dimensions of Democracy: Contestation and Inclusiveness.” Journal of Politics70:632-47.
28.
CoppedgeMichaelReinickeWolfgang H.1990. “Measuring Polyarchy.” Studies in Comparative International Development25:51-72.
29.
DahlRobert A.1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30.
DaltonRussell J.2006. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. 4th ed.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
31.
DaveyBrian A.PriestleyHilary A.2002. Introduction to Lattices and Order. 2nd ed.New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
DuncanOtis Dudley. 1984. Notes on Social Measurement: Historical and Critical. New York: Russell Sage.
33.
DuvergerMaurice. 1954. Political Parties. London: Methuen.
34.
ElmanColin. 2005. “Explanatory Typologies in Qualitative Studies of International Politics.” International Organization59:293-326.
35.
EvansPeter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
FishM. Steven. 2007. “Really Strange Regimes: Personality Cults and Personalistic Dictatorships in the Modern World.” Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley.
37.
FreedmanDavid A.1987a. “As Others See Us: A Case Study in Path Analysis.” Journal of Educational Statistics12:101-28.
38.
FreedmanDavid A.1987b. “A Rejoinder on Models, Metaphors, and Fables.” Journal of Educational Statistics12:206-23.
39.
GillJeff. 2006. Essential Mathematics for Political and Social Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
GoertzGary. 2006. Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
GuntherRichardDiamondLarry. 2003. “Species of Political Parties: A New Typology.” Party Politics9: 167-99.
42.
HallPeter A.GingerichDaniel W.2009. “Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Political Economy: An Empirical Analysis.” British Journal of Political Science39:449-82.
43.
HallPeter A.SoskiceDavid. 2001. “An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism.” In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, edited by HallPeter A.SoskiceDavid, 1-68. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44.
HibbsDouglas A.Jr.1987. The Political Economy of Industrial Democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
HirschmanAlbert O.1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46.
HirschmanAlbert O.1981. Essays in Trespassing: From Economics to Politics and Beyond. New York: Cambridge University Press.
47.
JackmanRobert W.1985. “Cross-National Statistical Research and the Study of Comparative Politics.” American Journal of Political Science29:161-82.
48.
KaganRobert. 2001. Adversarial Legalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
KallebergArthur L.1966. “The Logic of Comparison: A Methodological Note on the Comparative Study of Political Systems.” World Politics19:69-82.
50.
KatzRichard S.MairPeter. 1995. “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party.” Party Politics1:5-28.
51.
KingGaryKeohaneRobert O.VerbaSidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
KirchheimerOtto. 1966. “The Transformation of the Western European Party Systems.” In Political Parties and Political Development, edited by LaPalombaraJosephWeinerMyron, 177-200. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53.
KrasnerStephen. 1977. “United States Commercial and Monetary Policy: Unraveling the Paradox of External Strength and Internal Weakness.” International Organization31:635-71.
54.
LanningEldon. 1974. “A Typology of Latin American Political Systems.” Comparative Politics6:367-94.
55.
LeonardDavid K.1982. “Analyzing the Organizational Requirements for Serving the Rural Poor.” In Institutions of Rural Development for the Poor: Decentralization and Organizational Linkages, Research Series No. 49, edited by LeonardDavid K.MarshallDale Rogers, 27-37. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California, Berkeley.
56.
LevyJonah D.2006. The State after Statism: New State Activities in the Age of Liberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
LinzJuan J.1975. “Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes.” In Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 3, edited GreensteinFred I.PolsbyNelson W., 175-411. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
58.
LoehlinJohn C.2004. Latent Variable Models. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
59.
MankiwN. Gregory. 1998. Principles of Microeconomics. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
60.
MaresIsabela. 2003. “The Sources of Business Interest in Social Insurance.” World Politics55:229-58.
61.
MarksLawrence E.1974. Sensory Processes: The New Psychophysics. New York: Academic Press.
62.
MazurAmy. 2001. State Feminism, Women’s Movements, and Job Training: Making Democracies Work in the Global Economy. New York: Routledge.
63.
McFaulMichael. 2002. “The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship: Noncooperative Transitions in the Postcommunist World.” World Politics54:212-44.
64.
McKinneyJohn C.1966. Constructive Typology and Social Theory. New York: Meredith.
65.
MichellJoel. 1990. An Introduction to the Logic of Psychological Measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
66.
MichellJoel. 1997. “Quantitative Science and the Definition of Measurement in Psychology.” British Journal of Psychology88:355-83.
67.
MichellJoel. 1999. Measurement in Psychology: Critical History of a Methodological Concept. New York: Cambridge University Press.
MillerBenjamin. 2009. “Between the Revisionist and the Frontier State: Regional Variations in State War-Propensity.” Review of International Studies35:85-119.
70.
MurilloM. Victoria. 2000. “From Populism to Neoliberalism: Labor Unions and Market Reforms in Latin America.” World Politics52:135-74.
71.
MusgraveRichard A.1983. “Public Goods.” In Paul Samuelson and Modern Economic Theory, edited by BrownE. CarySolowRobert M., 141-56. New York: McGraw-Hill.
72.
MutzDiana C.2007. “Effects of ‘In-Your-Face’ Television Discourse on Perceptions of a Legitimate Opposition.” American Political Science Review101:621-35.
73.
NarensLouis. 2002. Theories of Meaningfulness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
74.
NichterSimeon. 2008. “Vote Buying or Turnout Buying? Machine Politics and the Secret Ballot.” American Political Science Review102:19-31.
75.
O’DonnellGuillermoSchmitterPhilippe C.1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
76.
OstromElinorGardnerRoyWalkerJames. 1994. Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
77.
PiersonPaul. 2003. “Big, Slow-Moving, and . . . Invisible: Macrosocial Processes in the Study of Comparative Politics.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by MahoneyJamesRueschemeyerDietrich, 177-207. New York: Cambridge University Press.
78.
PooleKeith T.2008. “The Evolving Influence of Psychometrics in Political Science.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, edited by Box-SteffensmeierJanetBradyHenry E.CollierDavid, 199-213. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
79.
PorkessRoger. 1991. Dictionary of Statistics. New York: HarperCollins.
80.
ReckaseMarc D.1997. “A Linear Logistic Multidimensional Model for Dichotomous Item Response Data.” In Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory, edited by van der LindenWim J.HambletonRonald K., 271-86. New York: Springer.
81.
RogowskiRonald. 1989. Commerce and Coalitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
82.
RubinDonald B.2006. Matched Sampling for Causal Effects. New York: Cambridge University Press.
83.
SalkindNeil, ed. 2007. Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
84.
SamuelsonPaul A.1954. “The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure.” Review of Economics and Statistics36:387-89.
85.
SartoriGiovanni. 1970. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review64:1033-53.
86.
SartoriGiovanni, ed. 1984. Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
87.
SchmitterPhilippe C.1974. “Still the Century of Corporatism?”Review of Politics36:85-105.
88.
SchmitterPhilippe C.1977. “Modes of Interest Intermediation and Models of Societal Change in Western Europe.” Comparative Political Studies. 10:7-38.
89.
ShivelyW. Phillips. 1980. The Craft of Political Research. 2nd ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
90.
ShivelyW. Phillips. 2007. The Craft of Political Research. 7th ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
91.
SnidermanM. Paul1981. A Question of Loyalty. Berkeley: University of California Press.
92.
SteigerJames H.2001. “Driving Fast in Reverse: The Relationship between Software Development, Theory, and Education in Structural Equation Modeling.” Journal of the American Statistical Association96:331-38.
93.
StevensStanley S.1946. “On the Theory of Scales of Measurement.” Science103:677-80.
94.
StevensS. S.1975. Psychophysics: Introduction to its Perceptual, Neural and Social Prospects. New York: Wiley.
95.
StinchcombeArthur L.1968. Constructing Social Theories. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
96.
TakaneYoshioLeeuwJan de. 1987. “On the Relationship between Item Response Theory and Factor Analysis of Discreticized Variables.” Psychometrika52:393-408.
97.
TarrowSidney. 2005. The New Transnational Activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
98.
TeghtsoonianR.2002. “Stevens, Stanley Smith (1906-73).” In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15104-8. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
TiryakianEdward A.1968. “Typologies.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 16, 177-86. New York: Macmillan.
101.
TiryakianEdward A.NevitteNeil. 1985. “Nationalism and Modernity.” In New Nationalisms of the Developed West, edited by TiryakianEdward A.RogowskiRonald, 57-86. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
102.
TreierSeanJackmanSimon (2008). “Democracy as a Latent Variable.” American Journal of Political Science52:201-17.
103.
VasquezJohn. 1993. The War Puzzle. New York: Cambridge University Press.
104.
VogtPaul W.2005. Dictionary of Statistics & Methodology: A Nontechnical Guide for the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
105.
WeberMax. 1978. Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
106.
YoungForrest. 1981. “Quantitative Analysis of Qualitative Data.” Psychometrika46:357-88.
107.
ZiblattDaniel. 2006. Structuring the State: The Formation of Italy and Germany and the Puzzle of Federalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
