Women’s political representation exhibits substantial cross-national variation. While mechanisms shaping these variations are well understood for Western democracies, there is little consensus on how these same factors operate in less developed countries. Effects of two political institutions—electoral systems and gender quotas—are tested across 168 countries from 1992 to 2010. Findings indicate that key causal factors interact with a country’s socioeconomic development, shifting their importance and possibly even direction at various development thresholds. Generalizing broadly across countries, therefore, does not adequately represent the effects of these political institutions. Rather, different institutional changes are advised to increase women’s presence in national governments.
BauerGretchenBrittonHannah, eds. 2006. Women in African parliaments. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
2.
CarrollSusan. 2001. Representing women: State legislators as agents of policy-related change. In The impact of women in public office, edited by CarrolSusan, 3-21. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
Central Intelligence Agency. 1992-2010. The World Fact book. Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency.
5.
ChafetzJanet Saltzman. 1990. Gender equity: An integrated theory of stability and change. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
DahlerupDrude, ed. 2006. Women, quotas and politics. New York: Routledge Research in Comparative Politics.
7.
DahlerupDrude. 2010. From a small to a large minority: Women in Scandinavian politics. In Women, gender, and politics: A reader, edited by KrookMonaChildsSarah, 225-30. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
DahlerupDrudeFriedenvallLenita. 2005. Quotas as a “fast track” to equal representation for women: Why Scandinavia is no longer the model. International Feminist Journal of Politics7 (1): 26-48.
9.
Del CampoEsther. 2005. Women and politics in Latin America: Perspectives and limits of the institutional aspects of women’s political representation. Social Forces83 (4): 1697-1725.
10.
DiamondLarry Jay. 2002. Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy13 (2): 21-35.
11.
Freedom House. 2012. Freedom in the world country ratings:1972-2011. Washington, DC: Freedom House.
12.
HughesMelanie. 2009. Armed conflict, international linkages, and women’s parliamentary representation in developing nations. Social Problems56 (1): 174-204.
13.
HughesMelaniePaxtonPamela. 2007. Familiar theories from a new perspective: The implications of a longitudinal approach to women in politics research. Politics and Gender3 (3): 370-78.
14.
InglehartRonaldNorrisPippa. 2003. Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
International IDEA. 2006. Electoral system design. Stockholm, Sweden: International IDEA.
16.
KenworthyLaneMalamiMelissa. 1999. Gender inequality in political representation: A worldwide comparative analysis. Social Forces78 (1): 235-68.
17.
KittilsonMiki Caul. 2006. Challenging parties, changing parliaments: Women and elected office in contemporary Western Europe. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
18.
KrookMona Lena. 2006. Reforming representation: The diffusion of candidate gender quotas worldwide. Politics and Gender2 (3): 303-27.
19.
KrookMona Lena. 2010. Women’s representation in parliament: A qualitative comparative analysis. Political Studies58 (5): 886-908.
20.
LovenduskiJoniNorrisPippa. 2004. Westminster women: The politics of presence. Political Studies51 (1): 84-102.
21.
MahoneyJamesGoertzGary. 2004. The possibility principle: Choosing negative cases in comparative research. American Political Science Review98 (4): 653-69.
22.
MatlandRichard. 1998. Women’s representation in national legislatures: Developed and developing countries. Legislative Studies Quarterly23 (1): 109-25.
23.
MatlandRichard. 2006. Electoral quotas: Frequency and effectiveness. In Women, quotas and politics, edited by DahlerupDrude, 275-92. New York: Routledge Research in Comparative Politics.
24.
McConnaughyCorrine M.2007. Seeing gender over the short and long haul. Gender and Politics3 (3): 378-86.
25.
MooreGwenShackmanGene. 1996. Gender and authority: A cross-national study. Social Science Quarterly77 (2): 273-88.
26.
OakesAnnAlmquistElizabeth. 1993. Women in national legislature: A cross-national test of macrostructural gender theories. Population Research Policy and Review12:71-81.
27.
PaxtonPamela. 1997. Women in national legislatures: A cross-national analysis. Social Science Research26:442-64.
28.
PaxtonPamelaGreenJenniferHughesMelanie. 2008. Women in parliament, 1945-2003: Cross-national dataset [Computer file]. ICPSR24340-v1. Ann Arbor: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
29.
PaxtonPamelaHughesMelanie. 2007. Women, politics, and power: A global perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
30.
PaxtonPamelaHughesMelanie M.PainterMatthew A.II.2009. Growth in women’s political representation: A longitudinal exploration of democracy, electoral system, and gender quotas. Working Paper: 09-01. Center for the Study of Democracy.
31.
PaxtonPamelaKunovichSheri. 2003. Women’s political representation: The importance of ideology. Social Forces82 (1): 87-113.
32.
PaxtonPamelaKunovichSheri. 2005. Pathways to power: The role of political parties in women’s national political representation. American Journal of Sociology111 (2): 505-52.
33.
PhillipsAnne. 1995. The politics of presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
34.
ReynoldsAndrew. 1999. Women in the legislatures and executives of the world: Knocking at the highest glass ceiling. World Politics51 (4): 547-72.
35.
RitterGretchen. 2007. Gender and politics over time. Politics and Gender3 (3): 386-97.
36.
RuleWilma. 1987. Electoral systems, contextual factors, and women’s opportunities for election to parliament in twenty-three democracies. Western Political Quarterly40:477-98.
37.
StevensAnne. 2007. Women, power and politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
Tolleson-Rinehart. 2001. Do women leaders make a difference? In The impact of women in public office, edited by CarrolSusan, 149-65. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
39.
TremblayManon. 2008. Women and legislative representation: Electoral systems, political parties, and sex quotas. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
40.
TrippAili MariKangAlice. 2008. The global impact of quotas: On the fast track to increased female legislative representation. Comparative Political Studies41 (3): 338-61.
41.
TrippAiliKonateDiorLowe-MornaColleen. 2006. Sub-Saharan Africa: On the fast track to women’s political representation. In Women, quotas and politics, edited by DahlerupDrude, 112-37. New York: Routledge Research in Comparative Politics.
42.
United Nations. 2008. Human Development Indices. New York: United Nations Statistics Division.
43.
United Nations. 2010. The world’s women 2010. New York: United Nations Statistics Division.
44.
ViternaJocelynFallonKathleenBeckfieldJason. 2008. How development matters: A research note on the relationship between development, democracy and women’s political representation. International Journal of Comparative Sociology49 (6): 455-77.
45.
WängnerudLena. 2009. Women in parliaments: Descriptive and substantive representation. Annual Review of Political Science12:51-69.
46.
World Bank. 2010. Worldwide governance indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.
