The 113th Congress has a record number of racial and ethnic minorities serving on Capitol Hill. Using the 2008 Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES), we examine what this increased descriptive representation of racial minorities means for legislative responsiveness and citizen–representative communication in the U.S. House. We argue that descriptive representation will improve the constituent–legislator relationship across racial groups, but that shared race should matter more for blacks and Latinos as racial minorities unaccustomed to legislative responsiveness. Our findings follow these expectations and suggest that the presence or lack of descriptive representation is an integral part of how citizens experience representation in the U.S. House.
AbneyF. GlennHutchesonJohn D.1981. “Race, Representation, and Trust: Changes in Attitudes after the Election of a Black Mayor.” Public Opinion Quarterly45 (1): 91–101.
2.
AbramsonPaul R.1972. “Political Efficacy and Political Trust among Black Schoolchildren: Two Explanations.” Journal of Politics34 (4): 1243–75.
3.
AbramsonPaul R.1983. Political Attitudes in America: Formation and Change. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
4.
AchenChristopher H.1978. “Measuring Representation.” American Journal of Political Science22 (3): 475–510.
5.
AnsolabehereStephen. 2009. “Cooperative Congressional Election Study, 2008.” Common Content. [Computer File] Release 1, February2. Cambridge, MA: MIT [producer].
6.
AnsolabehereStephenBradyDavidFiorinaMorris. 1992. “The Vanishing Marginals and Electoral Responsiveness.” British Journal of Political Science22 (1): 21–38.
7.
AnsolabehereStephenJonesPhilip E.2010. “Constituents’ Responses to Congressional Roll-Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science54 (3): 583–97.
8.
BafumiJosephHerronMichael C.2010. “Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and Their Members of Congress.” American Political Science Review104 (3): 519–42.
9.
BaileyMichaelBradyDavid W.1998. “Heterogeneity and Representation: The Senate and Free Trade.” American Journal of Political Science42 (2): 524–44.
10.
BanducciSusan A.DonovanToddKarpJeffrey A.2004. “Minority Representation, Empowerment, and Participation.” Journal of Politics66 (2): 534–56.
11.
BowenDaniel C.Forthcoming. “Boundaries, Redistricting Criteria, and Representation in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Politics Research.
12.
Box-SteffensmeierJanet M.KimballDavid C.MeinkeScott R.TateKatherine. 2003. “The Effects of Political Representation and the Electoral Advantages of House Incumbents.” Political Research Quarterly56 (3): 259–70.
13.
BrownRupert. 2010. Prejudice: Its Social Psychology. 2nd ed.Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
14.
ButlerDaniel M.BroockmanDavid E.2011. “Do Politicians Racially Discriminate against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science55 (3): 463–77.
15.
CainBruce E.FerejohnJohn A.FiorinaMorris P.1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
CameronCharlesEpsteinDavidO’HalloranSharyn. 1996. “Do Majority Minority Districts Maximize Black Substantive Representation in Congress?”American Political Science Review90 (4): 794–812.
17.
CanonDavid T.1999. Race, Redistricting, and Representation: The Unintended Consequences of Black Majority Districts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
CasellasJason P.2011. Latino Representation in State Houses and Congress. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
CrespinMichael H.2005. “Using Geographic Information Systems to Measure District Change, 2000–2002.” Political Analysis13 (3): 253–60.
20.
de la GarzaRodolfo O.LouisDeSipioGarciaF. ChrisGarciaJohnFalconAngelo. 1992. Latino Voices: Mexican, Puerto Rican, and Cuban Perspectives on American Politics. Boulder: Westview Press.
21.
DesposatoScott W.PetrocikJohn R.2003. “The Variable Incumbency Advantage: New Voters, Redistricting, and the Personal Vote.” American Journal of Political Science47 (1): 18–32.
22.
EriksonRobert S.1978. “Constituency Opinions and Congressional Behavior: A Reexamination of the Miller-Stokes Representation Data.” American Journal of Political Science22 (3): 511–35.
23.
EulauHeinzKarpsPaul D.1977. “The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness.” Legislative Studies Quarterly2 (3): 233–54.
24.
FosterLorn S.1978. “Black Perceptions of the Mayor: An Empirical Test.” Urban Affairs Quarterly14 (2): 245–52.
25.
FrederickBrian. 2008. “Constituency Population and Representation in the U.S. House.” American Politics Research36 (3): 358–81.
26.
GambleKatrina L.2007. “Black Political Representation: An Examination of Legislative Activity within U.S. House Committees.” Legislative Studies Quarterly32 (3): 421–47.
27.
GayClaudine. 2002. “Spirals of Trust? The Effect of Descriptive Representation on the Relationship between Citizens and Their Government.” American Journal of Political Science46 (4): 717–32.
28.
GerberElisabeth R.LewisJeffrey B.2004. “Beyond the Median: Voter Preferences, District Heterogeneity, and Political Representation.” Journal of Political Economy112 (6): 1364–83.
29.
GoodwinGeorge. 1959. “The Seniority System in Congress.” American Political Science Review53 (2): 412–36.
30.
GriffinJohn D.2006. “Electoral Competition and Democratic Responsiveness: A Defense of the Marginality Hypothesis.” American Journal of Political Science68 (4): 911–21.
31.
GriffinJohn D.PatrickFlavin. 2011. “How Citizens and Their Legislators Prioritize Spheres of Representation.” Political Research Quarterly64 (3): 520-533.
32.
GriffinJohn D.NewmanBrian. 2007. “The Unequal Representation of Latinos and Whites.” Journal of Politics69 (4): 1032–46.
33.
GriffinJohn D.NewmanBrian. 2008. Minority Report: Evaluating Political Equality in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34.
GrimmerJustin. 2013. “Appropriators Not Position Takers: The Distorting Effects of Electoral Incentives on Congressional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science57 (3): 624–42.
35.
GroseChristian R.2011. Congress in Black and White: Race and Representation in Washington and at Home. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
GroseChristian R.MangumMauriceMartinChristopher D.2007. “Race, Political Empowerment, and Constituency Service: Descriptive Representation and the Hiring of African-American Congressional Staff.” Polity39 (4): 449–78.
37.
HardenJeffrey J.2013. “Multidimensional Responsiveness: The Determinants of Legislators’ Representational Priorities.” Legislative Studies Quarterly38 (2): 155–84.
38.
HayesDannyMcKeeSeth C.2009. “The Participatory Effects of Redistricting.” American Journal of Political Science53 (4): 1006–1023.
39.
HeroRodney E.TolbertCaroline J.1995. “Latinos and Substantive Representation in the U.S. House of Representatives: Direct, Indirect, or Nonexistent?” American Journal of Political Science39 (3): 640–52.
40.
HeroRodney E.TolbertCaroline J.1996. “A Racial/Ethnic Interpretation of Politics and Policy in the States of the U.S.” American Journal of Political Science40 (3): 851–71.
41.
HillKevin A.1995. “Does the Creation of Majority Black Districts Aid Republicans? An Analysis of the 1992 Congressional Elections in Eight Southern States.” Journal of Politics57 (2): 384–401.
42.
HowellSusan E.FaganDeborah. 1988. “Race and Trust in Government: Testing the Political Reality Model.” Public Opinion Quarterly52 (3): 343–50.
43.
HutchingsVincent L.McClerkingHarwood K.CharlesGuy-Uriel. 2004. “Congressional Representation of Black Interests: Recognizing the Importance of Stability.” Journal of Politics66 (2): 450–68.
44.
JewellMalcolm E.1982. Representation in State Legislatures. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.
45.
KnollBenjamin R.2009. “Amigo de la Raza? Reexamining Determinants of Latino Support in the U.S. Congress.” Social Science Quarterly90 (1): 179–95.
46.
LaxJeffrey R.PhillipsJustin H.2011. “The Democratic Deficit in the States.” American Journal of Political Science56 (1): 148–66.
47.
LongSamuel. 1978. “Personality and Political Alienation among White and Black Youth: A Test of the Social Deprivation Model.” Journal of Politics40 (2): 433–57.
48.
LublinDavid L.1997. The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests in Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
49.
MayhewDavid R.1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
50.
McClainPaula D.StewartJosephJr.2010. Can We All Get Along? Racial and Ethnic Minorities in American Politics. 5th ed.Boulder: Westview.
51.
McKeeSeth C.2008. “The Effects of Redistricting on Voting Behavior in Incumbent U.S. House Elections, 1992–1994.” Political Research Quarterly61 (1): 122–33.
52.
MillerWarren E.StokesDonald E.1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review57 (1): 45–56.
53.
MintaMichael D.2011. Oversight: Representing the Interests of Blacks and Latinos in Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
54.
PantojaAdrian D.SeguraGary M.2003. “Does Ethnicity Matter? Descriptive Representation in Legislatures and Political Alienation among Latinos.” Social Science Quarterly84 (2): 441–60.
55.
PitkinHanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
56.
PolsbyNelson W.GallaherMiriamRundquistBarry S.1969. “The Growth of the Seniority System in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review63 (3): 787–807.
57.
PrimoDavid M.JacobsmeierMatthew L.MilyoJeffrey. 2007. “Estimating the Impact of State Policies and Institutions with Mixed-Level Data.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly7 (4): 446–59.
58.
Rabe-HeskethSophiaSkrondalAnders. 2008. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. 2nd ed.College Station, TX: Stata Press.
59.
RodgersHarrell R.1974. “Toward an Explanation of the Political Efficacy and Political Cynicism of Black Adolescents: An Exploratory Study.” American Journal of Political Science18 (2): 257–82.
60.
RosenstoneSteven J.HansenJohn Mark. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
61.
SanchezGabriel R.MorinJason L.2011. “The Effect of Descriptive Representation on Latinos’ Views of Government and of Themselves.” Social Science Quarterly92 (2): 483–508.
62.
SteenbergenMarco R.JonesBradford S.2002. “Modeling Multilevel Data Structures.” American Journal of Political Science46 (1): 218–37.
63.
SullivanJohn L.1973. “Political Correlates of Social, Economic and Religious Diversity in the American States.” Journal of Politics35 (1): 70–84.
64.
SwainCarol. 1993. Black Faces, Black Interests: The Representation of African Americans in Congress. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
65.
TajfelHenriBilligMichael G.BundyRobert P.FlamentClaude. 1971. “Social Categorization and Intergroup Behaviour.” European Journal of Social Psychology1 (2): 149–77.
66.
TateKatherine. 2003. Black Faces in the Mirror: African Americans and Their Representatives in the U.S. Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
67.
TateKatherine. 2010. What’s Going On? Political Incorporation and the Transformation of Black Public Opinion. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
68.
TurnerJohn C.1985. “Social Categorization and the Self-Concept: A Social Cognitive Theory of Group Behavior.” In Advances in Group Processes. Vol. 2, edited by LawlerEdward J., 77–121. New York: JAI Press.
69.
TurnerJohn C.HoggMichael A.OakesPenelope J.ReicherStephen D.WetherellMargaret S.1987. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
70.
VerbaSidneySchlozmanKay L.BradyHenry E.1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
71.
WeissbergRobert. 1978. “Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress.” American Political Science Review72 (2): 535–47.
72.
WhitbyKenny J.1997. The Color of Representation: Congressional Behavior and Black Interests. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
WilsonWalter. 2010. “Descriptive Representation and Latino Interest Bill Sponsorship in Congress.” Social Science Quarterly91 (4): 1043–62.
75.
WolfingerRaymond E.HeifetzJoan. 1965. “Safe Seats, Seniority, and Power in Congress.” American Political Science Review59 (2): 337–49.
76.
YoungIris M.2000. Inclusion and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
