This study demonstrates that district magnitude (the number of officials elected from an electoral district) affects the behavioral choices and policymaking contributions of legislators. We theorize that legislators elected from districts of larger magnitudes focus much of their efforts on relatively low-cost, high-visibility activities that allow for easy credit claiming, while their colleagues from lower magnitude districts focus more on relatively high-cost, low-visibility work required to move policy proposals through the legislative process. We test our hypotheses using data recording the legislative activities of members of the Maryland House of Delegates, which elects its member from districts of different magnitudes. The results, which are mostly supportive, have implications for the impact of institutional structures on representation and policymaking.
AdamsGreg D.1996. “Legislative Effects of Single-Member vs. Multi-member Districts.” American Journal of Political Science40 (1): 129–44.
2.
AdlerE. ScottWilkersonJohn D.2013. Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AlvarezR. MichaelSavingJason L.1997. “Deficits, Democrats, and Distributive Benefits: Congressional Elections and the Pork Barrel in the 1980s.” Political Research Quarterly50 (4): 809–31.
4.
AndersonWilliam D.Box-SteffensmeierJanet M.Sinclair-ChapmanValeria. 2003. “The Keys to Legislative Success in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly28 (3): 357–86.
5.
AshworthScottBueno De MesquitaEthan. 2006. “Delivering the Goods: Legislative Particularism in Different Electoral and Institutional Settings.” Journal of Politics68 (1): 168–79.
6.
BagashkaTanyaClarkJennifer. 2016. “Electoral Rules and Legislative Particularism: Evidence from U.S. State Legislatures.” American Political Science Review110 (3): 441–56.
7.
BarnesTiffany D.2016. Gendering Legislative Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BickersKenneth N.SteinRobert M.1996. “The Electoral Dynamics of the Federal Political Pork Barrel.” American Journal of Political Science41 (4): 397–421.
9.
BinderSarah A.1999. “The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock.” American Political Science Review93 (3): 519–33.
10.
BowlingCynthia J.FergusonMargaret R.2001. “Divided Government, Interest Representation, and Policy Differences: Competing Explanations of Gridlock in the Fifty States.” Journal of Politics63 (1): 182–206.
11.
BrattonKathleen A.2005. “Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State Legislatures.” Politics & Gender1 (1): 97–125.
12.
BrattonKathleen A.HaynieKerry L.1999. “Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race.” Journal of Politics61 (3): 658–79.
13.
BrattonKathleen A.RouseStella M.2011. “Networks in the Legislative Arena: How Group Dynamics Affect Cosponsorship.” Legislative Studies Quarterly36 (3): 423–60.
14.
BrownNadia E.2014. Sisters in the Statehouse: Black Women and Legislative Decision Making. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
CaliendoMarcoKopeinigSabine. 2008. “Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching.” Journal of Economic Surveys22 (1): 31–72.
16.
CampbellJames E.1982. “Cosponsoring Legislation in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly7 (3): 415–22.
17.
CareyJohn M.HixSimon. 2011. “The Electoral Sweet Spot: Low-Magnitude Proportional Electoral Systems.” American Journal of Political Science55 (2): 383–97.
18.
CareyJohn M.NiemiRichard G.PowellLynda. 2000. Term Limits in the State Legislatures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
19.
CareyJohn M.NiemiRichard G.PowellLynda W.MoncriefGary F.2006. “The Effects of Term Limits on State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly31 (1): 105–34.
20.
CoxGary W.1999. “Electoral Rules and Electoral Coordination.” Annual Review of Political Science2 (1): 145–61.
21.
CoxGary W.MorgensternScott. 1995. “The Incumbency Advantage in Multimember Districts: Evidence from the U.S. States.” Legislative Studies Quarterly20 (3): 329–49.
22.
CoxGary W.TerryWilliam C.2008. “Legislative Productivity in the 93d–105th Congresses.” Legislative Studies Quarterly33 (4): 603–18.
23.
CurryJames M.HerrnsonPaul S.TaylorJeffrey A.2013. “The Impact of District Magnitude on Campaign Fundraising.” Legislative Studies Quarterly38 (4): 517–43.
24.
DauerManning J.1966. “Multi-member Districts in Dade County: Study of a Problem and a Delegation.” Journal of Politics28 (3): 617–38.
25.
EastonDavid. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
26.
EngstromRichardMcDonaldMichael. 1993. “‘Enhancing’ Factors in At-Large Plurality and Majority Systems: A Reconsideration.” Electoral Studies12:385–401.
27.
FennoRichard. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.
28.
FowlerJames H.2006. “Connecting the Congress.” Political Analysis14 (4): 456–87.
29.
GrimmerJustinMessingSolomonWestwoodSean J.2015. The Impression of Influence: Legislator Communication, Representation, and Democratic Accountability. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
30.
GroseChristian R.2011. Congress in Black and White: Race and Representation in Washington and at Home. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
HallRichard L.1996. Participation in Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press.
32.
HammKeith E.HarmelRobertThompsonRobert J.1981. “Impacts of Districting Change on Voting Cohesion and Representation.” Journal of Politics43 (2): 544–55.
33.
HawkesworthMary. 2003. “Congressional Enactments of Race-Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced-Gendered Institutions.” American Political Science Review97 (4): 529–50.
HeckmanJames J.IchimuraHidehikoToddPetra. 1998. “Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator.” Review of Economic Studies65 (2): 261–94.
36.
HerrnsonPaul S.TaylorJeffrey A.CurryJames M.2015. “The Impact of District Magnitude on Ballot Drop-Off and Roll-Off.” Legislative Studies Quarterly40 (4): 627–50.
37.
HightonBenjaminRoccaMichael S.2005. “Beyond the Roll-Call Arena: The Determinants of Position Taking in Congress.” Political Research Quarterly58 (2): 303–16.
38.
HiranoShiegoSnyderJames M.2009. “Using Multi-member District Elections to Estimate the Sources of the Incumbency Advantage.” American Journal of Political Science53 (2): 292–306.
39.
HolbrookThomas M.TidmarchCharles M.1991. “Sophomore Surge in State Legislative Elections, 1968-86.” Legislative Studies Quarterly16 (1): 49–63.
40.
JewellMalcolm E.BreauxDavid. 1991. “Southern Primary and Electoral Competition and Incumbent Success.” Legislative Studies Quarterly16 (1): 129–43.
41.
KirklandJustin H.2011. “The Relational Determinants of Legislative Outcomes: Strong and Weak Ties between Legislators.” Journal of Politics73 (3): 887–98.
42.
KirklandJustin H.2012. “Multimember Districts’ Effect on Collaboration between U.S. State Legislators.” Legislative Studies Quarterly37 (3): 329–53.
43.
KirklandJustin H.2014. “Chamber Size Effects on the Collaborative Structure of Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly39 (2): 169–98.
44.
KogerGregory. 2003. “Position Taking and Cosponsorship in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly28 (2): 225–46.
45.
LaaksoMarkuTaageperaRein. 1979. “The ‘Effective’ Number of Parties.” Comparative Political Studies12 (1): 3–27.
46.
LangbeinLaura I.SigelmanLee. 1989. “Show Horses, Work Horses, and Dead Horses.” American Politics Research17 (1): 80–95.
47.
LazarusJeffrey. 2013. “Issue Salience and Bill Introduction in the House and Senate.” Congress & the Presidency40 (3): 215–29.
48.
LeeFrances E.2009. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
LevittSteven D.SnyderJames M.1997. “The Impact of Federal Spending on House Election Outcomes.” Journal of Political Economy105 (1): 30–53.
50.
MaestasCherie D.2000. “Professional Legislatures and Ambitious Politicians: Policy Responsiveness of State Institutions.” Legislative Studies Quarterly25 (4): 663–90.
51.
MatthewsDonald R.1959. “The Folkways of the United States Senate: Conformity to Group Norms and Legislative Effectiveness.” American Political Science Review53 (4): 1064–89.
52.
MayhewDavid R.1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
53.
MayhewDavid R.2005. Divided We Govern. New Haven: Yale University Press.
54.
MintaMichael D.2011. Oversight: Representing the Interests of Blacks and Latinos in Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
NiemiRichard G.JackmanSimonWinskyLaura R.1991. “Candidacies and Competitiveness in Multimember Districts.” Legislative Studies Quarterly16 (1): 91–109.
57.
NiemiRichard G.WinskyLaura R.1987. “Membership Turnover in U.S. State Legislatures: Trends and Effects of Districting.” Legislative Studies Quarterly12 (1): 115–23.
58.
PayneJames L.1980. “Show Horses & Work Horses in the United States House of Representatives.” Polity12 (3): 428–56.
59.
PitkinHanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
60.
RichardsonLilliard E.RussellBrian E.CooperChristopher A.2004. “Legislative Representation in a Single-Member versus Multiple-Member District System: The Arizona State Legislature.” Political Research Quarterly57 (2): 337–44.
61.
RoccaMichael S.GordonStacy B.2010. “The Position-Taking Value of Bill Sponsorship in Congress.” Political Research Quarterly63 (2): 387–97.
62.
RoccaMichael S.SanchezGabriel R.2008. “The Effect of Race and Ethnicity on Bill Sponsorship and Cosponsorship in Congress.” American Politics Research36 (1): 130–52.
63.
RouseStella M.2013. Latinos in the Legislative Process: Interests and Influence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
64.
SnyderJames M.UedaMichiko. 2007. “Do Multimember Districts Lead to Free-Riding?” Legislative Studies Quarterly32 (4): 649–79.
65.
SquirePeverill. 2000. “Uncontested Seats in State Legislative Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly25 (1): 131–46.
66.
SquirePeverill. 2007. “Measuring State Legislative Professionalism: The Squire Index Revisited.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly7 (2): 211–27.
67.
StimsonJames A.MackuenMichael B.EriksonRobert S.1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review89 (3): 543–65.
68.
Tam ChoWendy K.FowlerJames H.2010. “Legislative Success in a Small World: Social Network Analysis and the Dynamics of Congressional Legislation.” Journal of Politics72 (1): 124–35.
69.
TateKatherine. 2003. Black Faces in the Mirror: African Americans and Their Representatives in the U.S. Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
70.
TrounstineJessicaValdiniMelody E.2008. “The Context Matters: The Effects of Single-Member versus At-Large Districts on City Council Diversity.” American Journal of Political Science52 (3): 554–69.
71.
VoldenCraigWisemanAlan E.WittmerDana. 2013. “When Are Women More Effective Lawmakers than Men?” American Journal of Political Science57 (2): 326–41.
72.
WeberRonald E.TuckerHarvey J.BracePaul. 1991. “Vanishing Marginals in State Legislative Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly16 (1): 29–47.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
