Despite the growing body of scholarship urging congressional scholars to consider the racialization of Congress, little attention has been given to understanding how racial resentment impacts legislative behavior. To fill this gap, we ask if and how racial resentment within a member’s home district influences the positions she takes on racially tinged issues in her press releases. Due to constituent influence, we expect legislators from districts with high levels of racial resentment to issue racially tinged press releases. Through an automated content analysis of more than fifty four thousand press releases from almost four hundred U.S. House members in the 114th Congress (2015–2017), we show that Republicans from districts with high levels of racial resentment are more likely to issue press releases that attack President Barack Obama. In contrast, we find no evidence of racial resentment being positively associated with another prominent Democratic white elected official, Hillary Clinton. Our results suggest that one reason Congress may remain racially conservative even as representatives’ cycle out of office may be attributed to the electoral process.
AchenChristopher H.1978. “Measuring Representation.” American Journal of Political Science22:475–510.
2.
BarberáPabloBoydstunAmberLinnSuzannaMcMahonRyanNaglerJonathan. 2016. “Methodological Challenges in Estimating Tone: Application to News Coverage of the U.S. Economy.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, August26.
3.
BartelsLarry M.1991. “Constituency Opinion and Congressional Policy Making: The Reagan Defense Buildup.” American Political Science Review85 (2): 457–74.
4.
BennettW. Lance. 1990. “Toward a Theory of Press-state Relations in the United States.” Journal of Communication40 (2): 103–25.
5.
BishinBenjamin. 2009. Tyranny of the Minority: The Subconstituency Politics Theory of Representation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
6.
BonicaAdam. 2014. “Mapping the Ideological Market Place.” American Journal of Political Science58 (2): 367–86.
7.
CanonDavid T. Race. 1999. Redistricting, and representation: The unintended consequences of black majority districts. University of Chicago Press.
8.
CarminesEdward G.StimsonJames A. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9.
CitrinJ.LevyM.WongC.J.2017. Politics and the English Language in California: Bilingual Education at the Polls. California Journal of Politics and Policy, 9(2).
10.
CoeKevinReitzesMichael. 2010. “Obama on the Stump: Features and Determinants of a Rhetorical Approach.” Presidential Studies Quarterly40 (3): 391–413.
11.
CollingwoodLorenWilkersonJohn. 2012. “Tradeoffs in Accuracy and Efficiency in Supervised Learning Methods.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics9 (3): 298–318.
12.
CormackLindsey. 2016. “Extremity in Congress: Communications versus Votes.” Legislative Studies Quarterly41 (3): 575–603.
13.
DavidsonRoger H.OleszekWalter J.LeeFrances E.SchicklerEric. 2013. Congress and Its Members. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
14.
EdsallThomas ByrneEdsallMary D. 1992. Chain Reaction: The Impact of Race, Rights, and Taxes on American Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.
15.
ElderLaurelFrederickBrianBurrellBarbara. 2018. “Hillary Clinton versus Barbara Bush: Tradition Meets Change in the 1992 Presidential Campaign.” In American Presidential Candidate Spouses, edited by ElderLaurelFrederickBrianBurrellBarbara, 51–77. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
EriksonRobert S.1978. “Constituency Opinion and Congressional Behavior: A Reexamination of the Miller-Stokes Representation Data.” American Journal of Political Science22: 511–35.
17.
FennoRichard. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. New York: Longman Classics Edition.
GibbonsChrisRichardsSuzanneValderasJose MariaCampbellJohn. 2017. “Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms Can Classify Open-text Feedback of Doctor Performance with Human-level Accuracy.” Journal of Medical Internet Research19 (3): e65.
20.
GilensMartin. 1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
21.
GillionDaniel. 2016. Governing with Words: The Political Dialogue on Race, Public Policy, and Inequality in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
GrimmerJustin. 2013. Representational Style in Congress: What Legislators Say and Why It Matters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
GrimmerJustinStewartBrandon M. 2013. “Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts.” Political Analysis21 (3): 267–97.
24.
HallRichard L.1996. Participation in Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press.
25.
HawkesworthMary. 2003. “Congressional enactments of race–gender: Toward a theory of raced–gendered institutions.”American Political Science Review97 (4): 529-550.
26.
HeberligEric S.LarsonBruce A. 2011. “Redistributing Campaign Funds by U.S. House Members: The Spiraling Costs of the Permanent Campaign.” Legislative Studies Quarterly30 (4): 597–624.
27.
HutchingsVincent L.2009. “Change or More of the Same? Evaluating Racial Attitudes in the Obama Era.” Public Opinion Quarterly73 (5): 917–42.
28.
JurkaTimothy P.CollingwoodLorenBoydstunAmber E.GrossmanEmilianoAtteveldtWouter van. 2013. “RTextTools: A Supervised Learning Package for Text Classification.” The R Journal5 (1): 6–12.
29.
KeyValdimer O.1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
30.
KinderDonald R.Dale-RiddleAllison. 2012. The End of Race? Obama, 2008, and Racial Politics in America. New Haven: Yale University Press.
31.
KinderDonald R.SandersLynn. 1996. Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.
32.
KinderDonald R.SearsDavid O. 1981. “Prejudice and Politics: Symbolic Racism versus Racial Threats to the Good Life.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology40 (3): 414–31.
33.
KingDesmondSmithRogers. 2005. “Racial Orders in American Political Development.” American Political Science Review99 (1): 75–92.
34.
KingdonJohn W.1978. Congressmen’s Voting Decisions. New York: Harper & Row.
35.
KingdonJohn W.1989. Congressmen’s voting decisions. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
36.
LenzGabriel S.2009. “Learning and Opinion Change, Not Priming: Reconsidering the Evidence for the Priming Hypothesis.” American Journal of Political Science53 (4): 821–37.
37.
LevenduskyMatthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
38.
LipinskiDaniel. 2004. Congressional Communication. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
39.
LoomisBurdett A.SchillerWendy J. 2018. The Contemporary Congress. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
40.
LoperEdwardBirdSteven. 2002. “NLTK: The Natural Language Toolkit.” Proceedings of the ACL-02 Workshop on Effective Tools and Methodologies for Teaching Natural Language Processing and Computational Linguistics-Volume 1, Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, July 1.
41.
LopezIan Haney. 2014. Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented Racism and Wrecked the Middle Class. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
MayerJeremy D.2002. Running on Race: Racial Politics in Presidential Campaigns, 1960-2000. New York: Random House.
43.
MayhewDavid. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
44.
McCartyNolanPooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge: MIT Press.
45.
MendelbergTali. 2001. The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
46.
MilitaKerriRyanJohn BarrySimasElizabeth N. 2014. “Nothing to Hide, Nowhere to Run, or Nothing to Lose: Candidate Position-taking in Congressional Elections.” Political Behavior36 (2): 427–49.
47.
MillerWarren E.StokesDonald E. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review57:45–56.
48.
NtetaTatishe M.TarsiMelinda R. 2016. “Self-selection versus Socialization Revisited: Military Service, Racial Resentment, and Generational Membership.” Armed Forces & Society42 (2): 362–85.
49.
OrnsteinNormanMannThomas. 2000. The Permanent Campaign and Its Future. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute; Brookings Institution.
50.
PageBenjamin I.ShapiroRobert Y.GronkePaul W.RosenbergRobert M. 1984. “Constituency, Party, and Representation in Congress.” Public Opinion Quarterly48:741–56.
51.
ParkerChristopher Sebastian. 2016. “Race and Politics in the Age of Obama.” Annual Review of Sociology42:217–30.
52.
ParkerChristopher SebastianBarretoMatt. 2012. Will the Real Americans Please Stand up? The Tea Party and Contemporary Right-wing Extremism in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
PistonSpencer. 2010. “How Explicit Racial Prejudice Hurt Obama in the 2008 Election.” Political Behavior32:431–45.
55.
SchaffnerBrian F.2006. “Local News Coverage and the Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly31 (4): 491–511.
56.
SearsDavid O.1993. “Symbolic Politics: A Socio-psychological Theory.” In Explorations in Political Psychology, edited by IyengarShantoMcGuireWilliam J., 113–49. Durham: Duke University Press.
57.
SidesJohnTeslerMichaelVavreckLynn. 2017. “The 2016 U.S. Election: How Trump Lost and Won.” Journal of Democracy28 (2): 34–44.
58.
TateKatherine. 2003. Black faces in the mirror: African Americans and their representatives in the US Congress. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
59.
TeslerMichael. 2012. “The Spillover of Racialization into Health Care: How President Obama Polarized Public Opinion by Racial Attitudes and Race.” American Journal of Political Science56 (3): 690–704.
60.
TeslerMichael. 2016. Post-racial or Most-racial? Race and Politics in the Obama Era. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
61.
TeslerMichaelSearsDavid O. 2010. Obama’s Race: The 2008 Election and the Dream of a Post-racial America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
62.
Tyson VanessaC.2016. Twists of Fate: Multiracial Coalitions and Minority Representation in the US House of Representatives. England: Oxford University Press.
63.
ValentinoNicholas A.HutchingsVincent L.WhiteIsmail K. 2002. “Cues that Matter: How Political Ads Prime Racial Attitudes during Campaigns.” American Political Science Review96 (1): 75–90.
64.
VinsonDanielle C.2003. Local Media Coverage of Congress and Its Members: Through Local Eyes. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
65.
WhiteIsmail K.2007. “When Race Matters and When it Doesn’t: Racial Group Differences in Response to Racial Cues.” American Political Science Review101 (2): 339–54.
66.
WinterNicholas. 2008. Dangerous Frames: How Ideas about Race and Gender Shape Public Opinion. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
