Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Losing elections is a political reality for most candidates. While much fanfare was made of the historic number of women who won in 2018, three times as many women ran and lost. And although we know much about the reasons that motivate women to run in the first, far less is known about the decision-making processes of women who lose and run again. How do women who were once motivated rebound for another campaign and election? We address this question, working with a unique, exploratory data set of interviews with women who ran for Congress in 2018 and lost. Our analysis offers some important insights on how women who rebound think about their loss, and their decision-making processes. We find compelling evidence that women’s paths to office continue to differ from men’s, reminding us of the shortcomings of a one-size-fits-all model for candidate emergence or reemergence. We conclude with the foundation of a gendered theory of electoral persistence.

Keywords

candidate persistence women candidates congressional elections

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bledsoe

Timothy

Herring

Mary

. 1990. “Victims of Circumstances: Women in Pursuit of Political Office.” American Political Science Review 84 (1): 213–23.

Buser

Thomas

. 2016. “The Impact of Losing in a Competition on the Willingness to Seek Further Challenges.” Management Science 62 (12): 3439–49.

Carew

Jessica D. Johnson

. 2016. “How Do You See Me? Stereotyping of Black Women and How It Affects Them in an Electoral Context.” In Distinct Identities, 111–31.

Carroll

Susan J.

1985. Women as Candidates in American Politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Carroll

Susan J.

Sanbonmatsu

Kira

. 2013. More Women Can Run: Gender and Pathways to the State Legislatures, edited by Brown

Nadia

Gershon

Sarah Allen

. New York: Oxford University Press; Taylor and Francis Publishing.

Carsey

Thomas M.

Berry

William D.

Forrest

Walter

2003. “‘If At First You Don’t Succeed...’: Repeat Challengers in State Legislative Elections.” Paper presented at the Third Annual State Politics and Policy Conference, Tucson, AZ.

Costantini

Edmond

. 1990. “Political Women and Political Ambition: Closing the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (3): 741–70.

Doherty

David

Dowling

Conor M.

Miller

Michael G.

2019. “Do Local Party Chairs Think Women and Minority Candidates Can Win? Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment.” The Journal of Politics 814: 1282–97.

Fox

Richard L.

Lawless

Jennifer L.

2004. “Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to Run for Office.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 264–80.

10.

Fox

Richard L.

Lawless

Jennifer L.

2011. “Gendered Perceptions and Political Candidacies: A Central Barrier to Women’s Equality in Electoral Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (1): 59–73.

11.

Fulton

Sarah A.

Maestas

Cherie D.

Maisel

L. Sandy

Stone

Walter J.

2006. “The Sense of a Woman: Gender, Ambition, and the Decision to Run for Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (2): 235–48.

12.

Gill

David

Prowse

Victoria

. 2014. “Gender Differences and Dynamics in Competition: The Role of Luck.” Quantitative Economics 5 (2): 351–76.

13.

Jacobson

Gary C.

Kernell

Samuel

. 1983. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.

14.

Palmer

Barbara

Simon

Dennis Michael

. 2012. Women and Congressional Elections: A Century of Change. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

15.

Pearson

Kathryn

McGhee

Eric

. 2013. “What It Takes to Win: Questioning ‘Gender Neutral’ Outcomes in U.S. House Elections.” Politics & Gender 9 (4): 439–62.

16.

Schneider

Monica C.

Holman

Mirya R.

Diekman

Amanda B.

McAndrew

Thomas

. 2016. “Power, Conflict, and Community: How Gendered Views of Political Power Influence Women’s Political Ambition.” Political Psychology 37 (4): 515–31.

17.

Silva

Andrea

Skulley

Carrie

. 2019. “Always Running: Candidate Emergence among Women of Color over Time.” Political Research Quarterly 72:342–359.

18.

Stripp

Semilla B.

2019. “The Purple Wave: Gender and Electoral Outcomes in the 2018 Midterms.” Macalester College Political Science Honors Projects. https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/poli_honors/79/.

19.

Taylor

Andrew J.

Boatright

Robert G.

2005. “The Personal and the Political in Repeat Congressional Candidacies.” Political Research Quarterly 58 (4): 599–607.

20.

Thomsen

Danielle M.

2018. “Gender Differences in Candidate Reemergence.” Boston. https://daniellethomsen.files.wordpress.com/2019/08/thomsen_apsa2018.pdf.

21.

Vallejo

Agustin

. 2019. “Nevertheless, She Persisted? Gender Differences in the Effect of Losing an Election on Political Ambition.” Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

22.

Wasserman

Melanie

. 2018. Gender Differences in Politician Persistence. SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3370587.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.14 MB