Menacing news inclines individuals to acquire information, and research has explored how emotional reactions such as fear or anger condition this process. While scholars have debated the relevance of fear and anger for levels of attentiveness and learning in politics, fewer studies consider how variation in emotional responses can shape the substance of information searches in times of threat. We posit that heightened fear motivates interest in defense-oriented information among threatened individuals, while heightened anger motivates interest in aggression-oriented information. To test these hypotheses, we focus on international terrorist threat because of its known tendency to elevate both anger and fear. We use data that permit a behavioral measure of information seeking, via an experiment embedded within a Dynamic Process Tracing Environment (DPTE) platform. Within this information-rich context, exposure to terrorist threat motivates a search for relevant information. Furthermore, we find that while an induction to elevate anger prompts more immediate attention to aggression-oriented information, an induction to elevate fear is more effective in steering attention toward defense-oriented information.
AarøeLenePetersenMichael BangArceneauxKevin. 2017. “The Behavioral Immune System Shapes Political Intuitions: Why and How Individual Differences in Disgust Sensitivity Underlie Opposition to Immigration.” American Political Science Review111 (2): 277–94.
2.
AbelsonRobert P.KinderDonald R.PetersMark D.FiskeSusan T.1982. “Affective and Semantic Components in Political Person Perception.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology42 (4): 619–30.
3.
AlbertsonBethanyGadarianShana K.2015. Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Bang PetersenMichael. 2010. “Distinct Emotions, Distinct Domains: Anger, Anxiety and Perceptions of Intentionality.” The Journal of Politics72 (2): 357–65.
5.
BanksAntoine J.HicksHeather M.2015. “Fear and Implicit Racism: Whites’ Support for Voter ID Laws.” Political Psychology37 (5): 641–58.
6.
BraderTed. 2006. Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
7.
BraderTedMarcusGeorge E.MillerKristin L.2011. “Emotion and Public Opinion.” In The Oxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and the Media, edited by EdwardsGeorge C.JacobsLawrence R.ShapiroRobert Y., 384–401. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
CarverCharles S.2004. “Negative Affects Deriving from the Behavioral Approach System.” Emotion4 (1): 3–22.
9.
CarverCharles S.Harmon-JonesEddie. 2009. “Anger Is an Approach-Related Affect: Evidence and Implications.” Psychological Bulletin135 (2): 183–204.
10.
DruckmanJames N.2001. “The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence.” Political Behavior23 (3): 225–56.
11.
EckhardtChristopher I.CohenDale J.1997. “Attention to Anger-Relevant and Irrelevant Stimuli following Naturalistic Insult.” Personality and Individual Differences23 (4): 619–29.
12.
EllsworthPhoebe C.SmithCraig A.1988. “From Appraisal to Emotion: Differences among Unpleasant Feelings.” Motivation and Emotion12 (3): 271–302.
13.
FiskKerstinMerollaJennifer L.RamosJennifer M.2018. “Emotions, Terrorist Threat, and Drones: Anger Drives Support for Drone Strikes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution63 (4): 976–1000.
14.
FrijdaNico H.1987. The Emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
HallTodd H.2011. “We Will Not Swallow This Bitter Fruit: Theorizing a Diplomacy of Anger.” Journal of Security Studies4 (20): 521–55.
16.
HallTodd H.RossAndrew G.2015. “Affective Politics after 9/11.” International Organization69:847–79.
17.
HansenChristine H.HansenRanald D.1988. “Finding the Face in the Crowd: An Anger Superiority Effect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology54 (6): 917–24.
18.
Harmon-JonesEddieHarmon-JonesCindyAbramsonLynPetersonCarly K.2009. “PANAS Positive Activation Is Associated with Anger.” Emotion9 (2): 183–96.
19.
HuddyLeonieFeldmanStanleyCasseseErin. 2007. “On the Distinct Political Effects of Anxiety and Anger.” In The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, edited by NeumanW. RussellMarcusGeorge E.CriglerAnnMacKuenMichael, 202–30. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
20.
ImbensGuido W.RubinDonald B.2015. Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
KamCindy D.EstesBeth A.2016. “Disgust Sensitivity and the Demand for Public Protection.” Journal of Politics78 (2): 481–96.
22.
KeltnerDacherEllsworthPhoebe C.EdwardsKari. 1993. “Beyond Simple Pessimism: Effects of Sadness and Anger on Social Perception.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology64 (5): 740–52.
23.
LauRichard R.RedlawskDavid P.2006. How Voters Decide: Information Processing during Election Campaigns. Cambridge University Press.
24.
LazarusRichard S.1991. “Progress on a Cognitive-Motivational-Relational Theory of Emotion.” American Psychologist46 (8): 819–34.
25.
LernerJennifer S.GoldbergJulie H.TetlockPhilip E.1998. “Sober Second Thought: The Effects of Accountability, Anger, and Authoritarianism on Attributions of Responsibility.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin24 (6): 563–74.
26.
LernerJennifer S.GonzalezRoxana M.SmallDeborah A.FischhoffBaruch. 2003. “Effects of Fear and Anger on Perceived Risks of Terrorism: A National Field Experiment.” Psychological Science14 (2): 144–50.
27.
LernerJennifer S.KeltnerDacher. 2000. “Beyond Valence: Toward a Model of Emotion-Specific Influences on Judgment and Choice.” Cognition and Emotion14 (4): 473–93.
28.
LernerJennifer S.KeltnerDacher. 2001. “Fear, Anger, and Risk.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology81:146–59.
29.
MacKuenMichaelWolakJenniferKeeleLukeMarcusGeorge E.2010. “Civic Engagements: Resolute Partisanship or Reflective Deliberation.” American Journal of Political Science54:440–58.
30.
MacLeodColinMathewsAndrew. 1988. “Anxiety and the Allocation of Attention to Threat.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology40 (4): 653–70.
31.
MarcusGeorge E.MacKuenMichael B.1993. “Anxiety, Enthusiasm and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement during Presidential Campaigns.” American Political Science Review87:672–85.
32.
MarcusGeorge E.MacKuenMichael B.NeumanRussell. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
33.
MarcusGeorge E.MacKuenMichael B.WolakJenniferKeeleLuke. 2006. “The Measure and Mismeasure of Emotion.” In Feeling Politics: Emotion in Political Information Processing, edited by RedlawskDavid, 31–46. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
MerollaJennifer L.ZechmeisterElizabeth J.2009. Democracy at Risk: How Terrorist Threats Affect the Public. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
35.
MerollaJennifer L.ZechmeisterElizabeth J.2018. “Threat and Information Acquisition: Evidence from an Eight Country Study.” Journal of Experimental Political Science5 (3): 167–81.
36.
NabiRobin L.2002. “The Theoretical versus the Lay Meaning of Disgust: Implications for Emotion Research.” Cognition & Emotion16 (5): 695–703.
37.
NabiRobin L.2003. “Exploring the Framing Effects of Emotion: Do Discrete Emotions Differentially Influence Information Accessibility, Information Seeking, and Policy Preference?” Communication Research30 (2): 224–47.
38.
RyanTimothy J.2012. “What Makes Us Click? Demonstrating Incentives for Angry Discourse with Digital-Age Field Experiments.” The Journal of Politics74 (4): 1138–52.
39.
SchuppHarald T.CuthbertBruce N.BradleyMargaret M.HillmanCharles H.HammAlfons O.LangPeter. 2004. “Brain Processes in Emotional Perception: Motivated Attention.” Cognition and Emotion18 (5): 593–611.
40.
SmallDeborah A.LernerJennifer S.FischhoffBaruch. 2006. “Emotion Priming and Attributions for Terrorism: Americans’ Reactions in a National Field Experiment.” Political Psychology27 (2): 289–98.
41.
SmithCraig A.EllsworthPhoebe C.1985. “Patterns of Cognitive Appraisal in Emotion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology48 (4): 813–38.
42.
SmithPaulWatermanMitch. 2003. “Processing Bias for Aggression Words in Forensic and Nonforensic Samples.” Cognition and Emotion17 (5): 681–701.
43.
SteimerThierry. 2002. “The Biology of Fear- and Anxiety-Related Behaviors.” Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience4:231–50.
44.
SteinJanice G.2013. “Threat Perception in International Relations.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, edited by HuddyLeonieSearsDavid O.LevyJack S., 364–94. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
TavrisCarol. 1989. Anger: The Misunderstood Emotion. New York: Simon & Schuster.
46.
TiedensLarissa Z.LintonSusan. 2001. “Judgment under Emotional Certainty and Uncertainty: The Effects of Specific Emotions on Information Processing.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology81:973–88.
47.
TyburJoshua M.LiebermanDebraKurzbanRobertDeScioliPeter. 2012. “Disgust: Evolved Function and Structure.” Psychological Review120 (1): 65–84.
48.
ValentinoNicholas A.BanksAntoine J.HutchingsVincent L.DavisAnne K.2008. “Is a Worried Citizen a Good Citizen? Emotions, Political Information Seek and Learning via the Internet.” Political Psychology29 (2): 247–73.
49.
ValentinoNicholas A.BraderTedGroenendykEric W.GregorowiczKryshaHutchingsVincent L.2011. “Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation.” Journal of Politics73 (1): 156–70.
50.
WatsonDavidClarkLee A.TellegenAuke. 1988. “Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology54:1063–70.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
