Scholars of gender and race have long acknowledged the importance that descriptive representation plays for marginalized groups, if not substantively than symbolically. Yet, as candidate pools diversify to better reflect the population, it becomes less clear which among intersecting and overlapping identities will matter and how. Employing data from the 2016 Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey, we explore the association between minority voters’ sense of linked fate and their beliefs about candidates who share (or do not share) their gender and racial identities. Using this timely and unique data, collected immediately after the 2016 election when race and gender were of particular salience, we examine whether shared racial and gender identity is associated with Black and Latina/o voters’ beliefs about how well different candidates will represent their interests. We conclude by discussing the implications of our research for the changing face of American political candidates and voters.
BarretoMatt A.Frasure-YokleyLorrieVargasEdward D.WongJanelle. 2018. “Best Practices in Collecting Online Data with Asian, Black, Latino, and White Respondents: Evidence from the 2016 Collaborative Multiracial Post-election Survey.” Politics, Groups, and Identities6 (1): 171–80. doi:10.1080/21565503.2017.1419433.
5.
BarretoMatt A.MasuokaNatalie. 2004. “Together They Become One: Examining the Predictors of Panethnic Group Consciousness among Asian Americans and Latinos.” Social Science Quarterly87 (5): 993–1011.
6.
BejaranoChristina E. 2013. The Latina Advantage: Gender, Race, and Political Success. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
7.
BejaranoChristina E.ManzanoSylviaMontoyaCeleste. 2011. “Tracking the Latino Gender Gap: Gender Attitudes across Sex, Borders, and Generations.” Politics & Gender7 (4): 521–49.
8.
BeltránCristina. 2010. The Trouble with Unity: Latino Politics and the Creation of Identity. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
BickfordSusan. 1997. “Anti-identity Politics: Feminism, Democracy, and the Complexities of Citizenship.” Hypatia12 (4): 111–31.
10.
BoboLawrenceGilliamFranklin D. 1990. “Race, Sociopolitical Participation, and Black Empowerment.” American Political Science Review84 (2): 377–93.
11.
BrownNadia. 2014. Sisters in the Statehouse: Black Women and Legislative Decision Making. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
CanonDavid T.1999. Race, Redistricting, and Representation: The Unintended Consequences of Black Majority Districts. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
13.
CapersJuree K.SmithCandis Watts. 2016. “Linked Fate at the Intersection of Race, Gender and Ethnicity.” In Distinct Identities: Minority Women in U.S. Politics, edited by BrownNadia E.GershonSarah Allen, 29–48. New York: Routledge.
14.
CasellasJason. 2010. Latino Representation in Sate Houses and Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
CasellasJasonWallaceSophia. 2014. “The Role of Race, Ethnicity, and Party on Attitudes toward Descriptive Repre-sentation.” American Politics Research43 (1): 144–69.
16.
CohenCathy J.1997. “Punks, Bulldaggers, and Welfare Queens: The Radical Potential of Queer Politics?” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies3:437–65.
17.
CohenCathy J.1999. The Boundaries of Blackness: AIDS and the Breakdown of Black Politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
18.
ColeElizabeth R.2008. “Coalitions as a Model for Inter-sectionality: From Practice to Theory.” Sex Roles59 (5–6): 443–53.
19.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
20.
CrenshawKimberlé Williams. 1989. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics.” University of Chicago Legal Forum140:139–67.
21.
CrenshawKimberlé Williams. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review43 (6): 1241–99.
22.
DarityWilliam. 2005. “Interrogating Unstable Boundaries: An Introduction.” Review of Black Political Economy33 (2): 69–72.
23.
DavisFloyd J.1991. Who Is Black? One Nation’s Definition. University Park: Penn State University Press.
24.
DawsonMichael. 1994. Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
25.
EnglishAshleyPearsonKathrynStrolovitchDara. 2019. “Who Represents Me? Race, Gender, Partisan Congruence, and Representational Alternatives in a Polarized America.” Political Research Quarterly7 (2): 785–804.
26.
FragaLuisGarciaJohn A.HeroRodneyJones-CorreaMichaelMartinez-EbersValerieSeguraGary M. 2010. Latino Lives in America: Making It Home. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
27.
García BedollaLisa. 2005. Fluid Borders: Latino Power, Identity and Politics in Los Angeles. Berkeley: University of California Press.
28.
García BedollaLisa. 2007. “Intersections of Inequality: Understanding Marginalization and Privilege in the Post-Civil Rights Era.” Politics & Gender3 (2): 232–48.
29.
GayClaudineHochschildJenniferWhiteAriel. 2016. “Americans’ Belief in Linked Fate: Does the Measure Capture the Concept?” Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics1 (1): 117–44.
30.
GayClaudineTateKatherine. 1998. “Doubly Bound: The Impact of Gender and Race on the Politics of Black Women.” Political Psychology19 (1): 169–84.
31.
GershonSarah AllenMontoyaCelesteBejaranoChristinaBrownNadia. 2019. “Intersectional Linked Fate and Political Representation.” Politics, Groups, and Identities7 (3): 642–53.
32.
Golash-BozaTanya. 2006. “Dropping the Hyphen? Becoming Latino(a)-American through Racialized Assimilation.” Social Forces85 (1): 27–55.
33.
GreenwoodRonni M.2008. “Intersectional Political Consciousness: Appreciation for Intragroup Differences and Solidarity in Diverse Groups.” Psychology of Women Quarterly32:36–47.
34.
GrollmanEric Anthony. 2012. “Multiple Forms of Perceived Discrimination and Health among Adolescents and Young Adults.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior53:199–214.
35.
GroseChristian. 2011. Congress in Black and White. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
GurinPatriciaMillerArthur H.GurinGerald. 1980. “Stratum Identification and Consciousness.” Social Psychology Quarterly43:30–47.
37.
HancockAnge-Marie. 2007. “When Multiplication Doesn’t Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm.” Perspectives on Politics5 (1): 63–79.
38.
HarnoisCatherine. 2015. “Race, Ethnicity, Sexuality, and Women’s Political Consciousness of Gender.” Social Psychology Quarterly78 (4): 365–86.
39.
HeroRodney. 1992. Latinos and the U.S. Political System: Two-Tiered Pluralism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
40.
HochschildArlie. 2016. Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Rights. New York: The New Press.
41.
JonesJennifer. 2019. The Browning of the New South. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
42.
Jones-CorreaMichael. 2011. “Commonalities, Competition, and Linked Fate.” In Just Neighbors? Research on African American and Latino Relations in the United States, edited by TellesEdwardSawyerMarkRivera-SalgadoGaspar, 63–95. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
43.
Jones-CorreaMichaelWallaceSophiaZepeda-MillánChris. 2016. “The Impact of Large-Scale Collective Action on Latino Perceptions of Commonality and Competition with African Americans.” Social Science Quarterly97 (2): 458–75.
44.
JunnJaneMasuokaNatalie. 2008. “Asian American Identity: Shared Racial Status and Political Context.” Perspectives on Politics6 (4): 729–40.
45.
KaneEmily W.2000. “Racial and Ethnic Variations in Gender-Related Attitudes.” Annual Review of Sociology26:419–39.
46.
KaufmannKaren M.2003. “Black and Latino Voters in Denver: Responses to Each Other’s Political Leadership.” Political Science Quarterly118 (1): 107–25.
47.
LienPei-TeConwayMargaret M.WongJanell. 2008. The Politics of Asian Americans. New York: Routledge.
48.
LopezMark HugoLivingstonGretchen. 2009. “Hispanics and the Criminal Justice System: Low Confidence, High Exposure.” Pew Research Center, Washington, DC.
49.
LopezMark HugoTaylorPaul. 2012. “Latino Voters in the 2012 Election.” Pew Research Center, Washington, DC.
50.
LublinDavid Ian. 1997. The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests in Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
51.
MasuokaNatalie. 2006. “Together They Become One: Examining the Predictors of Panethnic Group Consciousness among Asian Americans and Latinos.” Social Science Quarterly87 (5): 993–1011.
52.
MasuokaNatalie. 2017. Multiracial Identity and Racial Politics in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.
53.
MasuokaNatalieJunnJane. 2013. The Politics of Belonging: Race, Public Opinion and Immigration. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
54.
McCallLeslie. 2005. “The Complexity of Intersectionality.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society30 (3): 1771–1800.
55.
McClainPaula D.CarewJessica JohnsonWaltonEugeneJr.WattsCandis S. 2009. “Group Membership, Group Identity, and Group Consciousness: Measures of Racial Identity in American Politics?” Annual Review of Political Science12:471–85.
56.
McClainPaula D.CarterNiambi M.DeFrancesco SotoVictoria M.LyleMonique L.GrynaviskiJeffrey D.NunnallyShayla C.ScottoThomas J.KendrickJ. AlanLackeyGerald F., and Kendra Davenport Cotton. 2006. “Racial Distancing in a Southern City: Latino Immigrants’ Views of Black Americans.” The Journal of Politics68 (3): 571–84.
57.
McConnaughyCorrineWhiteIsmail K.LealDavid L.CasellasJason P. 2010. “A Latino on the Ballot: Explaining Coethnic Voting among Latinos and the Response of White Americans.” The Journal of Politics72 (4): 1199–1211.
58.
McDermottMonika L.1998. “Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections.” Political Research Quarterly51 (4): 895–918.
59.
MilkmanRuthTerriquezVeronica. 2012. “‘We Are the Ones Who Are Out in Front’: Women’s Leadership in the Immigrant Rights Movement.” Feminist Studies38 (3): 723–52.
60.
MillerArthur H.GurinPatriciaGurinGeraldMalanchukOksana. 1981. “Group Consciousness and Political Participation.” American Journal of Political Science25:494–511.
61.
MontoyaCeleste. 2019. “From Identity Politics to Intersectionality? Identity-Based Organizing in the Occupy Movement.” In Gendered Mobilization and Intersectional Challenges, edited by IrvineJillLangSabineMontoyaCeleste, 135–54. London: ECPR Press.
62.
MorinJason L.SanchezGabriel R.BarretoMatt. 2011. “Perceptions of Competition.” In Just Neighbors? Research on African American and Latino Relations in the United States, edited by TellesEdwardSawyerMarkRivera-SalgadoGaspar, 63–95. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
63.
NoblesMelissa. 2000. Shades of Citizenship: Race and the Census in Modern Politics. Stanford: Stanford California University Press.
64.
PhilpotTasha S.WaltonHanesJr.2007. “One of Our Own: Black Female Candidates and the Voters Who Support Them.” American Journal of Political Science51:49–62. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4122905.
65.
PopkinSamuel. 1991. The Reasoning Voter. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
66.
Purdie-VaughnsValerieEibachRichard P. 2008. “Intersectional Invisibility: The Distinctive Advantages and Disadvantages of Multiple Subordinate-Group Identities.” Sex Roles59:377–91.
67.
SanchezGabriel R.2008. “Latino Group Consciousness and Perception of Commonality with African Americans.” Social Science Quarterly89 (2): 428–44.
68.
SanchezGabriel R.MasuokaNatalie. 2010. “Brown-Utility Heuristic? The Presence and Contributing Factors of Latino Linked Fate.” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences32 (4): 519–31.
69.
SanchezGabriel R.VargasEdward D. 2016. “Taking a Closer Look at Group Identity.” Political Research Quarterly69 (1): 160–74.
70.
SchildkrautDeborah J.2017. “White Attitudes about Descriptive Representation in the US: The Roles of Identity, Discrimination, and Linked Fate.” Politics, Groups, and Identities5 (1): 84–106.
71.
SeguraGaryRodriguesHelena Alves. 2006. “Comparative Ethnic Politics in the United States: Beyond Black and White.” Annual Review of Political Science9:375–95.
72.
SimienEvelyn M.2005. “Race, Gender, and Linked Fate.” Journal of Black Studies35 (5): 529–50.
73.
SimienEvelyn M.ClawsonRosalee A. 2004. “The Intersection of Race and Gender: An Examination of Black Feminist Consciousness, Race Consciousness, and Policy Attitudes.” Social Science Quarterly85 (3): 793–810.
74.
StetsJan E.BurkePeter J. 2000. “Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly63:224–37.
75.
StrolovitchDara. 2007. Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
76.
SudburyJulia C.2003. “Toward a Holistic Anti-violence Agenda: Women of Color as Radical Bridge-Builders.” Social Justice3 (93): 134–40.
77.
TajfelHenriTurnerJohn C. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by AustinWilliam G.WorchelStephen, 33–47. Monterey: Brooks-Cole.
78.
TateKatherine. 1994. From Protest to Politics: The New Black Voters in American Elections. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
79.
TateKatherine. 2001. “The Political Representation of Blacks in Congress: Does Race Matter.” Legislative Studies Quarterly26 (4): 623–38.
80.
TateKatherine. 2003. Black Faces in the Mirror. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
81.
VargasEdwardSanchezGabriel R.ValdezJuan A. 2017. “Immigration Policies and Group Identity: How Immigrant Laws Affect Linked Fate among U.S. Latino Populations.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics2 (1): 35–62.
82.
WallaceSophia. 2014a. “Examining Descriptive and Substantive Representation in Congress.” Political Research Quarterly67 (4): 917–29.
83.
WallaceSophia. 2014b. “Examining Latino Support for Descriptive Representation: The Role of Identity and Discrimination.” Social Science Quarterly95 (2): 311–27.
84.
WhitbyKenneth. 1997. The Color of Representation: Congressional Behavior and Black Interests. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
85.
WilkinsonBetina. 2014. Partners or Rivals? Power and Latino, Black, and White Relations in the Twenty-First Century. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
86.
YeeShirley J.1994. “Gender Ideology and Black Women as Community-Builders in Ontario, 1850-70.” Canadian Historical Review75 (1): 53–73.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
