Scholars of foreign policy decision-making have argued that international interactions ultimately are grounded in people acting singly or in groups. Unfortunately, data limitations prevent many of these crucial foreign policy decision-making theories from being rigorously tested and systematically compared with theories from alternative perspectives. A promising approach to remedying this deficiency is the addition of decision-making variables to existing, large-N data sets. In this study, we coded a series of foreign policy decision-making variables for all U.S. cases in the International Crisis Behavior (ICB) data set, and examined how these decision-making variables compared with structural factors in shaping crisis outcomes. The results reveal that when controlling for structural factors such as conflict setting and power discrepancy, foreign policy decision-making variables related to leaders’ traits, advisory structure, and the political context shaped the severity and centrality of violence employed by the United States. We conclude that including decision-making variables alongside structural variables will enhance the quality of data analysis in the areas of conflict studies and foreign policy analysis.
BeardsleyKyle C.QuinnDavid M.BiswasBidishaWilkenfeldJonathan. 2006. “Mediation Style and Crisis Outcomes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution50:58–86.
2.
BlagdenDavid. 2016. “Induction and Deduction in International Relations: Squaring the Circle between Theory and Evidence.” International Studies Review18:195–213.
3.
BoettcherWilliam A.III. 2005. Presidential Risk Behavior in Foreign Policy: Prudence or Peril?New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
BrecherMichael. 1999. “ISA Presidential Address.” International Studies Quarterly43:213–64.
5.
BrecherMichaelJamesPatrickWilkenfeldJonathan. 2000. “Crisis Escalation to War: Findings from the International Crisis Behavior Project.” In What Do We Know About War? edited by Vasquez, 37–56John A.New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
6.
BrecherMichaelWilkenfeldJonathan. (1997) 2000. A Study of Crisis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7.
BreuningMarijke. 2007. Foreign Policy Analysis: A Comparative Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
8.
CaprioliMaryBoyerMark A.2001. “Gender, Violence, and International Crisis.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution45:503–18.
9.
ChiozzaGiacomoGoemansH. E.2003. “Peace through Insecurity: Tenure and International Conflict.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution47:443–67.
10.
CoaseRonald H.1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics3:1–44.
11.
CuhadarEsraKaarboJulietKesginBarisOzkececi-TanerBinnur. 2017. “Personality or Role? Comparisons of Turkish Leaders across Different Institutional Positions.” Political Psychology38:39–54.
12.
DriverMichael J.1977. “Individual Differences as Determinants of Aggression in the Inter-Nation Simulation.” In A Psychological Examination of Political Leaders, edited by HermannM., 337–53. New York: The Free Press.
13.
DysonStephen Benedict. 2006. “Personality and Foreign Policy: Tony Blair’s Iraq Decisions.” Foreign Policy Analysis2:289–306.
14.
DysonStephen BenedictPrestonThomas. 2006. “Individual Characteristics of Political Leaders and the Use of Analogy in Foreign Policy Decision Making.” Political Psychology27:265–88.
15.
FosterDennisKellerJonathan. 2014. “Leaders’ Cognitive Complexity, Distrust, and the Diversionary Use of Force.” Foreign Policy Analysis10:205–33.
16.
GarrisonJean A.2005. Making China Policy: From Nixon to G. W. Bush. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
17.
GarrisonJean A.2007. “Constructing the ‘National Interest’ in U.S.-China Policy Making: How Foreign Policy Decision Groups Define and Signal Policy Choices.” Foreign Policy Analysis3:105–26.
18.
GarrisonJean A.2010. “Small Group Effects on Foreign Policy Decision Making.” In The International Studies Encyclopedia, edited by DenemarkRobert A., 6458–76, vol. VII. Malden: Wiley Blackwell.
19.
GeorgeAlexander L.1980. Presidential Decisionmaking in Foreign Policy: The Effective Use of Information and Advice. Boulder: Westview Press.
20.
HermannCharles F.SteinJanice GrossSundeliusBengtWalkerStephen G.2001. “Resolve, Accept, or Avoid: Effects of Group Conflict on Foreign Policy Decisions.” International Studies Review3:133–68.
21.
HermannMargaret G.1987. “Handbook for Assessing Personal Characteristics and Foreign Policy Orientations of Political Leaders.” Mershon Occasional Papers, Mershon Center, Columbus.
HermannMargaret G.HermannCharles F.1989. “Who Makes Foreign Policy Decisions and How: An Empirical Inquiry.” International Studies Quarterly33:361–87.
24.
HermannMargaret G.PrestonThomas. 1994. “Presidents, Advisers, and Foreign Policy: The Effect of Leadership Style on Executive Arrangements.” Political Psychology15:75–96.
25.
HowellWilliam G.PevehouseJon C.2005. “Presidents, Congress, and the Use of Force.” International Organization59:209–32.
26.
HowellWilliam G.PevehouseJon C.2007. “When Congress Stops Wars.” Foreign Affairs86:95–107.
27.
HudsonValerie M.2005. “Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations.” Foreign Policy Analysis1:1–30.
HudsonValerie M.VoreChristopher S.1995. “Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow.” Mershon International Studies Review39:209–38.
30.
JamesPatrick. 1988. Crisis and War. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
31.
JohnsonRichard Tanner. 1974. Managing the White House: An Intimate Study of the Presidency. New York: Harper & Row.
32.
KellerJonathan W.2005a. “Constraint Respecters, Constraint Challengers, and Crisis Decision Making in Democracies: A Case Study Analysis of Kennedy versus Reagan.” Political Psychology26:835–67.
33.
KellerJonathan W.2005b. “Leadership Style, Regime Type, and Foreign Policy Crisis Behavior: A Contingent Monadic Peace?”International Studies Quarterly49:405–32.
34.
KellerJonathan W.FosterDennis M.2012. “Presidential Leadership Style and the Political Use of Force.” Political Psychology33:581–98.
35.
KellerJonathan W.YangYi Edward. 2008. “Leadership Style, Decision Context, and the Poliheuristic Theory of Decision-Making: An Experimental Analysis.” Journal of Conflict Resolution52:687–712.
36.
LevyJack S.1994. “Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield.” International Organization48:279–312.
37.
LianBradleyOnealJohn R.1993. “Presidents, the Use of Military Force, and Public Opinion.” Journal of Conflict Resolution37:277–300.
38.
McDermottRose. 2007. Presidential Leadership, Illness and Decision Making. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
MintzAlexDeRouenKarlJr.2010. Understanding Foreign Policy Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
MintzAlexWayneCarly. 2016. The Polythink Syndrome: U.S. Foreign Policy Decisions on 9/11, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria, and ISIS. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
41.
MitchellDavid. 2005a. “Centralizing Advisory Systems: Presidential Influence and the U.S. Foreign Policy Decision-Making Process.” Foreign Policy Analysis1:181–206.
42.
MitchellDavid. 2005b. Making Foreign Policy: Presidential Management of the Decision-Making Process. London: Routledge.
43.
NeackLauraHeyJeanne A. K.HaneyPatrick J., eds. 1995. Foreign Policy Analysis: Continuity and Change in Its Second Generation. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
44.
ӦzdamarӦzgür. 2017. “Leadership Analysis at a ‘Great Distance’: Using the Operational Code Construct to Analyse Islamist Leaders.” Global Society31:167–98.
45.
ÖzdamarÖzgurCanbolatSercan. 2018. “Understanding New Middle Eastern Leadership: An Operational Code Approach.” Political Research Quarterly71:19–31.
46.
PrestonThomas. 1997. “‘Following the Leader’: The Impact of U.S. Presidential Style upon Advisory Group Dynamics, Structure, and Decision.” In Beyond Groupthink: Political Group Dynamics and Foreign Policy-Making, edited by PrestonThomasSternEricSundeliusBengt‘t HartPaulSundeliusBengt, 191–248. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
47.
PrestonThomas. 2001. The President and His Inner Circle: Leadership Style and the Advisory Process in Foreign Policy Making. New York: Columbia University Press.
48.
PrinsBrandon C.2010. “Interventions/Uses of Force Short of War.” In The International Studies Encyclopedia, edited by DenemarkRobert A., 4646–69, vol. VII. Malden: Wiley Blackwell.
49.
RussettBruce. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
50.
SalmonElizabethGelfandMicheleCelikBetulKrausSaritWilkenfeldJonathanInmanMolly. 2013. “Cultural Contingencies of Mediation: Effectiveness of Mediation Style in Intercultural Disputes.” Journal of Organizational Behavior4:887–909.
51.
SatterfieldJason M.1998. “Cognitive-Affective States Predict Political and Military Aggression and Risk-Taking: A Content Analysis of Churchill, Hitler, Roosevelt, and Stalin.” Journal of Conflict Resolution42:667–90.
52.
SchaferMarkCrichlowScott. 2010. Groupthink vs. High-Quality Decision Making in International Relations. New York: Columbia University Press.
53.
SchaferMarkWalkerStephen, eds. 2006. Beliefs and Leadership in World Politics: Methods and Applications of Operational Code Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
54.
SofrinAmnon. 2017. “The Two-Group Decision Model: Applications to Military Intervention in the Middle East.” Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, Baltimore, February 22.
55.
‘t HartPaul. 1990. Groupthink in Government: A Study of Small Groups and Policy Failure. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
56.
VertzbergerYaacov. 1998. Risk Taking and Decisionmaking: Foreign Military Intervention Decisions. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
57.
WalkerStephen G.SchaferMarkYoungMichael D.1998. “Systematic Procedures for Operational Code Analysis: Measuring and Modeling Jimmy Carter’s Operational Code.” International Studies Quarterly42:175–89.
58.
WallaceMichael D.SuedfeldPeterThachukKimberley. 1993. “Political Rhetoric of Leaders under Stress in the Gulf Crisis.” Journal of Conflict Resolution37:94–107.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
