Congress is more polarized than ever. At the same time, there are fewer military veterans serving in Congress than ever before. Candidates with military experience, along with their supporters, argue that electing more veterans could help reduce dysfunction and gridlock. They claim that military values, such as duty and teamwork, translate into differences in legislative behavior. But are veteran lawmakers more effective than those without military experience? Are they more bipartisan? Using House data from the 104th to 116th Congresses (1995–2021), I examine the extent to which military experience influences a lawmaker’s ability to legislate and engage in bipartisan behavior. I find that veteran lawmakers are more effective at advancing consequential legislation. Additionally, veterans appear more willing to collaborate with members of the opposite party, especially in recent Congresses. These effects are particularly evident among those who served on active duty. I conclude by considering the implications of these findings for maintaining healthy civil-military relations in America.
AdlerE. ScottWilkersonJohn D.. 2013. Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AnziaSarah F.BerryChristopher R.. 2011. “The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson Effect: Why Do Congresswomen Outperform Congressmen?” American Journal of Political Science55 (3): 478–493.
3.
BachmanJeraldLeeSigelmanDiamondGreg. 1987. “Self-Selection, Socialization, and Distinctive Military Values: Attitudes of High School Seniors.” Armed Forces & Society13 (2): 169–187.
BestRebeccaVonnahmeGreg. 2021. “Military Service and Legislative Agendas: A Study of Legislators in Four States.” Armed Forces and Society47 (2): 367–385.
9.
BiancoWilliam T.1994. Trust: Representatives and Constituents. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
10.
BiancoWilliam T.2005. “Last Post for “The Greatest Generation:” The Policy Implications of the Decline of Military Experience in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly30 (1): 85–102.
11.
BrattonKathleen A.2006. “The Behavior and Success of Latino State Legislators: Evidence from the States.” Social Science Quarterly87: 1136–1157.
BrownAnthony G.2018. “Congressman Anthony G. Brown on Morning Joe; November 19, 2018.” Morning Joe, Interviewed by Joe Scarborough and Kacie Hunt. MSNBC; November 19, 2018. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fThd_lNihIs
14.
BurbachDavid T.2018. “Partisan Dimensions of Confidence in the U.S. Military, 1973-2016.” Armed Forces and Society45 (2): 211–233.
15.
BurdenBarry C.2007. Personal Roots of Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
CarnesNicholas. Does the Numerical Underrepresentation of the Working Class in Congress Matter?Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2012; 37(1): 5–34.
17.
ChatagnierJ. TysonKlinglerJonathan D.. 2022. “Would You Like to Know More? Selection, Socialization, and the Political Attitudes of Military Veterans.” Political Research Quarterly76 (3): 1209–1223.
18.
CormackLindsey. 2018. Congress and U.S. Veterans: From the GI Bill to the VA Crisis. New York, NY: Praeger.
19.
CraigAlison W.2021. “It Takes a Coalition: The Community Impacts of Collaboration.” Legislative Studies Quarterly46 (1): 11–48.
20.
CurryJames M.2015. Legislating in the Dark: Information and Power in the House of Representatives. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
CurryJames M.LeeFrances E.. 2020. The Limits of Party: Congress and Lawmaking in a Polarized Era. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
DempseyJason. 2010. Our Army: Soldiers, Politics, and American Civil-Military Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
GelpiChristopherFeaverPeter. 2002. “Speak Softly and Carry a Big Stick? Veterans in the Political Elite and the American Use of Force.” American Political Science Review96 (4): 779–793.
GoodwinGerald F.BlacksmithNikkiCoatsMeredith R.. 2018. “The Science of Teams in the Military: Contributions from Over 60 Years of Research.” American Psychologist73 (4): 322–333.
33.
GuentherScott M.SearleDavid M.. 2019. “Limited Time, Limited Resources: Trade-Offs in Congressional Earmarking and Policymaking.” American Politics Research47 (4): 832–851.
34.
HallRichard L.1996. Participation in Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35.
HarbridgeLaurel. 2015. Is Bipartisanship Dead? Policy Agreement and Agenda-Setting in the House of Representatives. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Harbridge-YongLaurelCraigVoldenWisemanAlan E.. 2023. “The Bipartisan Path to Effective Lawmaking.” Journal of Politics85 (3): 1048–1063.
37.
HardyMolly M.CokerCalvin R.FunkMichelle E.WarnerBenjamin R.. 2019. “Which Ingroup, When? Effects of Gender, Partisanship, Veteran Status, and Evaluator Identities on Candidate Evaluations.” Communications Quarterly67 (2): 199–220.
38.
HeberligEric S.LarsonBruce A.. 2012. Congressional Parties, Institutional Ambition, and the Financing of Majority Control. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press.
39.
HelmusTodd C., et al. Life as a Private: A Study of the Motivations and Experiences of Junior Enlisted Personnel in the U.S. Army. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2018. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2252.html
40.
HorowitzMichael C.StamAllan. 2014. “How Prior Military Experience Influences the Future Militarized Behavior of Leaders.” International Organization68 (3): 527–599.
41.
HorowitzMichael C.StamAllanEllisCali. 2015. Why Leaders Fight. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
42.
HorowitzMichael C.PotterPhilipSechserTodd S.StamAllen. 2018. “Sizing Up the Adversary: Leader Attributes and Coercion in International Conflict.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution62 (10): 2180–2204.
HuntingtonSamuel P.1957. The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil- Military Relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
JanowitzMorris. 1960. The Professional Soldier: A Social and Political Portrait. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
46.
JanowitzMorris. 1983. “Civic Consciousness and Military Performance.” In The Political Education of Soldiers, edited by JanowitzMorrisWesbrookStephen D.. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
47.
JenningsM. KentMarkusGregory B.. 1977. “The Effect of Military Service on Political Attitudes: A Panel Study.” American Political Science Review71 (1): 131–147.
48.
KirklandJustin H.The Relational Determinants of Legislative Outcomes: Strong and Weak Ties Between Legislators. Journal of Politics. 2011; 73(3): 887–898.
49.
KogerGregory. 2003. “Position Taking and Cosponsorship in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly28 (2): 225–46.
50.
KrehbielKeith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
51.
LawlessJennifer L.2015. “Female Candidates and Legislators.” Annual Review of Political Science18: 349–366.
52.
LawlessJennifer L.TheriaultSean M.GuthrieSamantha. 2018. “Nice Girls? Sex, Collegiality, and Bipartisan Cooperation in the US Congress.” Journal of Politics80 (4): 1268–1282.
53.
LealDavid L.TeigenJeremy M.. 2018. “Military Service and Political Participation in the United States: Institutional Experience and the Vote.” Election Studies53: 99–110.
54.
LeeFrances E.2009. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55.
LeeFrances E.2016. Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
LowandeKennethRitchieMelindaLauterbachErin. 2019. “Descriptive and Substantive Representation in Congress: Evidence from 80,000 Congressional Inquiries.” American Journal of Political Science63 (3): 644–659.
LuptonDanielle L.2017. “Out of Service, into the House: Military Experience and Congressional War Oversight.” Political Research Quarterly70 (2): 327–339.
59.
LuptonDanielle L.2022. “Military Experience and Elite Decision-Making: Self- Selection, Socialization, and the Vietnam Draft Lottery.” International Studies Quarterly66 (1): sqab052.
60.
MansbridgeJane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review97 (4): 515–528.
61.
MatthewsMichael D.EidJarleKellyDennisJenniferK. S. BaileyPetersonChristopher. 2006. “Character Strengths and Virtues of Developing Military Leaders: An International Comparison.” Military Psychology18 (Suppl): 57–68.
62.
MattoxJohn Mark. 2013. “Values Statements and the Profession of Arms: A Reevaluation.” Joint Forces Quarterly1 (68): 59–63.
63.
MayhewDavid R.1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
64.
McCartyNolanPooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
65.
McChrystalStanleyCollinsTantumSilvermanDavidFussellChris. 2015. Team of Teams: New Rules of Engagement for a Complex World. New York, NY: Portfolio/Penguin.
66.
McDermottMonika L.PanagopoulosCostas. 2015. “Be All that You Can Be: The Electoral Impact of Military Service as an Information Cue.” Political Research Quarterly68 (2): 293–305.
MettlerSuzanne. 2005. Soldiers to Citizens: The G.I. Bill and the Making of the Greatest Generation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
69.
MillerMark C.1995. The High Priests of American Politics: The Role of Lawyers in American Political Institutions. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.
70.
MintzAlexReddSteven B.VedlitzArnold. 2006. “Can We Generalize from Student Experiments to the Real World in Political Science, Military Affairs, and International Relations?” Journal of Conflict Resolution50 (5): 757–776.
OliverLaurel W.HarmanJoanHooverElizabethHayesStephanie M.PandhiNancy A.. 1999. “A Quantitative Integration of the Military Cohesion Literature.” Military Psychology11 (1): 57–83.
SquirePeverill. Legislative Professionalization and Membership Diversity in State Legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 1992; 17(1): 69–79.
82.
SwersMichele L.2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
83.
TeigenJeremy M.2018. Why Veterans Run: Military Service in American Presidential Elections 1789-2016. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
84.
TheriaultSean M.2006. “Party Polarization in the U.S. Congress: Member Replacement and Member Adaptation.” Party Politics12 (4): 483–503.
85.
U.S. Department of the Army. 2015. “Army Team Building: Army Techniques Publication 6- 22.6.”
86.
VoldenCraig C.WisemanAlan E.. 2014. Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Congress: The Lawmakers. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
87.
VoldenCraig C.WisemanAlan E.WittmerDana. 2013. “Are Women More Effective Lawmakers Than Men?” American Journal of Political Science57 (2): 326–341.
88.
WallaceSophia J.2014. “Representing Latinos: Examining Descriptive and Substantive Representation in Congress.” Political Research Quarterly67 (4): 917–929.
WoodruffToddKeltyRyanSegalDavid R. Propensity to Serve and Motivation to Enlist Among American Combat Soldiers. Armed Forces & Society. 2006; 32(3): 353–366.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
