Two studies explored the mating strategies and mate preferences of mail order brides (MOBs) from three different countries. In the first study, 48 Colombian MOBs were compared with 44 single Colombian women who were not MOBs on a variety of attitudinal and demographic characteristics. Both groups also identified qualities that they wished to communicate about themselves to a prospective mate, qualities that they most desired in a mate, and qualities that they believed were most highly sought after by a prospective mate. In the second study, the expressed mate preferences of 60 MOBs from Colombia, Russia, and the Philippines were compared. With only minor cross-cultural variability, both studies confirmed the importance of characteristics such as commitment, ambition, and sexual fidelity that have been identified in previous studies of female mate choice. The results are discussed within a framework of evolutionary explanations for mate preferences in human females.
Baize, H. R., & Schroeder, J. E. (1995). Personality and mate selection in personal ads: Evolutionary preferences in a public mate selection process. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 517-536.
2.
Barrett, L., Dunbar, R., & Lycett, J. (2002). Human evolutionary psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
Bereczkei, T., & Csanaky, A. (1996). Mate choice, marital success, and reproduction in modern society. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 17-35.
4.
Betzig, L. (1989). Causes of conjugal dissolution. Current Anthropology, 30, 654-676.
5.
Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1988). Kipsigis bridewealth payments. In L. L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder, & P. Turke (Eds.), Human reproductive behavior(pp. 65-82). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses testing in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
7.
Buss, D. M. (1994). The strategies of human mating. American Scientist, 82, 238-249.
8.
Buss, D. M. (1996). The evolutionary psychology of human social strategies. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles(pp. 3-38). New York: Guilford.
9.
Buss, D. M. (2004). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
10.
Buss, D. M., Abbott, M., Angleitner, A., Asherian, A., Biaggio, A., Blanco-Villasenor, A., et al. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 5-47.
11.
Buss, D. M.,& Barnes, M. F. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559-570.
12.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
13.
Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A.,& Larsen, R. J. (2001). A half century of American mate preferences. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 491-503.
14.
Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Kenrick, D. T.,& Warntjes, A. (2001). Age preferences for mates as related to gender, own age, and involvement level. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 241-250.
15.
Campbell, D. T.,& Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminative validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
16.
Campos, L. D. S., Otta, E., & Siqueira, J. D. O. (2002). Sex differences in mate selection strategies: Content analyses and responses to personal advertisements in Brazil. Evolution andHumanBehavior, 23, 395-406.
17.
Feingold, A. (1990). Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 981-993.
18.
Feingold, A. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 125-139.
19.
Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1997). The evolutionary psychology of extra-pair sex: The role of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 69-88.
20.
Goode, E. (1996). Gender and courtship entitlement: Responses to personal ads. Sex Roles, 34, 141-169.
21.
Grammer, K. (1989). Human courtship behaviour: Biological basis and cognitive processing. In A. E. Rasa, C. Vogel, & E. Voland (Eds.), The sociobiology of sexual and reproductive strategies(pp. 147-169). London: Chapman & Hall.
22.
Greenlees, I. A.,& McGrew, W. C. (1994). Sex and age differences in preferences an tactics of mate attraction: Analysis of published advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 59-72.
23.
Johnston, V. S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B., & Grammer, K. (2001). Male facial attractiveness: Evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 251-267.
24.
Kasser, T., & Sharma, Y. S. (1999). Reproductive freedom, educational equality, and females' preference for resource-acquisition characteristics in mates. Psychological Science, 10, 374-377.
25.
Kenrick, D. T., Groth, G. E., Trost, M. R.,& Sadalla, E. K. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement on mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 951-969.
26.
Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75-133.
27.
Kenrick, D. T., Keefe, R. C., Gabrielidis, C.,& Cornelius, J. S. (1996). Adolescents' age preferences for dating partners: Support for an evolutionary model of life history patterns. Child Development, 67, 1499-1511.
28.
Kojima, Y. (2001). In the business of cultural reproduction: Theoretical implications of the mail-order bride phenomenon. Women's Studies International Forum, 24, 199-209.
29.
Low, B. S. (2000). Why sex matters: A Darwinian look at human behaviour. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
Lynn, M., & Shurgot, B. A. (1984). Responses to lonely hearts advertisements: Effects of reported physical attractiveness, physique, and coloration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 349-357.
31.
Pawlowski, B.,& Dunbar, R. I. M. (1999). Impact of market value on human mate choice decisions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 266, 281-285.
32.
Pawlowski, B.,& Koziel, S. (2002). The impact of traits offered in personal advertisements on response rates. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 139-149.
33.
Perusse, D. (1994). Mate choice in modern societies: Testing evolutionary hypotheses with behavioral data. Human Nature, 5, 256-278.
34.
Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role ofwaist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 293-307.
35.
Singh, D., & Young, R. K. (1995). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Role in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 483-507.
36.
Sitton, S.,& Blanchard, S. (1995). Men's preferences in romantic partners: Obesity vs. addiction. Psychological Reports, 77, 1185-1186.
37.
Thiessen, D., Young, R. K.,& Burrough, R. (1993). Lonely hearts advertisements reflect sexually dimorphic mating strategies. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 209-229.
38.
Thornhill, R.,& Gangestad, S. W. (1999). The scent of symmetry: A human sex pheromone that signals fitness?Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 175-201.
39.
Thornhill, R.,& Moeller, A. P. (1997). Developmental stability, disease, and medicine. Biological Review, 72, 497-548.
40.
Townsend, J. M.(1989). Mate selection criteria: Apilot study. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10, 241-253.
41.
Waynforth, D., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (1995). Conditional mate choice strategies in humans: Evidence from “lonely hearts” advertisements. Behaviour, 132, 755-779.
42.
Wiederman, M. W. (1993). Evolved gender differences in mate preferences: Evidence from personal advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 331-352.
43.
Wilson, A. (1998). American catalogue of Asian brides. In J. B. Cole (Ed.), Anthropology for the nineties(pp. 114-125). New York: Free Press.
44.
Wood, W.,& Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699-727.
