The author hypothesizes that games of strategy will be more prevalent in societies where political power is based on a “network strategy.” In such societies, political leaders manipulate social relations and symbols to aggrandize themselves. The author hypothesizes that such activities will promote the importance of obedience, and will foster the emergence and perpetuation of games of strategy. The author tests this hypothesis using data from a random sample of 26 societies, and finds strong support.
Barry, H., Josephson, L., Lauer, E., & Marshall, C. (1976). Traits inculcated in childhood. Ethnology, 15, 83-114.
2.
Blanton, R.E., Feinman, G.A., Kowalewski, S.A., & Peregrine, P.N. (1996). A dual-processual theory for the evolution of Mesoamerican civilization. Current Anthropology , 37, 1-14.
3.
Bramm, A. (2001). Cross-cultural evaluation of the corporate-network strategy: A study of human sociopolitical organization. Bachelor's honors thesis, Lawrence University, Appleton , WI.
4.
Chick, G. (1998). Games in culture revisited: A replication of Roberts, Arth, and Bush (1959). Cross-Cultural Research, 32, 185-206.
5.
Divale, W. (Ed.). (2000). World Cultures Volumes 1 to 11(1) [CD-ROM]. World Cultures, 11(2).
6.
Roberts, J.M., Arth, M.J., & Bush, R.R. (1959). Games in culture. American Anthropologist , 61, 597-605.
7.
Roberts, J.M., & Sutton-Smith, B. (1962). Child training and game involvement. Ethnology, 1, 166-184.
