Advances in transportation safety and efficiency enables road users to eventually care about travel experiences and satisfactions. Prosocial behavior is an important factor affecting wellbeing in mobility. To better understand what leads to prosocial behaviors, and how people experience such actions, we conduct a detailed analysis of behaviors across various levels of prosociality. This paper utilizes a naturalistic dataset for prosocial behaviors, with multimodal signals. We analyze road user behaviors and physiological responses in relation to the effort, obligation, and satisfaction associated with prosocial behaviors. The results suggest significant behavioral patterns across different conditions related to prosocial behaviors.
AdmoniH.ScassellatiB. (2017). Social eye gaze in human-robot interaction: A review. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 6(1), 25–63. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.6.1.Admoni
2.
AhmedM. M.KhanM. N.DasA.DadvarS. E. (2022). Global lessons learned from naturalistic driving studies to advance traffic safety and operation research: A systematic review. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 167, 106568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106568
3.
BoucseinW. (2012). Electrodermal activity. Springer Science & Business Media.
4.
BozókiS.DezsőL.PoeszA.TemesiJ. (2013). Analysis of pairwise comparison matrices: An empirical research. Annals of Operations Research, 211, 511–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-012-1256-4
FageotJ.FarhadkhaniS.HoangL.-N.VillemaudO. (2024). Generalized Bradley-Terry models for score estimation from paired comparisons. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 38, pp. 20379–20386). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v38i23.30188
7.
FoggB. J. (2019). Fogg behavior model. Behavior Design Lab, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, Tech. Rep.
8.
GeY.LiuX.ShenB.QuW. (2021). Can prosocial attitude reduce the risk behavior in simulated driving?Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 79, 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.03.013
HardenA. L.ColeM. E.BautschB.MarkusicC.KinnC.BolteJ. H.IV. (2023). Crash research network: A retrospective approach to Vision Zero. In Conference Proceedings, International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI) (pp. 942–943).
11.
JiménezF.NaranjoJ. E.AnayaJ. J.GarcíaF.PonzA.ArmingolJ. M. (2016). Advanced driver assistance system for road environments to improve safety and efficiency. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 2245–2254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.244
12.
KayeS.-A.RodwellD.Watson-BrownN.RoseC.BuckleyL. (2022). Road users’ engagement in prosocial and altruistic behaviors: A systematic review. Journal of Safety Research, 82, 342–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.07.007
13.
KnobelM.HassenzahlM.MännleinS.LamaraM.SchumannJ.EckoldtK.KlannM.MahlkeS.ButzA. (2013). Become a member of the last gentlemen: Designing for prosocial driving. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (pp. 60–66). https://doi.org/10.1145/2513506.2513517
14.
LeanY.ShanF. (2012). Brief review on physiological and biochemical evaluations of human mental workload. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 22(3), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20273
15.
MehrotraS.LiM.AkashK. (2024). What’s beyond safety? Workshop on promoting well-being for mobility users in future hybrid societies. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 253–255). https://doi.org/10.1145/3589390.3605822
ZhengZ.AkashK.MisuT.KrishnamoorthyV.DongM.LeeY.HuangG. (2022). Identification of adaptive driving style preference through implicit inputs in SAE L2 vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (pp. 468–475). https://doi.org/10.1145/3536221.3556621
